Skip to comments.Where do all the Fred-heads go? [Free Republic poll cited]
Posted on 01/23/2008 7:49:01 AM PST by rface
So far, Mitt Romney is winning overwhelming support, according to a poll at FreeRepublic.com, which had been a place where Fred Thompson's supporters congregated.
(Excerpt) Read more at video1.washingtontimes.com ...
“Should we surrender the war on terror in exchange for smaller government?”
What war on terror?
Our borders are wide open.
We send Palestinian Fatah terrorists arms and money, and encourage them by pressuring Israel to give up half of Jerusalem - after we forced them out of Gaza, giving Hamas a huge victory. Now we pressure Israel to send fuel and food to Hamas who shoots missiles at them every day.
We continue to let thousands of military age male Muslim foreign exchange students into our country year after year.
We import Muslim somnali tribesmen as “refugees” by the boatload. Here in Phoenix, they all seem to work at the airport. I’m not kidding.
So much for, fight them over there so we don’t have to fight them here.
“Im all for smaller government, but pacifism is the last thing that we need right now.”
What’s the alternative, borrow another $ trillion from China to use to fight their client, Iran? Then the dollar can fall further down the sinkhole and we’ll really lose.
That’s a serious question, btw. Not rhetorical.
We have national guard protecting Iraq’s border. Why not ours?
We aren’t taking the threat seriously now.
What Paul proposes is a net improvement. It took me a while to come to that conclusion, but I think the facts support it.
” Imagine the D.C. gun ban case or any other case of a Constitutional issue being decided by such a Court.”
Bush’s DOJ filed an amicus brief SUPPORTING the DC gun ban.
Kasich? No way, no how. I ain't a votin' fer that varmint. He's a Rino, an' a commie an' he voted agin' puppies and bluebirds. 'Sides that he farts in Church. Stinky ones.
. . . Yeah.
You’re right. I was just trying to throw in the obscure reference to political activity not being a dinner party. :)
We’ll just have to disagree on that.
Well, now you can understand why. I don’t think he’s lying about it, because nobody has come forward and said he was lying about it.
As someone else explained, it’s not an indictment of Thompson. It just suggests that at the start, they were seeing if he could get support for VP, and then he caught fire, and decided he had the support to be President.
Anyway, if Carl knew that, it would have been a factor in everything he wrote and said about the campaign.
I was for Fred.
Huckabee is my 2nd choice.
Romney would be my 3rd choice.
McCain would be at the bottom of the list. Unfortunately, I believe he will be our next President. If it’s between him and Clinton/Obama I’ll put a bag, hold my nose and vote for the guy.
Sorry, it’s an article from the Washington Times that actually mentions Free Republic.
A News article mentioning the site is NEVER spam.
That’s how I’ve felt for the last couple of months. Except I was never sure if I’d be allowed to stay in the camp, and whenever someone saw me they’d tell me I should leave.
My guess is Fred will not endorse Mccain. And given their friendship, AND the fact that Fred endorsed McCain in 2000, that lack of endorsement will speak volumes about how Fred feels about McCain’s run for President.
If Fred thought McCain would be a good President, he’d endorse him — Fred’s got no other friends in the race.
But if Fred DID NOT think McCain would be a good President, Fred would withhold his endorsement. But out of friendship, Fred may not give that endorsement to anybody else either.
That is wrong, Jorge is really special, he has raised back stabbing to a new art form. And sadly the person you support is the same way.
You answered your own comment.
In looking at the current slate of remaining GOP candidates...it might be a good thing to be outside the Republican party mainstream...since Fred dropped out, I've been looking at Paul and he sounds more like Fred than any of the other guys.
More or less. But "just not eat" is not an option, unless you are willing to leave the country. If you don't vote, others will choose what you will eat for you.
Imagine the D.C. gun ban case or any other case of a Constitutional issue being decided by such a Court.
“Bushs DOJ filed an amicus brief SUPPORTING the DC gun ban.”
I’m aware of the brief. Let’s see what the Court decides - at least we have a fighting chance. The point is that we must consider the appointments to the Court for situations such as this.
Appointments to the Court are arguably the most important issue in this election - considering the age of some justices.
Are you also forgetting ROMNEYCARE???? MANDATORY insurance and a fine on your tax return this year if you have not signed up -- and it has already overwhelmed the system and the waiting list to see a doctor is growing, just like in Europe where you wait two years for something as simple as a hearing test, There isn't a bit of difference in McCain or Romney and the democrats..
Thompson stated flatly during the campaign that he wasn’t interested in being Veep. Staffers say he was. Staffers are also looking for jobs right now, and getting their names in the press will help, so I take their breathless “inside baseball” statements for what they’re worth.
If Thompson wanted to be McCain’s Veep, he’d have endorsed McCain. I’m sure McCain asked for an endorsement after the SC primary. McCain needs conservatives onboard and may have thought that Thompson was a way to get them. The silence from Thompson has been deafening, and should stop all the unwarranted speculation.
