Skip to comments.U.S. Refuses `Any Wounded Soldier' Mail (Thank Code Pink, Terrorists)
Posted on 12/11/2007 5:56:20 PM PST by Mr. Brightside
Today: December 11, 2007 at 11:25:6 PST
U.S. Refuses `Any Wounded Soldier' Mail
By JAY REEVES
Associated Press Writer
BIRMINGHAM, Ala. (AP) - Hundreds of thousands of holiday cards and letters thanking wounded American troops for their sacrifice and wishing them well never reach their destination. They are returned to sender or thrown away unopened.
Since the Sept. 11 attacks and the anthrax scare, the Pentagon and the Postal Service have refused to deliver mail addressed simply to "Any Wounded Soldier" for fear terrorists or opponents of the war might send toxic substances or demoralizing messages.
Mail must be addressed to a specific member of the armed forces - a rule that pains some well-meaning Americans this Christmas season.
"Are we going to forget our soldiers because we are running in fear?" Fena D'Ottavio asked. The suburban Chicago woman was using her blog to encourage friends to send mail to unspecified soldiers until she learned of the ban, which she called a sad commentary on society.
Last season, despite the rule, officials say as many as 450,000 pieces of mail not addressed to anyone in particular managed to reach Walter Reed Army Medical Center in Washington. But they were returned or, if they had no return address, were thrown out altogether, because the hospital lacked the manpower to open and screen all the mail, spokesman Terry Goodman said.
"A lot of this is because of security concerns because it's unsolicited mail that someone is going to have to go through," Goodman said. "Also, being a democratic society, there could be inappropriate mail from someone who, say, doesn't support the war, and then you've got a wounded soldier getting it."
Lt. Col. Kevin Arata, a spokesman with the Army Human Resources Command, said no one tracks the amount of unnamed-soldier mail being returned, so it is impossible to judge the size of the problem.
The busiest part of the holiday season has yet to arrive, but officials said they are receiving far less mail this year addressed simply to "A Recovering American Soldier" or "Any Wounded Soldier."
Candy Roquemore of Austin, Texas, was also promoting the idea of sending cards to wounded soldiers until she found out about the rule. She suggested the ban is an overreaction.
"I think there are some wackos who might do something, so I can understand that. But I think with a Christmas postcard it would be pretty easy to see it doesn't have anthrax in it," Roquemore said.
She added: "I just wanted to say, `Thank you, sorry you're hurt, and happy holidays.'"
USO spokesman John Hanson said that like the military, the nonprofit service organization does not deliver unopened mail to unspecified recipients. He said the USO worries about security as well as hateful messages from war critics.
"We just want to make sure it's not, `Die, baby killer,'" he said. "There are people out there who act irrationally, and we don't want anyone to get a message that would be discouraging."
The USO is one of the organizations the military is encouraging people to support with donations as an alternative to sending cards to unspecified soldiers. The military is also referring people to the American Red Cross and a Defense Department Web site where supporters have posted thousands of messages to troops.
Some groups are offering to forward mail to the troops. Aides to Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., are offering to accept letters, screen them through the U.S. Capitol mail operation, and get them to members of the armed forces.
"We've had about a dozen complaints from constituents about returned mail that they sent to troops," said Steven Boyd, a Sessions spokesman.
On the Net:
To Our Soldiers: http://www4.army.mil/ocpa/tooursoldiers/
Last year my son and I hand-carried letters to the National Naval Medical Center and Walter Reed. We were invited by security to go right up to the med/surg floors and hand the cards to the nurses at the nursing station cards addressed to “any sailor” “any Marine” or “any soldier”. It would have been a little more inconvenient if we lived more than 30 minutes from Bethesda.
This is absurd.
Maybe Walter Reed can’t open 450,000 pieces of mail, but they could surely open at least SOME of it. Or even most of it, if we are talking about mail arriving over the course of a year.
In truth, the reason is far simpler. While the USPS is able to handle high volumes of mail, the small companies that are subcontracted to handle mail delivery to military hospitals are easily overwhelmed.
So far, the total number of US casualties in Iraq is less than 30,000. Many of these are “returned to duty”, and personnel who have been wounded multiple times, missing one duty day due to injury or illness.
Of those who have been seriously wounded, and returned to the US, many have left the hospital and gone one with their lives. So how many *right now* are in military hospitals?
1,000 to 2,000, as a wild guess. And many of them are outpatients, in for just a few hours at a time.
So what are military hospitals supposed to do if they receive 400,000 get well cards? What about a million or more? If they forwarded them to wounded personnel, they would have a pile of get well cards all over their room several inches deep.
The key is having a valid address for the recipient. We at Proud Patriots have a request page for the troops overseas to tell us what they want, and we try to fill their requests from what gets donated to us.
That’s great, our guys can go to war for our freedom and a bunch of candy-asses are too busy or scared to screen mail that might help them get through the holidays. Just great. What’s next, virtual mail, sanitized for content, through your public affairs officer? We are going due south...
That was the situation at Walter Reed.
“Since the Sept. 11 attacks and the anthrax scare, the Pentagon and the Postal Service have refused to deliver mail addressed simply to “Any Wounded Soldier” for fear terrorists or opponents of the war might send toxic substances or demoralizing messages.”
Sign of the times. The United States - and the world, for that matter - has gone insane.
Why not seek prosecution or at least public exposure of the treasonous Left who'd deliberately demoralize the troops they "claim" to support?
Since we are in a state of war, can't that be the procedure now?
Remember, the military is under civilian CONTROL, but the military has it's own rule of law.