Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rally for Romney: Conservatives need to act now, before it is too late.
National Review Online ^ | January 31, 2008 | Mark R. Levin

Posted on 01/31/2008 10:37:41 AM PST by Delacon

I have spent nearly four decades in the conservative movement — from precinct worker to the Reagan White House. I campaigned for Reagan in 1976 and 1980. I served in several top positions during the Reagan administration, including chief of staff to Attorney General Edwin Meese. I have been an active conservative when conservatism was not in high favor.

I remember in 1976, as a 19-year-old in Pennsylvania working the polls for Reagan against the sitting Republican president, Gerald Ford, I was demeaned for supporting a candidate who was said to be an extremist B-actor who couldn’t win a general election, and opposing a sitting president. And at the time Reagan wasn’t even on the ballot in Pennsylvania because he decided to focus his limited resources on other states. I tried to convince voter after voter to write-in Reagan’s name on the ballot. In the end, Reagan received about five percent of the Republican vote as a write-in candidate.

Of course, Reagan lost the nomination to Ford by the narrowest of margins. Ford went on to lose to a little-known ex-governor from Georgia, Jimmy Carter. But the Reagan Revolution became stronger, not weaker, as a result. And the rest is history.

I don’t pretend to speak for President Reagan or all conservatives. I speak for myself. But I watched the Republican debate last night, which was held at the Reagan library, and I have to say that I fear a McCain candidacy. He would be an exceedingly poor choice as the Republican nominee for president.

Let’s get the largely unspoken part of this out the way first. McCain is an intemperate, stubborn individual, much like Hillary Clinton. These are not good qualities to have in a president. As I watched him last night, I could see his personal contempt for Mitt Romney roiling under the surface. And why? Because Romney ran campaign ads that challenged McCain’s record? Is this the first campaign in which an opponent has run ads questioning another candidate’s record? That’s par for the course. To the best of my knowledge, Romney’s ads have not been personal. He has not even mentioned the Keating-Five to counter McCain's cheap shots. But the same cannot be said of McCain’s comments about Romney.

Last night McCain, who is the putative frontrunner, resorted to a barrage of personal assaults on Romney that reflect more on the man making them than the target of the attacks. McCain now has a habit of describing Romney as a “manager for profit” and someone who has “laid-off” people, implying that Romney is both unpatriotic and uncaring. Moreover, he complains that Romney is using his “millions” or “fortune” to underwrite his campaign. This is a crass appeal to class warfare. McCain is extremely wealthy through marriage. Romney has never denigrated McCain for his wealth or the manner in which he acquired it. Evidently Romney’s character doesn’t let him to cross certain boundaries of decorum and decency, but McCain’s does. And what of managing for profit? When did free enterprise become evil? This is liberal pablum which, once again, could have been uttered by Hillary Clinton.

And there is the open secret of McCain losing control of his temper and behaving in a highly inappropriate fashion with prominent Republicans, including Thad Cochran, John Cornyn, Strom Thurmond, Donald Rumsfeld, Bradley Smith, and a list of others. Does anyone honestly believe that the Clintons or the Democrat party would give McCain a pass on this kind of behavior?


As for McCain “the straight-talker,” how can anyone explain his abrupt about-face on two of his signature issues: immigration and tax cuts? As everyone knows, McCain led the battle not once but twice against the border-security-first approach to illegal immigration as co-author of the McCain-Kennedy bill. He disparaged the motives of the millions of people who objected to his legislation. He fought all amendments that would limit the general amnesty provisions of the bill. This controversy raged for weeks. Only now he says he’s gotten the message. Yet, when asked last night if he would sign the McCain-Kennedy bill as president, he dissembles, arguing that it’s a hypothetical question. Last Sunday on Meet the Press, he said he would sign the bill. There’s nothing straight about this talk. Now, I understand that politicians tap dance during the course of a campaign, but this was a defining moment for McCain. And another defining moment was his very public opposition to the Bush tax cuts in 2001 and 2003. He was the media’s favorite Republican in opposition to Bush. At the time his primary reason for opposing the cuts was because they favored the rich (and, by the way, they did not). Now he says he opposed them because they weren’t accompanied by spending cuts. That’s simply not correct.


Even worse than denying his own record, McCain is flatly lying about Romney’s position on Iraq. As has been discussed for nearly a week now, Romney did not support a specific date to withdraw our forces from Iraq. The evidence is irrefutable. And it’s also irrefutable that McCain is abusing the English language (Romney’s statements) the way Bill Clinton did in front of a grand jury. The problem is that once called on it by everyone from the New York Times to me, he obstinately refuses to admit the truth. So, last night, he lied about it again. This isn’t open to interpretation. But it does give us a window into who he is.


Of course, it’s one thing to overlook one or two issues where a candidate seeking the Republican nomination as a conservative might depart from conservative orthodoxy. But in McCain’s case, adherence is the exception to the rule — McCain-Feingold (restrictions on political speech), McCain-Kennedy (amnesty for illegal aliens), McCain-Kennedy-Edwards (trial lawyers’ bill of rights), McCain-Lieberman (global warming legislation), Gang of 14 (obstructing change to the filibuster rule for judicial nominations), the Bush tax cuts, and so forth. This is a record any liberal Democrat would proudly run on. Are we to overlook this record when selecting a Republican nominee to carry our message in the general election?


