Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Proof Hucakbee is lying about the moving cross
myself | Dec 20, 2007 | Travis McGee

Posted on 12/20/2007 8:59:16 AM PST by Travis McGee

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240241-259 next last
To: Daveinyork

lol!


221 posted on 12/20/2007 2:45:37 PM PST by N3WBI3 (Ah, arrogance and stupidity all in the same package. How efficient of you. -- Londo Mollari)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

His mouth was moving, wasn’t it? Proof enough to me that he was lying!


222 posted on 12/20/2007 2:46:23 PM PST by ssaftler (Which Al is more deadly: Al Qaeda or Al Gore?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

Oh.. My...God..., If you look really close, there appears to be a CHRISTMAS TREE in the video as well.


223 posted on 12/20/2007 2:46:30 PM PST by nkycincinnatikid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

You see a cross in that ad? Strange. Which of the three Roman crosses at this link does it look like to you?

http://www.christiananswers.net/q-abr/abr-a013.html

To me, it looks like a bookshelf. Whoever designed the set might have been trying to give the impression of a symbolic cross, but the actual image is not a Roman cross.

In any event, none of what you’ve written provides any proof that the Huckster knew that was the design purpose. I’m not in favor of his candidacy, but this line of attack is petty and silly.


224 posted on 12/20/2007 2:50:06 PM PST by savedbygrace (SECURE THE BORDERS FIRST (I'M YELLING ON PURPOSE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
You're right, I've watched the video (linked at around reply 35) a few more times, and the perspective on his shoulders does not change. He could move his head to keep his face toward the camera, but his shoulders remain square to the camera. It had to be done with a second, added-on background. It was a "blue-screen" shot of Huck with the shelf/cross added, scrolling behind him.

This is a pretty specific charge, and should be pretty easy to confirm or rebuff. Frankly, I'd like to see it asked and answered by someone directly involved in the production. If it really happened as deliberately as all this, then a pox on Huckabee for lying. (And if it didn't, I assume you'll be issuing your apology forthwith.)
225 posted on 12/20/2007 2:55:56 PM PST by beezdotcom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o
You guys are undoubtedly correct about the technical filming aspect.

I wouldn't be so sure...they've already changed their opinion from tracking-dolly hijinx to bluescreen hijinx. They may ultimately be correct, but I would hardly attach the word 'undoubtedly' at this point.
226 posted on 12/20/2007 3:01:07 PM PST by beezdotcom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies]

To: libbylu

http://www.townhall.com/video/FoxNews/2176_071215-152549_121507_bb_holy_war_F1200


227 posted on 12/20/2007 3:01:21 PM PST by restornu (Harry Reid is going to get Daschled! You're on your own, Harry!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

We can quibble about how long the “cross” was in view; in fact, there’s a symmetrical, Christian cross shape only very briefly - even less than the 8-9 seconds I estimated. Mostly, it’s either almost entirely obliterated or is just two asymmetrical lines of unequal length intersecting at right angles.


228 posted on 12/20/2007 3:02:15 PM PST by Steve_Seattle (|)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Seattle

People see what they most want to be angry about, sometimes. This should get interesting...


229 posted on 12/20/2007 3:03:39 PM PST by beezdotcom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Seattle

P.S. - in the shelf next to the ornaments in the linked photo at the top, I think I see the shadowed face of the Virgin...


230 posted on 12/20/2007 3:04:50 PM PST by beezdotcom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

An artist knows that in any picture/painting, the color red as an accent will draw the eye to that focal point. The red Christmas ornament is very well placed to draw the eye back to the cross. The picture of the cross with the red Christmas ornament accenting it is artistically very professional. Art is my passion and I give kudos to the picture in an artistic sense. We artists use paitings/pictures like storytellers use parables. Visually painted/drawn/photographed symbols are intended to have meaning and convey a message as this subject picture most certainly does.


231 posted on 12/20/2007 3:07:46 PM PST by EverOnward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee
I'm wondering if he's just mistaken. Because it makes no sense for him to lie about it. What's the point? What advantage would be in it for him?

Does he have a history of lying? Do we have any evidence that he just impulsively lies when he doesn't quite know what to say? If not, then I'd assume that he was just genuinely ignorant about the production values of this ad.

232 posted on 12/20/2007 3:08:38 PM PST by Mrs. Don-o (Hmm?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies]

Comment #233 Removed by Moderator

To: savedbygrace

Whether it’s a bookshelf as you think, or a window pane as I thought, I agree that there’s hardly conclusive proof that this was some kind of subliminal message to Christians. There has been nothing subliminal about Huckabee presenting himself as a Christian candidate, or even “the” Christian candidate, so I see no reason for him to enage in some kind of tricky subterfuge to make that point.


234 posted on 12/20/2007 3:11:42 PM PST by Steve_Seattle (|)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 224 | View Replies]

To: rurgan

Sorry boys - the stripes didn’t work.


235 posted on 12/20/2007 3:12:52 PM PST by geopyg (Don't wish for peace, pray for Victory. ------ www.gohunter08.com ------)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

Would you say the cross-shapes in the windows at the left side of the pic in post #49 were deliberate attempts to put subliminal Christian crosses into the picture?


236 posted on 12/20/2007 3:19:59 PM PST by Steve_Seattle (|)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies]

To: beezdotcom
But isn't this a kerfuffle over nothing, really?

See my tagline.

237 posted on 12/20/2007 3:29:50 PM PST by Mrs. Don-o (Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies]

To: N3WBI3

Bookshelf? I am an idiot. I thought it was a shot of a window.


238 posted on 12/20/2007 4:12:14 PM PST by Sweet_Sunflower29 (Dear Santa, I can explain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies]

To: EverOnward

Thanks for the artist’s input. I agree.


239 posted on 12/20/2007 4:28:42 PM PST by Travis McGee (---www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com---)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 231 | View Replies]

To: N3WBI3

In that case, I have you down for incompetence. Personally, I’m leaning toward obfuscation, but your mileage may vary.


240 posted on 12/20/2007 4:37:15 PM PST by LadyNavyVet (An independent Freeper, not paid by any political campaign.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 193 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240241-259 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson