Posted on 11/25/2007 5:58:15 PM PST by Travis McGee
How ‘bout dem Stillers?
A wise man prepares.
>PAY HIGH PRICE FOR UNION MADE CRAP!!!!!<
*****************
SUPPORT THE AMERICAN ECONOMY!
PROVIDE GOOD JOBS TO AMERICANS!
PROMOTE THE ENTREPRENUERIAL AMERICAN SPIRIT!
ENSURE AMERICA’S VIABLE FUTURE!
VOTE FOR THE MAN WITH A HEART FOR HIS COUNTRY, VOTE FOR DUNCAN HUNTER!!!!
Concur. My best estimate is that we've got between four to six months before reaching the point at which the tornado could hit.
Hooray! A clarion call for common sense. This is an important, timely, and fascinating book. Ron Brownstein describes how American politics became so polarized and partisan, explains why this is so damaging to our nation, and suggests ways we can reverse this trend. Every voter should read it right away, for the sake of our democracy.
archy, can you offer a back-of-the-napkin example of Brownstein's suggestions for reversing the current trend?
I'm mainly curious about whether the author has taken full measure of the Herculean task that "fixing things" will truly be (Congress alone is a damned good modern example of the Augean stables).
I could use a little more time, but not too much.
A year would be about right.
Stay safe, stay well.
Yorktown.
How has NAFTA been a disaster for our manufacturing? Last I checked businesses are moving factories overseas, not Mexico or Canada (that weren’t already there).
First, read his bio and columns. I'm not real certain that I'd consider adopting ANY of Brownstein's suggestions for reversing the current trend, or even that reversing the trend is desirable. But you can read some of his LA Times columns here, after considering a few tidbits from his bio:
Ronald Brownstein is the national affairs columnist for the Los Angeles Times, writing a weekly column every Wendesday on politics and policy as well as regular pieces for the newspaper's Opinion pages. Previously he served as the Times' national political correspondent and the author of the weekly Washington Outlook column. He has been with the Los Angeles Times since January 1990, except for seven months in 1998 when he served as chief political correspondent and columnist for U.S. News and World Report.
Mr. Brownstein has twice been named a finalist for the Pulitzer Prize, receiving that recognition for his coverage of both the 1996 and 2004 presidential campaigns. The Pulitzer Board, naming him a finalist in 2005, cited "the clarity, consistency and quality of his political reporting during a presidential election year." Mr. Brownstein has appeared as a political analyst for CNN since 1998. In addition he has appeared frequently on "Meet the Press," and "This Week with George Stephanopolous" and previously appeared regularly on "Face the Nation," "The Newshour with Jim Lehrer," and "Washington Week in Review." He has also been a repeat guest on Charlie Rose (where he has served as a substitute host), Nightline, the three network morning programs, MSNBC, CNBC, as well as C-Span. ... .
In 1997, he was named by National Journal as one of the "25 most influential journalists in Washington." In February 2001, Washingtonian Magazine named him as one of Washington's 20 "best and most influential" journalists, writing "Brownstein writes groundbreaking stories frequently. Taken together, they constitute a running chronicle of the political history of our era. His instincts are uncanny." When Brill's Content magazine asked President Clinton in 2000 to name the "one journalist who generally gets it right, explains to you what the issues are, and what's going on in the country," he cited Brownstein.
I'm mainly curious about whether the author has taken full measure of the Herculean task that "fixing things" will truly be (Congress alone is a damned good modern example of the Augean stables).
I think he's sufficiently grounded in history and experience to see what's coming. And if his political outlook is far different from that of Pat Buchanan, it's interesting that those who hold such divergent views note the same or similar eventual outcome.
A year would be about right.
I hope you have it. But be prepared for about half that, and for things to get VERY intense VERY quickly once begun.
I agree. Partisanship in and of itself is not a problem. The fact that Democrat partisanship is so wrong, and bad for America...That is the problem. The great trick is to label partisanship as bad,and then linking Conservativism with being automatically partisan, and therefore bad. They never do that with liberalism and the Democrat party.
“1979 and the Carter Administration was a bleak year and Reagan, the Sunshine Consrvative, said America’s best days were yet to come.<
And they did, for eight, count them, eight years. Then the Globalists got back onto office.”
BUMP
“The greatest invasion in history, from the Third World, is swamping the ethno-cultural core of the country, leading to Balkanization and the loss of the Southwest to Mexico.
The culture is collapsing and the nation is being deconstructed along the lines of race and class.”
Anyone who dobts this hasn’t been to California.
Yes. I'd say that when someone is slandered with a Nazi label by very powerful Republicans and in the mainstream media... that qualifies as "Out to get him."
The “general public doesn’t know the truth or care.” Translation: But I know the truth. and the rest of you don’t.
I know that such accusations are a lie. What else do you want to know?
Geez I could take out his name, substitute Ron Paul or Dennis K. , or a 9/11 tin foil hat theory and that would work.
Buchanan has nothing in common with any of that. He deals in facts. Facts that apparently you don't want to hear.
Hey alot of what he says is true, there’s no denying that. But his persona made him unelectable in the past, would do so today, and will be that way tomorrow.
I like his personality and I would vote for him. But, I just like honesty and guts.
May like what he or anyone else has to say on issues but that does not mean I would vote for him/them.
Suit yourself. I do vote for people who are right on the issues. But, you see the choices we are left with who call themselves Republicans.
And like anyone else who writes a book he is looking for as much face time as he can get to generate sales.
Yes. He should keep his new book a secret for the sake of modesty.
There's no doubt that Hitler was a socialist. After all, it was the "National Socialist German Workers' Party".
“I like his personality and I would vote for him. But, I just like honesty and guts.”
Well, that’s one then. Add a few more and he would do as well as every other fringe candidate.
Pat finally realizes that the Hoover era is over.
“Buchanan has far more creditability than other pundits.”
Absolutely.
Unfortunately, it’s not just liberals who resort to slander because they can’t argue the issues.
Lefties spackle over such inconveniences.
They want to hide the socialism and stress the nationalism to smear their enemies with.
I’m a proud nationalist!
I imagine walking the dogs on a fine peaceful morning that suddenly goes completely wrong. As wrong as your inlaws moving in with you, permanently.
Then, after a brief rush of fear, things settle down to a waiting quiet.
Since I live in the woods, it won’t come to me right away.
I’ll get another week, maybe.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.