Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rush Limbaugh LIVE Radio Thread - Thursday 1/31/08
The EIB Network ^ | January 31, 2008 | Rush Limbaugh

Posted on 01/31/2008 8:40:44 AM PST by TSchmereL

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 461-480481-500501-520521-535 next last
To: AGreatPer

McCain’s running mate choices:

McCain-Kennedy
McCain-Feingold
McCain-Lieberman


501 posted on 01/31/2008 11:43:55 AM PST by counterpunch (McCain/Kennedy '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 496 | View Replies]

To: Kerretarded
Barroom Economics

This is real life math to understand our tax system.

Suppose that every day, ten men go out for beer and the bill for all ten comes to $100. If they paid their bill the way we pay our taxes, it would go something like this:

The first four men (the poorest) would pay nothing.
The fifth would pay $1.
The sixth would pay $3.
The seventh would pay $7.
The eighth would pay $12.
The ninth would pay $18.
The tenth man (the richest) would pay $59.

So, that's what they decided to do.

The ten men drank in the bar every day and seemed quite happy with the arrangement, until one day, the owner threw them a curve. "Since you are all such good customers," he said, "I'm going to reduce the cost of your daily beer by $20." Drinks for the ten now cost just $80. The group still wanted to pay their bill the way we pay our taxes so the first four men were unaffected. They would still drink for free.

But what about the other six men - the paying customers? How could they divide the $20 windfall so that everyone would get his 'fair share?'

They realized that $20 divided by six is $3.33. But if they subtracted that from everybody's share, then the fifth man and the sixth man would each end up being paid to drink his beer. So, the bar owner suggested that it would be fair to reduce each man's bill by roughly the same amount, and he proceeded to work out the amounts each should pay. And so:

The fifth man, like the first four, now paid nothing (100% savings).
The sixth now paid $2 instead of $3 (33%savings).
The seventh now pay $5 instead of $7 (28%savings).
The eighth now paid $9 instead of $12 (25% savings).
The ninth now paid $14 instead of $18 (22% savings).
The tenth now paid $49 instead of $59 (16% savings).

Each of the six was better off than before. And the first four continued to drink for free. But once outside the restaurant, the men began to compare their savings.

"I only got a dollar out of the $20," declared the sixth man. He pointed to the tenth man," but he got $10!"

"Yeah, that's right," exclaimed the fifth man. "I only saved a dollar, too. It's unfair that he got ten times more than I!"

"That's true!!" shouted the seventh man. "Why should he get $10 back when I got only two? The wealthy get all the breaks!"

"Wait a minute," yelled the first four men in unison. "We didn't get anything at all. The system exploits the poor!"

The nine men surrounded the tenth and beat him up.

The next night the tenth man didn't show up for drinks, so the nine sat down and had beers without him. But when it came time to pay the bill, they discovered something important. They didn't have enough money between all of them for even half of the bill!

And that, ladies and gentlemen, journalists and college professors, is how our tax system works. The people who pay the highest taxes get the most benefit from a tax reduction. Tax them too much, attack them for being wealthy, and they just may not show up anymore. In fact, they might start drinking overseas where the atmosphere is somewhat friendlier.
502 posted on 01/31/2008 11:44:02 AM PST by Eagle of Liberty (Ownership, Individuality, Freedom, Responsibility - The Backbone of Conservatism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 485 | View Replies]

To: counterpunch

503 posted on 01/31/2008 11:44:56 AM PST by counterpunch (McCain/Kennedy '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 501 | View Replies]

To: MarkLevinFan

Because I don’t know any other talk-radio person to be this direct. I admire Mark for taking a stand:)


504 posted on 01/31/2008 11:44:57 AM PST by SE Mom (Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 497 | View Replies]

To: Dr.Deth

I thought I heard “anal”, too—just couldn’t believe Rush would say that on the air.


505 posted on 01/31/2008 11:45:51 AM PST by rightwingintelligentsia (Bi-partisanship: Democrats and RINOs working together to screw up the country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 500 | View Replies]

To: counterpunch
I’ve read McCain VP contenders were

Tim Pawlenty of MN - convention in MN and its a purple state

Jim DeMint of SC - to give McCain cover for his amnesty plan

Lindesy Graham - personal puppet

Fred Thompson - old time friend

506 posted on 01/31/2008 11:45:54 AM PST by Republican Red (The word "courage" is not in the liberal vocabulary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 499 | View Replies]

To: Kerretarded

I’ve heard this before, Kerr, and it’s superb. Thanks for posting it—I’ve been meaning to look it up and send it to my nephew.


507 posted on 01/31/2008 11:46:17 AM PST by American Quilter (The urge to save humanity is nearly always a cover for the urge to rule. - H. L. Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 502 | View Replies]

To: SE Mom

So do I!


508 posted on 01/31/2008 11:46:24 AM PST by MarkLevinFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 504 | View Replies]

To: Kerretarded

I like that. Thank you.


509 posted on 01/31/2008 11:47:36 AM PST by Roccus (Nose-holder voter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 502 | View Replies]

To: AGreatPer
You’ve played Congressional and Oakmont?

Talk about impressive!

510 posted on 01/31/2008 11:49:40 AM PST by Clint N. Suhks (©®™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 496 | View Replies]

To: Roccus; American Quilter
Welcome! Easy enough for even a liberal to understand.


511 posted on 01/31/2008 11:51:05 AM PST by Eagle of Liberty (Ownership, Individuality, Freedom, Responsibility - The Backbone of Conservatism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 509 | View Replies]

To: Clint N. Suhks

Roody Doody has interior motives..... LOL!


512 posted on 01/31/2008 11:51:07 AM PST by A. Morgan (VOTE McCain n' WE'LL BE UP TO OUR NECKS IN ILLEGALS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 491 | View Replies]

To: Clint N. Suhks

The only reason I have had the opportunity to play most of the great courses is because I worked for the Japanese. They don’t care about the $$$. I could never afford it on my own.


513 posted on 01/31/2008 11:51:41 AM PST by AGreatPer ("The Democrats don't give a rats ass about this country"....Rush Limbaugh, 11/15/07)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 510 | View Replies]

To: Kerretarded

Sean read that on the air this week.


514 posted on 01/31/2008 11:52:00 AM PST by Clint N. Suhks (©®™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 502 | View Replies]

To: rightwingintelligentsia
“Lindsay Graham is close enough to him [McCain} to die of [????] poisoning”????


515 posted on 01/31/2008 11:53:20 AM PST by Sensei Ern (http://www.myspace.com/reconcomedy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 498 | View Replies]

To: Clint N. Suhks

“Sean read that on the air this week.”
__________________________________________________________

The I can honestly say that I’m sorry I missed one of Sean’s shows.

};^)


516 posted on 01/31/2008 11:53:45 AM PST by Roccus (Nose-holder voter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 514 | View Replies]

To: Clint N. Suhks; Kerretarded

Glenn Beck has been using that analogy for a while.


517 posted on 01/31/2008 11:53:52 AM PST by rightwingintelligentsia (Bi-partisanship: Democrats and RINOs working together to screw up the country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 514 | View Replies]

To: Roccus

The s/b Then


518 posted on 01/31/2008 11:55:22 AM PST by Roccus (Nose-holder voter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 516 | View Replies]

To: rightwingintelligentsia

Maybe he said “renal.” Joined at the hip...


519 posted on 01/31/2008 11:55:46 AM PST by Fudd Fan (sMITTen!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 505 | View Replies]

To: Sensei Ern

Shouldn’t that be -B?


520 posted on 01/31/2008 11:56:03 AM PST by rightwingintelligentsia (Bi-partisanship: Democrats and RINOs working together to screw up the country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 515 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 461-480481-500501-520521-535 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson