http://www.google.com/search?q=abedin+kalamazooFree Republic is the very first hit that you get:
Posted on 11/26/2007 8:49:28 PM PST by ex-Texan
Double ouch and a har dee har har!
I guess we are on an “”’underground’ blog and website.””
The First Post - Online Edition
Look on the right side for more bad news from Afghanistan "Taliban Blues."
And Page 6 was “notorious” when it went after Bill Clinton’s White House Sexual Abuse of Powers, but Clinton was not “notorious”. Right.
I think you are right. They get angry, deny, then attack the messenger as a "right wing tool", then finally when the DNA appears on the dress, admit to what everybody already knew. Just admit it, Hillary! It will come out sooner or later, take your lumps now. BTW I think the republican candidates should get everything out there now, too. No more October surprises.
That photo makes Huma look like a black woman.
I can’t help thinking that this is a non-affair brought forward by the Clintons for political purposes. She knows she’s watched and that others are looking for newz.
We’re jumping to conclusions. Hillary’s platform should be the focus....forget this stuff. It makes her a victim.
Lesbian or not, Huma’s been Hillary’s batman for almost 12 years she undoubtedly know enough to put Hillary in the stocks. I said it before, if a tenth of these stories are true it would be a tossup who works for who but it may be safe to assume the Saudi princes own them both by now.
Murdoch is certainly no conservative; he pushes globalist causes in all of his papers and stations. He loves the Klintons.
-the lid is off the box on this one..........and I am more worried about huma’s ties to Saudi Arabia.......seems they are more to worry about than Bush’s ties. This is blackmail stuff.
Exactly. That's why it is so fitting that the Clinton Library is shaped (and looks like) a TRAILER!!!
The rumor claims the LA Times article “outs” Hillary Clinton as a lesbian, which will have a negative impact her candidacy. She will be replaced by an Al Gore-Michael Bloomberg ticket. A bipartisan ticket: Gore, a democrat and Bloomberg, a Republican, is seen as a brilliant calculation and unstoppable in 2008.
But if the rumor is true, what would make the Los Angeles Times sitting on the story? One theory is basic journalistic ethics is figuring heavily on the timing of such an explosive disclosure. The paper does not want to be accused of influencing the outcome of an election with this revelation.
The seeds of the rumor seem to have originated from the Village Voice’s own Michael Musto who wrote:
As I recently said on Monica Crowley’s radio show, whisper campaigns are claiming that Hillary Clinton is Gayle King-ing her aide de camp, the glamorous Huma Abedin, an Indian/Pakistani goddess from Kalamazoo, Michigan. In other words, Hillary may be putting Huma out there in the press and purposely making her more visible as a pre-emptive strike that amounts to her hiding in plain sight. This way, no Republican can later say, “Who is this gorgeous babe who spends so much intimate time with Hillary that the Observer called her Hill’s ‘body person’? Was Gennifer Flowers’ book right about Hillary’s sexual taste?
This was posted on a left wing blog:
http://fromtheleft.wordpress.com/2007/11/06/rumor-hillary-out-gore-bloomberg-in/
Looks like hillery may be on a slide from which she will not recover in time for New Hampshire.
Ouch? Well, she better put some ice on it.
Alas, the Hillary mystique.
http://www.google.com/search?q=abedin+kalamazooFree Republic is the very first hit that you get:
Whaddaya trying to do, break everybody’s monitor?
beeyouempee
Gotta love it that Drudge is putting this story up......just like he broke the ice and went with the Monica story.
No question that he is no conservative.
Between his 'fund raisers' for Hillary's Senate campaign,,,,and FOX's pushing of Giuliani (i.e. Hannity's shilling for Rudy, and Steve Forbes pushing Rudy most Saturday mornings on "Forbes on Fox",,,,and Roger Ailes likely helping Rudy--no hard proof on this one, yet),,,and Fred Thompson's attack on Fox's slanting the coverage against him--there is no question that Murdoch is NO CONSERVATIVE!
Who’s on top maybe?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.