Lots of conservative federal judges
Tax cuts (with no support from a republican congress to make them permanent)
No new taxes
That’s what we got from Bush. Sorry it wasn’t everything you wanted but since when do you ever get that in the real world?
Since reading isn’t your strong point I guess I won’t bother addressing my support for Romney.
Yup. The PTB have finally manipulated the process to the point where they can't lose. No matter what, the agenda will advance.
You say wrong. You poor deluded soul.
Reagan was never pro-choice. He was always pro-life. He went from no abortions except for the health of the mother to no abortions except for the life of the mother.
Romney supported a woman's "right" to choose to kill her child for any reason imaginable. That made Mitt pro-choice, while Reagan was always pro-life. It is amazing how well Romney has brainwashed some people.
He's also the only pro-lifer left in the race. See the tagline.
And that Norma McCovey, she must hate those pesky coloreds too. I mean she's only one of the leading proponents to end a practice that disproportionately kills black babies. Err, wait...
Regardless of whether Williams endorsed Paul or not, he's absolutely right about this.
“SO- If Fred one day endorses McCain .... will that make Fred a RINO too???”
I say this as a Fred head until he dropped out, YES!
“I am actually starting to like Mitt Romney. I hope he will be gentle.”
Mitt seems like the cuddling, “give-ya-a-reach-around” kind of guy.
Not sure I could bring myself to vote for a Democrat, but I understand the sentiment.
Generally speaking, RINOs don't become RINOs by one act or statement. Fred won't become a RINO, he'll only show that he may have been one, all along. May, have been one, all along.
While we've been sold on the "friendship" between Fred and McCain, we honestly don't know what the nature of that relationship is, colored not just by the Senate Club Members Only mentality, but the Senate Banking hearings of 1996, and what Fred knows about Mrs. Clinton. He clearly must have thought McCain wasn't sufficiently convervative, or as driven on issues, or something, or he wouldn't have run.
Fred's no longer the issue, "my friends," as Captain Queeg likes to say. Whether he's a RINO or not is sort of beside the point, isn't it?
If this is too blind for your taste, consult some well-meaning fool (there is always one around) and ask his advice. Then vote the other way. This enables you to be a good citizen (if such is your wish) without spending the enormous amount of time on it that truly intelligent exercise of franchise requires.
This one sure isn't.
Since the candidates left are mods and libs
Do a write in for your primaries and have a brokered convention.
That is the way they use to be until the media started picking our candidates.
The most amazing result of the current polling is that “Anyone but Mitt” finished last with only 14 Freepers and 7 non-members taking that stand. There’s a lot of anti-Mitt postings on this board for so few votes. All I can guess is that many anti-Mitt types must also be anti-some one else and thus chose “None of the above” as the energy they display makes it unlikely they’d pass on voting here.
Fredheads could help to
Re-draft Duncan Hunter into the Presidential Race
I will never vote for anyone who is not strong on defense or fighting our enemies. Dr. Paul is neither.
Yeah, maybe, but he’s there ~ and on time too!
Romney is purty and has a big fat wallet. He's dreamy, dontcha know.
Considering what happened to the last guy we “all supported”...
does anyone really CARE????
Fred was clearly the best choice.. for most of us.
But not for enough of those people actually voting for him in the primaries.
It was a blast to play. Of course, I had to use lots of nuclear weapons in-country to win, the radioactive cleanup took me the remainder of the game and beyond.
I guess will need a lot of mops....
If you once were for abortion you can NEVER EVER change?
Bull shiite! Do any of you anti Mitt people believe he will appoint a judge that is in favor? This is a northeat thing people. In America above the Mason Dixon Line you can only be just so Republican and win. Below you can only be just so rat and win. While there are exceptions that’s general rule. This does mean that Mitt will give us another ruth buzzi ginsberg.
Nobody is buying your lies and distortions. How many times do you have to be told that?
I’m not going anywhere until I vote. I say keep them guessing and working for my vote. And, after the candidate is chosen, I will not be working for him. I will simply be working against the other side. Same as in ‘04.
Don’t believe everything you read.
Who is “our?”
It’s time for more restaurant choices.
Don’t believe everything you read. I happen to know firsthand that there were moles in FRed’s staff trying to undermine his campaign.
That’s where all these false rumors were coming from.
I believe the title of the thread has Fred’s name in it.
Do a write in for your primaries and have a brokered convention.I'm with you as far as the brokered convention, but there's another way to get there besides a write-in campaign, and that's by spreading the delegates around among various candidates. Since Mitt is presently the leader and seems likely to gain the most from Fred's having dropped out, that means voting for a candidate other than Mitt who has a real shot at denying him a particular state's delegates but no shot at all of winning the delegates needed to secure the nomination prior to the convention.
In my state, New York, that would mean Rudy.