Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tulsa Ramjet

RE: “not exactly”

I’m not sure how what you’re saying conflicts with what I’m saying. I said that you are assessed a value and are taxed on that value. That value, whether driven by the market, the assessor, etc. takes your view into account as part of that and you are then taxed, in part, on the view; a better view is going to result in a higher valuation, and a worse (relative) view a lesser one.


28 posted on 01/30/2008 9:25:59 AM PST by ECM (Government is a make-work program for lawyers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: ECM

I guess what I’m trying to say is that one needs to drill down a little further on what creates the assessment, rather than allude that the tax is created by an assessment. is it small potatoes? probably unless you want to fight the assessment, which if most people did, they would be paying less, especially if prices in their area was deflated.


57 posted on 01/30/2008 5:37:04 PM PST by Tulsa Ramjet ("If not now, when?" "Because it's judgment that defeats us.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson