Posted on 11/30/2007 10:41:29 PM PST by Phil Harmonic
Why are you telling him how great he is in post 106 and then starting the "is this sarcasm" stuff with him again in post 133?
This time, unlike when Kerry played his game before the Senate, I hope all that admit to crimes are arrested and prosecuted, just to give these guys a clear conscience, you know."
19 posted on 11/30/2007 11:19:14 PM PST by DakotaRed (Liberals don’t rattle sabers, they wave white flags)"
Okay...go with that.
Sorry...meant to ping you.
Okay, my last post on the subject....
DakotaRed (a veteran, a conservative) is simply saying that he hopes these men (liberal, anti-war, John Kerry-types) are jailed for war crimes. Lock them away, take away their ability to vote and infect our society.
It was meant to be an off-the-cuff remark to provoke a little humor in a serious issue. We don’t want to have to deal with these people.
It’s hard enough prosecuting a war on terror without having our own citizens use public relation tactics, legal maneuvers, and rights enumerated in the constitution to make war on our own government. They are counter-productive. But they are necessary in a free and democratic society. But it sure would be nice to lock up these long-haired maggot-infested tree-huggers who intend to subvert the war efforts.
Sunday will be a great day.
Over and out.
Regards, Owen
Try this, then. It's a record of what I'm talking about, posts by you and to you in this thread.
Post 19: DakotaRed says (with obvious sarcasm) that he applauds the new Winter Soldiers for coming forward, and hopes they get locked up immediately.
Now...after you've attacked the guy, apologized, attacked him, apologized and attacked him again, all over the same post, plus apologizing to me and attacking me almost in the same breath, wouldn't you agree that it looks like you have some sort of short term memory problem? Post 23: You tell Dakota that he's a woman with no military experience, is stupid and liberal, and you are reporting him for abuse.
Post 28: you "apologize" to him and call him a Leftist, then cut and paste his post 19.
Post 30: Geopyg posts the first (of many!) messages you will get from various freepers telling you that you've misunderstood Dakota's post.
Post 33: You cry out to the mods, pointing them to post 28 (the reprint of Dakota's post 19) and asking "Are posts like this going to be overlooked?"
Post 36: You tell piasa that if there's any sarcasm in Dakota's original post, you can't see it.
Post 37: Dakota responds to you for the first time, telling you that he has eight years in the Army, including a tour in VietNam. He asks how he could be wishing the Winter Soldier II guys well if he wants them locked up.
Post 38: You point piasa back to your post 28 and ask if that was sarcasm, too.
Post 40: You post the following to Dakota and All: "LOL at me! I didn’t detect the sarcasm. in your post! I’m sorry...I thought you were being derogatory. ‘S’cuse me. ;o)" Hmmm...Post 40 looks to me like you understand that Dakota is a Vietnam vet, that he was engaging in sarcasm and you admit you made an error. Well...apparently not so much. Read on.
Post 43: You apologize again, chalking your defensiveness to living in the Portland area.
Post 48: Dakota apologizes to you in case he came across as condescending.
Post 50: Responding to hsalaw (who had said that Dakota was engaging in sarcasm) you reply, "Thank you...I know that now. ;o)".
Post 52: You thank Dakota for forgiving your stupidity (your words).
Post 58: Making another reading comprehension error, you threaten to have Phil Harmonic banned from FR.
Post 61: Phil Harmonic suggests you stop digging the hole you're in.
Post 63: You tell piasa that you have changed your mind and decided that DakotaRed really did mean that he supported the new Winter Soldier effort.
Post 64: You post to piasa again, telling him you know you apologized, but there was no sarcasm.
Post 65: I ask if you might be inebriated. I've asked this because the man explained himself so plainly that I can't imagine you wouldn't get it if you're of completely sounfd mind.
Post 66: You post the text of Dakota's post 19 back to me.
Post 68: You ask me when the last time you did this was, apparently not remembering anything between posts 19 and 50.
Post 69: I suggest you get a CAT scan, or stop drinking if you in fact have been drinking.
Post 77: You admit FOR A SECOND TIME that you were wrong to take DakotaRed's words as anti-troop, and you add that you are "done." Ah, if only.
Post 81: Only four posts later...FOUR POSTS...you cut and paste Dakota's post 19 and write after it "THAT was NOT sarcasm. SO...what the heck do you mean? Explain, please." This post is directed to Dakota and the Admin Mod, another attempt to get him in trouble for something he didn't do.
Post 82: Owen Kellogg tells you that you should "JUST QUIT!"
Post: 84: You tell Owen you were "taken out of context" whatever that means.
Post 89: Owen Kellogg posts this:
Please go back and read from the beginning.You have turned on several Freepers and deserve to be taken to the woodshed for that.
You apologized for misunderstanding and then started back up.
You said “good night” but you didn’t go nighty-night like you should have.
You keep trying to find a foe where none exists.
Stop it, already. This is embarrassing.
Post 91: You cut and paste Dakota's post 19 and tell Owen Kellogg he must be agreeing with it and if he does he's in the wrong forum. You say that you are on America's side and that you may be the only person on FR who understands waterboarding is not torture.
Post 93: Owen Kellogg says that your reading comprehension hasn't been very good on this thread, and that you should "give it a rest."
Post 94: You admit you may have gotten "ticked off" and say goodnight for the second time.
Post 96: Doing an about face, you tell Owen: "No...I don’t agree with that at all. I’ve seen the doings around here lately."
Post 100: Geopyg points out that "our" Winter Soldiers that would counter the anti-war liars would be "Eagles and others defending our troops."
Post 102: You admit how far off you were on the "our winter soldiers" scuffle, and say for the third time that you're going to bed.
Post 103: DakotaRed also notes that the anti-troop crowd would be counter-protested by Eagles, Patriot Guard riders and other pro-troop organizations.
Post 106: You post the following to DakotaRed:
My husband is a Viet Nam vet, and I will do anything to protect him, wrt his legacy.And yours...
God love you for your service, and for your respect of our current service members.
Post 127: In response to depenzz, you say that you missed Dakota's intent "more than once."
Post 129: You apologize to me for previous behavior.
Post 131: I accept.
Post 132: You thank RetiedArmyMajor for sending me Bible verses and say you think I heard him.
Post 133: FOR THE THIRD TIME you demand to know from DakotaRed if his post 19 is sarcasm or not.
Post 134: Just five posts after apologizing to me, you attack me as a "bully."
I love your explanation.
Thank you so much.
I’m not here enough to thorougly vet things out.
Thank you very much.
You are one anal person.
Give it a rest.
Other than that, let's all recall that we are on the same side and we still have Troops in harm's way. They need our support and as usual, it will most likely be left up to us to scrutinize whoever makes wild claims of war crimes and atrocities, as we all did with Jesse MacBeth and Scott beauchamp. To be sure IVAW will not do it.
And you need--I really really mean this, it is not an insult--NEED to see a neurologist. Your behavior in this thread indicates that you are not processing information in a manner consistent with proper neurological functions. Unless there's substance use involved here, you may actually be very ill.
In fact, because I have become covinced that you have a neuro deficit of some sort, I apologize for any insult I may have sent your way, since I now consider them a case of me unwittingly picking on a sick person. Seriously...you're signs are similar to the ones I saw in my grandmother and great grandmother before they began to suffer neurological damage, and you need to get seen.
Probbly be a good idea to send the FBI in to arrest them on the spot.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.