Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The New York Times has some damaging goods on John McCain, reportedly involving a female lobbyist.
AmSpecBlog ^ | 1/14/08 | Quin Hillyer

Posted on 01/14/2008 1:08:18 PM PST by TBBT

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-115 next last
FYI... Now if this was Romney, Thompson, or Guliani... Do you think the Times would have backed off?
1 posted on 01/14/2008 1:08:20 PM PST by TBBT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TBBT

This would have been unloaded two days before the election for sure. No wonder they want McCain.


2 posted on 01/14/2008 1:10:32 PM PST by lone star annie (Why are they so afraid of Duncan Hunter?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBBT

Too bad papers are not covered by the Freedom of Information Act to force the story out. They manipulate stories as bad or worse than the government to push their agenda.


3 posted on 01/14/2008 1:11:18 PM PST by Resolute Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBBT
OK, so he switches parties, Bill endorses him, Hillary rolls over and McCain is President.

It could happen...

4 posted on 01/14/2008 1:12:00 PM PST by Doctor Raoul (Abolish the CIA, give the job to the Free Clinic who know how to stop leaks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBBT

They’ll back off till he wins.


5 posted on 01/14/2008 1:12:01 PM PST by ontap (Just another backstabbing conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBBT

Someone else must know and could release it?


6 posted on 01/14/2008 1:12:02 PM PST by Ulysse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBBT

I have some damaging goods on Quin Hillyer, involving her fat promiscious mom


7 posted on 01/14/2008 1:13:01 PM PST by Constantine XIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ulysse

I was just going to say the exact same thing!


8 posted on 01/14/2008 1:13:49 PM PST by mickeylee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Ulysse

Yeah, c’mon! If this info really exists, then there is no way it will remain a secret. This is the age of the internet, for goodness sake.

Where is Drudge?


9 posted on 01/14/2008 1:13:58 PM PST by Pining_4_TX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TBBT

So is this the sex scandal involving a Senator/Prez candidate that was hinted at a few weeks ago?


10 posted on 01/14/2008 1:14:00 PM PST by LibFreeOrDie (L'Chaim!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBBT

I wonder who McCain will blame for this.....cause we know he never blames himself for any mistake he makes. See Amnesty, Campaign Finance Reform, Bush tax cuts, Keating Five, etc etc etc.


11 posted on 01/14/2008 1:14:00 PM PST by Badeye (No thanks, Huck, I'm not whitewashing the fence for you this election cycle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBBT

Never.


12 posted on 01/14/2008 1:14:26 PM PST by Dante3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBBT

What? He couldn’t get it up


13 posted on 01/14/2008 1:14:53 PM PST by ImJustAnotherOkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBBT

It looks as though Google has stopped issuing a warning about the American Spectator’s site. For a while, a search for the site would return a warning about malware.


14 posted on 01/14/2008 1:15:34 PM PST by dr.zaeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibFreeOrDie

I recall the LA Times was sitting on such a story. Seems like a couple very liberal papers are protecting someone.


15 posted on 01/14/2008 1:16:04 PM PST by GnL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Constantine XIII

Quin is a chick? An Eskimo, I know, but I thought male.


16 posted on 01/14/2008 1:16:17 PM PST by pissant (Duncan Hunter: Warrior, Statesman, Conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TBBT

Back in October there was a thread about the LATimes having “dirt” on one of the Presidential candidates (it didn’t say which party.) Here’s the thread:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1919063/posts


17 posted on 01/14/2008 1:18:22 PM PST by dawn53
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBBT

If it were “goods” on Hillary and a female lobbyist? Never see the light of day. McCain ain’t my choice, although I could possibly vote for him if absolutely necessary, but the NYT wouldn’t change my mind either way.


18 posted on 01/14/2008 1:18:42 PM PST by Emmett McCarthy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBBT

I say McCain confronts it head on......


19 posted on 01/14/2008 1:18:56 PM PST by vavavah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBBT

Hell, I’ve got a ton of flak on McCain. Trouble is everyone here knows about it.


20 posted on 01/14/2008 1:20:02 PM PST by wolfcreek (The Status Quo Sucks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-115 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson