Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Disenfranchised conservatives, stolen elections
Renew America ^ | January 24, 2008 | JR Dieckmann

Posted on 01/24/2008 9:47:43 PM PST by Graybeard58

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121 next last

1 posted on 01/24/2008 9:47:44 PM PST by Graybeard58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58
If we are ever again to have fair elections in this country, then primary elections are going to have to be standardized and held on the same day in all states

I have no idea why they're not done this way, since we can certainly manage to hold a presidential election on the same day across the country.

2 posted on 01/24/2008 9:51:05 PM PST by Darkwolf377 (Pro-Life atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

Disenfranchised Conservative Voter. A DCV—pretty much sums it up.


3 posted on 01/24/2008 9:51:17 PM PST by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

For God’s sake, will you Republicans LISTEN????????


4 posted on 01/24/2008 9:55:20 PM PST by DeLaine (Let me know if anything I say offends you, I may want to offend you again later.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

Good article! Exactly my sentiments! I cannot, for the life of me, figure out who to vote for in FL primary! I’d tend to go with Ann’s choice, but I don’t agree with her on her choice and I cannot understand what she didn’t like with Fred or Duncan. I was shocked when she picked Romney!


5 posted on 01/24/2008 10:01:42 PM PST by Shery (in APO Land)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377

The reason they are not standardized is that the federal government does not have control over the primary elections - and the states have no incentive to standardize them. They benefit from the exaggerated and brief attention generated by the primary frenzy within their borders. The increase in room tax revenues alone in New Hampshire is probably a huge boost to a place that would disappear from everyone’s attention span if we went to a national primary.


6 posted on 01/24/2008 10:03:10 PM PST by Wally_Kalbacken (Seldom right but never in doubt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

In this election cycle, the process was taken one step further. Poll results are generated by the MSM, and the MSM demonstrates a huge liberal bias and they obviously tilted the polls to show anticonservative results. Those polls were used to exclude the most conservative candidate from the debates in the EARLIEST PRIMARIES. So, we had biased media conducting biased polls and using that biased data to exclude the candidate they didn’t like, even though he had won a delegate and some of those jerks who had higher poll results hadn’t a single delegate to their name.

On Poll Results and the End of Conservatism
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1951282/posts


7 posted on 01/24/2008 10:03:26 PM PST by Kevmo (We need to get rid of the Kennedy Wing of the Republican Party. ~Duncan Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

Good Grief! This author has put to words exactly the discussions in this house. Every word is identical. Every thought is identical.

WOW!

Good article by the way.


8 posted on 01/24/2008 10:05:34 PM PST by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists...call 'em what you will...They ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wally_Kalbacken
The reason they are not standardized is that the federal government does not have control over the primary elections

I understand, I mean "why" in the larger sense. The answer of course is that the earlier states like the money that flows into them--thus, the states that care more about getting a few more bucks for themselves are in the position of choosing the nominee for ALL of us. Wow, how's that for patriotism?

9 posted on 01/24/2008 10:08:26 PM PST by Darkwolf377 (Pro-Life atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

btt


10 posted on 01/24/2008 10:12:16 PM PST by Cacique (quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat ( Islamia Delenda Est ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377

My primary isn’t until May 20th. By then, the real process will be over. I’m being disenfranchised.


11 posted on 01/24/2008 10:12:47 PM PST by Dianna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58
>>>>>A mass exodus from the Republican Party, now on the heels of Thompson's departure, would send a clear message to the party leadership that they have gone astray and are on the verge of collapse if they don't come back to the conservative base.

Forget the message, there is no conservative gonna get elected in November. I'd love for a candidate to step forward and pull 25% of Republicans away from the party trappings and tell the elitists, adios amigos.

12 posted on 01/24/2008 10:29:38 PM PST by Reagan Man (FUHGETTABOUTIT Rudy....... Conservatives don't vote for liberals!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377

Primaries and caucuses are purely internal party affairs used to choose a candidate, which involved the States ONLY because the two major parties were successful in using the State general election machinery, money and polling place for FREE. This has allowed the State Legislatures to meddle in internal party matters.

The National Republican Party at the 2008 Convention could choose to CHANGE to way that the Republican Primaries are funded, when they are conducted and WHO can vote in said same primaries or caucases.

The States do not need to do anything, the Republican Party at the 2008 Convention needs to do something about 2012, in addition to selecting a 2008 Presidential and Vice-Presidential ticket.

dvwjr


13 posted on 01/24/2008 10:32:02 PM PST by dvwjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Dianna
My primary isn’t until May 20th. By then, the real process will be over. I’m being disenfranchised.

Quit whining. You very well may get to decide this thing.

14 posted on 01/24/2008 10:32:09 PM PST by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

Somehow, it’s gotten to the point where candidates are expected to campaign for 2 years before the first primary or caucus day even occurs. Then everything’s over and decided 2 weeks later!

Plus, early open primaries screw us really good!


15 posted on 01/24/2008 10:33:25 PM PST by LibFreeOrDie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

These are word for word the comments of the Keyes, Bauer and Forbes supporters in 2000.

You go to war with the Army you have. It was Bush in 2000 and that victory got us John Roberts, Samuel Alito, sharp tax cuts and a permanent military presence on the 2nd largest oil reserves in the world.

If Gore had been elected we would have NONE of that. None. Not a single item.

You go to war with the Army you have. Romney is going to be the Army this year.

Prepare for battle.


16 posted on 01/24/2008 10:37:47 PM PST by Owen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe
Quit whining. You very well may get to decide this thing.

Now that could be interesting.

17 posted on 01/24/2008 10:42:13 PM PST by Dianna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58
Conservatives are loyal to their values and beliefs, not to a political party. The Republican Party no longer shares those values and beliefs and no longer deserves the support of conservatives...A mass exodus from the Republican Party, now on the heels of Thompson's departure, would send a clear message to the party leadership that they have gone astray

Alas, they've melded with the Democrats so far and for so long that they would now regard the departure of conservatives as that irritating burr known as ethics and conscious removed from their saddle. Free at last to romp with the donkeys in the fields of big government socialism and free to bite the constituents who fed them!

But how do we establish and sustain a Conservative Party in an environment where the ruling two have jiggered the rules to insure no third party has a chance? The "winner take all" delegate system is the largest hurdle to overcome.

18 posted on 01/24/2008 10:44:55 PM PST by NewRomeTacitus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58
Good rant. I have a few quibbles.

First, Fred Thompson was the guy who shot Fred Thompson. I liked Fred's positions, but he made a bunch of miscalculations. There was a lot of support for him, but everyone else was running for a year before he laced up his shoes. He campaigned like he was disinterested in the whole process.

Duncan Hunter never got out of single digits. Heck, he barely got to single digits. I know the MSM wouldn't cover him, but if he was really electable, he would have figured out a way to make his name better known than the guy who played Squiggy on Laverne and Shirley.

Okay, here's the news flash: There are not enough conservatives to swing an election without forming a coalition with other people.

We've been running a circular firing squad since 1992. Pat Buchanan started it. Bush wasn't good enough for Buchanan, so he threw a tantrum and broke up the Republican party. Good for him. He blasted Bush and weakened him enough that Perot could finish him off. After doing his best to destroy the Republican party, he picked up his dolly and dishes and went to Perot's Reform party, helping to break it up.

Everybody CLAIMS they want Reagan to come back. Well, how about bringing back this part of Reagan's philosophy: "Thou shalt not speak ill of another Republican." Let's debate issues, stand for principles, and seek the best candidate we can. When that is done, let's put aside animosity and work to elect our candidate.

19 posted on 01/24/2008 10:54:03 PM PST by Richard Kimball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58
Yet the Republican leadership will never challenge the legitimacy of elections or the likelihood of voter fraud on the part of the Democrats.

The RNC rakes in much more money when the Democrats are in office. When their liberal RINOs are in office, they get mostly Nada Pesos ™.

20 posted on 01/24/2008 10:59:42 PM PST by meadsjn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson