Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rally for Romney: Conservatives need to act now, before it is too late.
National Review Online ^ | January 31, 2008 | Mark R. Levin

Posted on 01/31/2008 10:37:41 AM PST by Delacon

I have spent nearly four decades in the conservative movement — from precinct worker to the Reagan White House. I campaigned for Reagan in 1976 and 1980. I served in several top positions during the Reagan administration, including chief of staff to Attorney General Edwin Meese. I have been an active conservative when conservatism was not in high favor.

I remember in 1976, as a 19-year-old in Pennsylvania working the polls for Reagan against the sitting Republican president, Gerald Ford, I was demeaned for supporting a candidate who was said to be an extremist B-actor who couldn’t win a general election, and opposing a sitting president. And at the time Reagan wasn’t even on the ballot in Pennsylvania because he decided to focus his limited resources on other states. I tried to convince voter after voter to write-in Reagan’s name on the ballot. In the end, Reagan received about five percent of the Republican vote as a write-in candidate.

Of course, Reagan lost the nomination to Ford by the narrowest of margins. Ford went on to lose to a little-known ex-governor from Georgia, Jimmy Carter. But the Reagan Revolution became stronger, not weaker, as a result. And the rest is history.

I don’t pretend to speak for President Reagan or all conservatives. I speak for myself. But I watched the Republican debate last night, which was held at the Reagan library, and I have to say that I fear a McCain candidacy. He would be an exceedingly poor choice as the Republican nominee for president.

Let’s get the largely unspoken part of this out the way first. McCain is an intemperate, stubborn individual, much like Hillary Clinton. These are not good qualities to have in a president. As I watched him last night, I could see his personal contempt for Mitt Romney roiling under the surface. And why? Because Romney ran campaign ads that challenged McCain’s record? Is this the first campaign in which an opponent has run ads questioning another candidate’s record? That’s par for the course. To the best of my knowledge, Romney’s ads have not been personal. He has not even mentioned the Keating-Five to counter McCain's cheap shots. But the same cannot be said of McCain’s comments about Romney.

Last night McCain, who is the putative frontrunner, resorted to a barrage of personal assaults on Romney that reflect more on the man making them than the target of the attacks. McCain now has a habit of describing Romney as a “manager for profit” and someone who has “laid-off” people, implying that Romney is both unpatriotic and uncaring. Moreover, he complains that Romney is using his “millions” or “fortune” to underwrite his campaign. This is a crass appeal to class warfare. McCain is extremely wealthy through marriage. Romney has never denigrated McCain for his wealth or the manner in which he acquired it. Evidently Romney’s character doesn’t let him to cross certain boundaries of decorum and decency, but McCain’s does. And what of managing for profit? When did free enterprise become evil? This is liberal pablum which, once again, could have been uttered by Hillary Clinton.

And there is the open secret of McCain losing control of his temper and behaving in a highly inappropriate fashion with prominent Republicans, including Thad Cochran, John Cornyn, Strom Thurmond, Donald Rumsfeld, Bradley Smith, and a list of others. Does anyone honestly believe that the Clintons or the Democrat party would give McCain a pass on this kind of behavior?


As for McCain “the straight-talker,” how can anyone explain his abrupt about-face on two of his signature issues: immigration and tax cuts? As everyone knows, McCain led the battle not once but twice against the border-security-first approach to illegal immigration as co-author of the McCain-Kennedy bill. He disparaged the motives of the millions of people who objected to his legislation. He fought all amendments that would limit the general amnesty provisions of the bill. This controversy raged for weeks. Only now he says he’s gotten the message. Yet, when asked last night if he would sign the McCain-Kennedy bill as president, he dissembles, arguing that it’s a hypothetical question. Last Sunday on Meet the Press, he said he would sign the bill. There’s nothing straight about this talk. Now, I understand that politicians tap dance during the course of a campaign, but this was a defining moment for McCain. And another defining moment was his very public opposition to the Bush tax cuts in 2001 and 2003. He was the media’s favorite Republican in opposition to Bush. At the time his primary reason for opposing the cuts was because they favored the rich (and, by the way, they did not). Now he says he opposed them because they weren’t accompanied by spending cuts. That’s simply not correct.


Even worse than denying his own record, McCain is flatly lying about Romney’s position on Iraq. As has been discussed for nearly a week now, Romney did not support a specific date to withdraw our forces from Iraq. The evidence is irrefutable. And it’s also irrefutable that McCain is abusing the English language (Romney’s statements) the way Bill Clinton did in front of a grand jury. The problem is that once called on it by everyone from the New York Times to me, he obstinately refuses to admit the truth. So, last night, he lied about it again. This isn’t open to interpretation. But it does give us a window into who he is.


Of course, it’s one thing to overlook one or two issues where a candidate seeking the Republican nomination as a conservative might depart from conservative orthodoxy. But in McCain’s case, adherence is the exception to the rule — McCain-Feingold (restrictions on political speech), McCain-Kennedy (amnesty for illegal aliens), McCain-Kennedy-Edwards (trial lawyers’ bill of rights), McCain-Lieberman (global warming legislation), Gang of 14 (obstructing change to the filibuster rule for judicial nominations), the Bush tax cuts, and so forth. This is a record any liberal Democrat would proudly run on. Are we to overlook this record when selecting a Republican nominee to carry our message in the general election?


But what about his national security record? It’s a mixed bag. McCain is rightly credited with being an early voice for changing tactics in Iraq. He was a vocal supporter of the surge, even when many were not. But he does not have a record of being a vocal advocate for defense spending when Bill Clinton was slashing it. And he has been on the wrong side of the debate on homeland security. He supports closing Guantanamo Bay, which would result in granting an array of constitutional protections to al-Qaeda detainees, and limiting legitimate interrogation techniques that have, in fact, saved American lives. Combined with his (past) de-emphasis on border-security, I think it’s fair to say that McCain’s positions are more in line with the ACLU than most conservatives.


Why recite this record? Well, if conservatives don’t act now to stop McCain, he will become the Republican nominee and he will lose the general election. He is simply flawed on too many levels. He is a Republican Hillary Clinton in many ways. Many McCain supporters insist he is the only Republican who can beat Hillary Clinton or Barak Obama. And they point to certain polls. The polls are meaningless this far from November. Six months ago, the polls had Rudy winning the Republican nomination. In October 1980, the polls had Jimmy Carter defeating Ronald Reagan. This is no more than spin.

But wouldn’t the prospect of a Clinton or Obama presidency drive enough of the grassroots to the polls for McCain? It wasn’t enough to motivate the base to vote in November 2006 to stop Nancy Pelosi from becoming speaker or the Democrats from taking Congress. My sense is it won’t be enough to carry McCain to victory, either. And McCain has done more to build animus among the people whose votes he will need than Denny Hastert or Bill Frist. And there won’t be enough Democrats voting for McCain to offset the electorate McCain has alienated (and is likely to continue to alienate, as best as I can tell).

McCain has not won overwhelming pluralities, let alone majorities, in any of the primaries. A thirty-six-percent win in Florida doesn’t make a juggernaut. But the liberal media are promoting him now as the presumptive nominee. More and more establishment Republican officials are jumping on McCain’s bandwagon — the latest being Arnold Schwarzenegger, who has all but destroyed California’s Republican party.

Let’s face it, none of the candidates are perfect. They never are. But McCain is the least perfect of the viable candidates. The only one left standing who can honestly be said to share most of our conservative principles is Mitt Romney. I say this as someone who has not been an active Romney supporter. If conservatives don’t unite behind Romney at this stage, and become vocal in their support for him, then they will get McCain as their Republican nominee and probably a Democrat president. And in either case, we will have a deeply flawed president.

Mark Levin, a former senior Reagan Justice Department official, is a nationally syndicated radio-talk-show host.

TOPICS: Editorial; Politics/Elections; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS: 2008; elections; hillarylite; marklevin; mccain; primaries; romney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 521-526 next last
To: icwhatudo

I guess someone forgot who writes the paycheck for these people. It ain’t conservatives, it’s Clear Channel and Mitt Romney is its silent partner.

Do you really believe he is silent in a Company he created and founded? Sheesh!

I can’t believe Rush could be bought, but it appears to be so. Maybe it’s extortion.....drug charges anyone?

141 posted on 01/31/2008 11:40:14 AM PST by colorcountry (To anger a conservative, lie to him. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Delacon

After 4 years of liberal rule by McCain Hillary or Obama, Mitt will be the Republican nominee and will win as did Reagan, who lost the nomination twice before winning in 1980. 2012.

142 posted on 01/31/2008 11:40:25 AM PST by enough_idiocy (Romney/Thompson or Steele '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mister Politics

Yes really. McCain isn’t getting my vote, and anyone who is a real conservative. He’ll implode just like Dukkakis.

143 posted on 01/31/2008 11:40:29 AM PST by Shadow44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: meandog

Tancredo endorsed him, so obviously he didn’t turn the stomachs of all our candidates.

144 posted on 01/31/2008 11:40:29 AM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: BoBToMatoE; holdonnow

“I think the bottom line is that these guys hate McCain with a passion - not that its hard to do - but they are blindly following someone who is the GOP’s John Kerry.”

So what is your alternative to McCain other than Romney? It’s not about ‘following’ anyone, it’s about NOT getting McCain. It’s that simple.

145 posted on 01/31/2008 11:40:50 AM PST by AuntB (" DON'T LET THE PRESS PICK YOUR CANDIDATE!" Mrs. Duncan Hunter 1/5/08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

assuming that is a given, one has the potential to blow his top in a fit of anger, while having access to the “nukular” codes, and one is sane.

146 posted on 01/31/2008 11:40:53 AM PST by xsmommy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

I don’t know about all the rest of you, but I have on my DAILY prayer list that 2 elder supreme court justices either retire or die in the next 6-9 months (I do name them in my prayers -Ginsberg, Stevens, Breyer- all whom are 80+ in age), giving THIS president a chance to add 1-2 more conservatives to the bench. PRay with me in this matter. We may not have much to say come 2009, but we can sure be lifting our voices upward now...

147 posted on 01/31/2008 11:40:56 AM PST by princess leah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

The cry babies are loud and some come from other sites... so don’t let them fool you.

148 posted on 01/31/2008 11:40:59 AM PST by JFC (I am now a MITTEN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: elizabetty
Romney was very well liked and has been endorsed by the pro-life, pro-family, no tax, pro-gun people who spend their lives working in Massachusetts.

No doubt, he fooled a lot of people in MA, many of whom, having been burned, are now trying to warn the rest of us.

Ignore them at your peril.
149 posted on 01/31/2008 11:41:06 AM PST by Antoninus ("Make all the promises you have to." --Flip Romney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: AuntB
So what is your alternative to McCain other than Romney? It’s not about ‘following’ anyone, it’s about NOT getting McCain. It’s that simple

exactly, auntB, it is an either/or proposition at this point, unfortunately. that is the REALITY.

150 posted on 01/31/2008 11:42:08 AM PST by xsmommy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

If Romney had a “D”, he wouldn’t be a candidate, because his platform wouldn’t get him a place on the ballot in the democratic primary.

McCain has a democrat with an “8” ACU rating campaigning for him, and earns the endorsement of Arnold Shwarzennegger.

151 posted on 01/31/2008 11:42:36 AM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: HOYA97; LucyJo; Jrabbit; Brofholdonow; advance_copy; Liberty Valance; babaloo; MagUSNRET; ...


152 posted on 01/31/2008 11:42:47 AM PST by Fudd Fan (sMITTen!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

You really think that Fred Thompson and Duncan Hunter failed to connect with voters because Hugh Hewitt supported Mitt Romney?

153 posted on 01/31/2008 11:43:35 AM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Delacon

154 posted on 01/31/2008 11:43:57 AM PST by Redcloak ("A plague o' both your houses!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

Compared to the governor they have now, I’ll bet a majority in Mass wish they could get Romney back.

He’s far from perfect, but better than McCain.

155 posted on 01/31/2008 11:44:01 AM PST by dashing doofus (Those who are too smart to engage in politics are punished by being governed by those who are dumber)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: Mister Politics

Polls mean NOTHING in February of 08. Start concerning yourself with them in around October. I’m surprised with a tagline of “Mister Politics” that you don’t know that they mean NOTHING today.

156 posted on 01/31/2008 11:44:35 AM PST by Minn. 4 Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: americanophile; DoughtyOne

If being against a RINO representing Conservatism, makes him wrong...then I’m wrong, too. Apparently, there are lots of “wrong” ones, right here on FR, as well.

And happily so.

157 posted on 01/31/2008 11:44:41 AM PST by papasmurf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: 2harddrive

Romney is a conservative. He signed a bill pushed by the pro-gun lobby which eased restrictions on gun owners AND removed some weapons from an existing Assault Weapons ban. So in fact he did NOT ban any new weapons, repealled a ban on SOME weapons, and helped gun owners.

158 posted on 01/31/2008 11:44:45 AM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

where are the ads showing tim russert etal calling mccain a liar? Mitt needs a few good surrogates to hit mccain below the belt,front and back.
I sent Mitt money on Tuesday.

159 posted on 01/31/2008 11:45:51 AM PST by libbylu (Mitten I WILL NEVER VOTE FOR MCCAIN OR HUCK..THEY CALLED ME RACIST/BIGOT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

But if he was a democrat he’d be telling by party affiliation that he didn’t stand with us.

He’s a solid conservative platform running as a republican. Nobody else running has that.

160 posted on 01/31/2008 11:46:04 AM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 521-526 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson