I feel that all people should be allowed to participate in the Boy Scouts of America regardless of sexual orientation …
There he goes again, trying to have it both ways.
Posted on 01/07/2008 6:18:49 AM PST by xzins
I haven’t seen you answer the question everyone has been asking you: who will be the Republican nominee?
Add in that the headline was tampered with and it all equals desperation.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1949306/posts
Fred Thompson: Romneycare At A Glance
Excerpt:
KEY ASPECTS OF ROMNEY’S MASSACHUSETTS HEALTH CARE PLAN...
(1) Guarantees Planned Parenthood A Seat At The Table. Romney’s legislation created an advisory board and guarantees, by law, that Planned Parenthood has a seat at the table. Romney’s plan established a MassHealth payment policy advisory board, and one member of the Board must be from Planned Parenthood. No pro-life organization is represented. (Chapter 58 Section 3 (q) Section 16M (a), http://www.mass.gov/legis/laws/seslaw06/sl060058.htm )
I feel that all people should be allowed to participate in the Boy Scouts of America regardless of sexual orientation …
There he goes again, trying to have it both ways.
That would be better directed to those that join the club ;)
I didn’t expect a sensible response from you and didn’t get one.
Romney was endorsed by the Log Cabin Republicans in 1994 and 2002.
I can’t help what affiliations and agendas they have.
Do you think that don’t ask, don’t tell will NOT eventually lead to gays serving openly in the military?
I do. Whether I want it to happen or not, I’m convinced that it will.
Of course, in 1994 most of us thought don’t ask, don’t tell would lead to gays serving openly by now, and we were wrong.
But already we are seeing signs that poeople are NOT being discharged for admitting to homosexuality. The military is adapting to the idea, and it started when the policy became that gays were accepted in the military just so long as they didn’t tell anybody about it.
One day the military leadership is going to decide that gays are not disruptive anymore, or at least not as disruptive as the current policy, and gays will serve openly in the military.
I could be wrong, but it’s what I expect to happen.
Then you are the fool for asking :)
And now they attack him. But apparently THAT doesn’t count.
“And I’ve been very clear on that. I will preserve and protect a woman’s right to choose …” Mitt Romney
I didn’t ask anything.
Can you not read?
The rules here are that if FRed! has changed his mind or his position on an issue or even hints at doing so, it is genuine.
If Mitt comes to see the light on an issue, it is not genuine and he will be flogged with his former position in perpetuity.
I didn’t say anything about membership, so I don’t know why you think I did. Maybe somebody else did. It wasn’t me. I merely pointed out the mud you must have to crawl out of to try to associate Mitt Romney with NAMBLA.
“issue is the same agenda” — as a conservative, I should hope that you realise how liberal that is, trying to tie people to evildoers based on some common issue.
Maybe you missed the last two years when all the conservatives were being smeared as supporting the KKK because the KKK opposes illegal immigration, just like we do.
No, it doesn’t. And I told you why already.
Sure can. You asked for a sensible response. You want me to answer the next question, “Can you not read?”?
You forgot to follow that up with, “So THERE! HA! NEENER, NEENER!”
I think post 139 stole the sensible response you were looking for. Check there.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.