Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tlaloc
OK, I just don't get it.

We've been told for a few months now by MANY FReepers that Huck is a "liberal conservative Evangelical."

Why, if his liberalness so outweighed his conservative aspect; if his NEA endorsement trumped other stuff; then why wouldn't the PFAW NOT be jumpin' up & down with a congratulatory press release?

Can these Huck "labelers" please explain this to the rest of us?

9 posted on 01/04/2008 12:05:12 PM PST by Colofornian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Colofornian

All this shows is that for PFAW social conservatism is more important than fiscal liberalism.


12 posted on 01/04/2008 12:07:43 PM PST by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Colofornian
Can these Huck "labelers" please explain this to the rest of us?

Yes, you may be shocked to learn the MSM and liberal interest groups don't care about the facts on Huck.

Ever since Jerry Falwell supported Ronald Reagan the left has been claiming the Republican Party is in the hip pocket of evangelical Christians. It was inevitable they would spin Huck's victory that way.

Does it really surprise you the left loathes Huck the Evangelical as much as you loath Mitt the Mormon?

17 posted on 01/04/2008 12:30:13 PM PST by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson