Skip to comments.Ron Paul and the Lodestar of Liberty
Posted on 01/14/2008 8:04:27 PM PST by forkinsocket
Ron Paul is not a nut. He is honorable and intelligent. I have talked with Congressman Paul about politics and policies. He is consistent and principled. Much of what he says is true. The Constitution is routinely ignored by politicians of both political parties. Government spending, particularly entitlements, is wildly out of control. The crucial constitutional concepts of federalism and limited government are tacitly denied and this denial is the crux of many of our social and political problems.
But Ron Paul holds the vain hope that American government would return to constitutional law anytime soon, even if he did win the presidency. Congress, the judiciary, legal education, and tradition have imparted momentum to the living constitution school of thought. Bring about an actual return to the Constitution requires more than a snap of the president's fingers. Federal courts routinely "interpret" the Constitution in ways directly in conflict with the plain language of the document. At best, a president can only appoint judges the Senate will confirm and wait for natural turnover.
A lot of persuasion is necessary before Americans (including our elites and their institutions) change their way thinking. We in fact still need a crusade to change hearts and minds more than a candidacy.
And if we are going to return to first principles, remember that the Constitution is not the foundational document of our American experiment in individual liberty. It was preceded by the Articles of Confederation. Prior to the Articles of Confederation, which were adopted after independence, the Continental Congress acted as the original government of the United States and successfully waged a war against the great superpower on the planet with very little real authority. The fundamental principles of American government were established long the Constitution was adopted.
What does matter is the Declaration of Independence. The divine endowment of all people with liberty comes directly out of this document of 1776 and it is to this document that serious friends of liberty should look for inspiration and restoration. And what was the Declaration of Independence? It was, in effect, a declaration of war against the British Empire.
It was not an isolationist document but a universalist document. It speaks, pointedly, to the rest of the world. It talks about the reasons that governments are formed (not just our government.) It was bold, sweeping, and international. And it was seen by the rest of the world as just that: A revolutionary document for all peoples, even if it applied specifically only to thirteen embattled colonies in North American.
Ron Paul wants to return us to the Constitution, as if it were a sacred document which granted us freedom. Our spiritual lodestar should be the Declaration of Independence, which remains a much more dangerous, much more powerful, and much more relevant document to our times.
Some policies Paul proposes are admirable. Why do we still have armies in Germany and in Korea, when both are rich, modern industrialized nations? Why does government have to do so much and why does "government" more and more mean centralized government in Washington? Why have a tax code which punishes productivity and which requires contortionist behavior from business?
But other parts of Paul's policies simply do not fit our age. The notion that we should disengage from the Middle East, for example, suggests that Israel is "just another nation," like, say, North Korea or Syria. The foundation of the Jewish state was based upon the undeniable facts of history continuing, dreadfully, through the Holocaust, that Jews are not "just another people," but are rather a persecuted people who were not welcome when escaping Nazified Europe. Ignoring that is ignoring salient history.
Likewise, the stark contrast between Israel and its neighbors (except, until the last three decades, the successful state of Lebanon) cannot be ignored, and the murderous intent of neighbors who seriously read in large numbers Mein Kampf and the Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion is also a grim, absolute fact of the modern world. The notion that, on paper, Israel can make peace with these neighbors is not just pure theory, but it is theory which has failed the test of experience.
Paul also seems to doubt that people wish to do America harm because it is America, and that nuclear weapons change everything. Ever since H.G. Wells first used the term "atomic bomb" in his science fiction stories more than a century ago, it has become almost inevitable that true, horrific global war power was inevitable. Happily, America acquired fission weapons and then fusion weapons first. Happily also, America has had leaders willing to use that power to protect our nation and allies who would otherwise be unprotected.
And, as we learned from the Japanese in the Second World War and from radical Moslems today, the calculus of economic benefits and political rights which works very well in moderating and balancing the behavior of most people, simply does not work with everyone. Does anyone doubt that the Japanese would have used the atomic bomb on American cities or that radical Moslems will use thermonuclear bombs on America, if they can, even if it means massive casualties in our retaliation?
Liberty can no longer stand safely behind two vast oceans and decent men can no longer ignore their human brethren after Hitler, Stalin and Mao. As Lincoln today might have said "This world cannot long endure half slave and half free." This was also perhaps the greatest victory of the greatest conservative leader of our age: Ronald Reagan. Congressman Paul might recall the Gipper's Cold War strategy: "How about this: We win; they lose?"
Ronald Reagan, like Abraham Lincoln, understood the supra-constitutional importance of liberty in the fulfillment of America, and liberty to them meant more than just the liberty of American citizens. If the ideal which is America is to survive the totalitarian impulse which we see not only in North Korea and the Taliban, but among the Leftists in our own nation, then we need to recapture the fortitude of Washington, the vision of Lincoln and the clarity of Reagan. If we can do this and preserve the vestiges of the Constitution, fine.
But the vision of America is much more than the Constitution. It is much more than Congressman Paul sees. What Ron Paul proposes is not bad or dishonest. It is simply no longer enough for liberty and decency to survive in America or in the world.
If China wants to retake Formosa there is nothing the U.S. could do short of getting into a full scale war with her.
Pulling ALL our troops out from the entire world?
Iran has no army??
And he entertains 9-11 conspiracy whacks?. Bzzzzzzzt Your time is up.
Yes, the world will end if the U.S. pulls back and lets the regions handle their own problems.
Ofcourse, if we don't, the United States will destroy itself by going bankrupt.
The world will not end. The ‘pax americana’ will.
We would ofcourse continue diplomatic relations with all nations that chose to have them.
You anti-Ron Paul zealots sure love straw men don't you!
I am on the side of America, the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution.
Which side are you on?
Yes, it looks like you are against the Declaration and the Constitution.
Ben Franklin the Ron Paul straw man. I’m sure you don’t speak for all RP supporters as they have no sane coherent option. The contradictions are generally dead on arrival to sane minds. I’d really like some of those blinders you all have there...
Exactly so. The good thing is China knows this also. Has since...well Formosa’s been Formosa!
Which means the good people of Formosa get to go along living their lives on an Island that’s NOT right up there at the top of the worst human rights abuses list...
along with South Korea, Japan, Phillipines...etc. etc. etc.
“If Ron Paul gets his way, they will.”
You mean threaten us like they did when China said they would nuke us a few years ago during Bushes term? or when China took out one of our spy planes and gave Bush an early schooling in ‘diplomacy’. Or when China offered to give us the right half of the Pacific ocean after surfacing a sub in the middle of our Naval Exercise? Or when Russia basically is rebuilding it’s entire military, is rich in oil, threatened us with routine and has visited and backed Iran against us. Remember when Bush indicated that Putin was threatening WW3? Or when NK started launching missiles over Japan? or when Saudi Arabia takes over our banks with China because their economic warfare against us is working? How bout when russia, chinese and the saudis gives our enemies weapons, money, intel as well as men to fight against us in the hot spots.
I’m just curious where what foreign events regarding those two countries you’ve been watching?
Ofcourse, if we don’t, the United States will destroy itself by going bankrupt.
Nope, that was the USSR when Reagan built cruise missiles and the soviets collapsed.
I should hope that you haven't heard about it. They've been overtly testing it and all. These past years. Damn dude...
Oh, I know they have been testing it, but I haven't seen alot of action in actually getting one in place.
and how about:
Second, why shouldn’t 9/11 be investigated to see where the government failed?
what was that...oh yeah the 9-11 commission...that’s the ticket!!!!!!
We need one of THOSE!
Right after we get all these crack houses legalized and quit this stoopid war on drugs! LOL
Iran has no army that can defeat Israel.
Pulling out our troops of the other nations of the world and bring them back to the United States.
He doesn't entertain 9-11 conspiracy theory and has stated that very clearly.
So, like all anti-Ron Paul zealots you are wrong three out of three times.
But Anti-RP zealots are never really worried about the truth, only in spreading falsehoods and half-truths.
But you are always clever in your use of sound effects.