But what about his national security record? It’s a mixed bag. McCain is rightly credited with being an early voice for changing tactics in Iraq. He was a vocal supporter of the surge, even when many were not. But he does not have a record of being a vocal advocate for defense spending when Bill Clinton was slashing it. And he has been on the wrong side of the debate on homeland security. He supports closing Guantanamo Bay, which would result in granting an array of constitutional protections to al-Qaeda detainees, and limiting legitimate interrogation techniques that have, in fact, saved American lives. Combined with his (past) de-emphasis on border-security, I think it’s fair to say that McCain’s positions are more in line with the ACLU than most conservatives.


Why recite this record? Well, if conservatives don’t act now to stop McCain, he will become the Republican nominee and he will lose the general election. He is simply flawed on too many levels. He is a Republican Hillary Clinton in many ways. Many McCain supporters insist he is the only Republican who can beat Hillary Clinton or Barak Obama. And they point to certain polls. The polls are meaningless this far from November. Six months ago, the polls had Rudy winning the Republican nomination. In October 1980, the polls had Jimmy Carter defeating Ronald Reagan. This is no more than spin.

But wouldn’t the prospect of a Clinton or Obama presidency drive enough of the grassroots to the polls for McCain? It wasn’t enough to motivate the base to vote in November 2006 to stop Nancy Pelosi from becoming speaker or the Democrats from taking Congress. My sense is it won’t be enough to carry McCain to victory, either. And McCain has done more to build animus among the people whose votes he will need than Denny Hastert or Bill Frist. And there won’t be enough Democrats voting for McCain to offset the electorate McCain has alienated (and is likely to continue to alienate, as best as I can tell).

McCain has not won overwhelming pluralities, let alone majorities, in any of the primaries. A thirty-six-percent win in Florida doesn’t make a juggernaut. But the liberal media are promoting him now as the presumptive nominee. More and more establishment Republican officials are jumping on McCain’s bandwagon — the latest being Arnold Schwarzenegger, who has all but destroyed California’s Republican party.

Let’s face it, none of the candidates are perfect. They never are. But McCain is the least perfect of the viable candidates. The only one left standing who can honestly be said to share most of our conservative principles is Mitt Romney. I say this as someone who has not been an active Romney supporter. If conservatives don’t unite behind Romney at this stage, and become vocal in their support for him, then they will get McCain as their Republican nominee and probably a Democrat president. And in either case, we will have a deeply flawed president.

Mark Levin, a former senior Reagan Justice Department official, is a nationally syndicated radio-talk-show host.

TOPICS: Editorial; Politics/Elections; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS: 2008; elections; hillarylite; marklevin; mccain; primaries; romney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 521-526 next last
To: redgirlinabluestate
Those who cannot see the difference between Mitt and McCain

Who would that be? I can see the difference, just as I can see the difference between hemlock and cyanide. so at our country's peril.

Either way lies our country's peril.

41 posted on 01/31/2008 10:57:43 AM PST by Petronski (People get the kind of government they deserve.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Hattie

Me too. He needs the help..

42 posted on 01/31/2008 10:57:50 AM PST by Goreknowshowtocheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Delacon

It would be a little more believable if they were turning to Romney as the only remaining hope after the real conservatives were driven from the race.

Unfortunately, however, it was National Review and Hugh Hewitt and a few others who sold their heritage for a mess of pottage and bought the Romney “electability” myth to begin with.

Now we’re down to two losers, largely because of their stupidity, and they want us to hop on board the Romney express.

I would agree that Romney is the lesser of two evils. But whose fault is it that we are in this mess? National Review, Hugh Hewitt, and a few others, including some of the Evangelical leaders who got into a snit about Fred, even though he is the closest of all the conservative candidates to their own positions. Huckabee? Don’t make me laugh.

43 posted on 01/31/2008 10:58:01 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

People seem to be forgetting that Romney was gov of Massacommunists! Of course he has some liberal stains on his record! Not possible for him to govern that cesspool of socialism without giving ground on some leftwing cr@p! Sheesh.

McCain, on the other hand, is FAR more flawed with NO excuse or reason.

Sheesh again.

44 posted on 01/31/2008 10:58:07 AM PST by piytar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Delacon

Since when is Romney a conservative? Wasn’t he the Governor of Mass? Didn’t he sign an “assault weapons” ban?

45 posted on 01/31/2008 10:58:41 AM PST by 2harddrive (...House a TOTAL Loss.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
Thats OK. I will take Mark Levin’s version of the events over the hogwash from the msm that you have been posting.
46 posted on 01/31/2008 10:58:43 AM PST by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Delacon

Thank u Mark!!!

47 posted on 01/31/2008 10:58:58 AM PST by JFC (I am now a MITTEN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Parley Baer
I will take Mark Levin’s version of the events...

Just don't pretend you were ever going to do anything else.

48 posted on 01/31/2008 10:59:33 AM PST by Petronski (People get the kind of government they deserve.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

Maybe everyone but you isn’t wrong.

49 posted on 01/31/2008 10:59:37 AM PST by americanophile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: icwhatudo

That’s funny. I know you don’t think in these terms, but you could mirror that and change the names IMO.

Good one.

50 posted on 01/31/2008 10:59:39 AM PST by DoughtyOne (PARTY WANTED: Full Time, Cons exp a must. Refs 20 yrs. No Amnesty sptrs. 1 vote per 4 yrs negotiable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: americanophile

Romney’s record is there for anyone willing to look.

I guarantee you if he was running with a (D) after his name you would see his past clearly and fight like hell to keep him out of office.

51 posted on 01/31/2008 11:01:22 AM PST by DoughtyOne (PARTY WANTED: Full Time, Cons exp a must. Refs 20 yrs. No Amnesty sptrs. 1 vote per 4 yrs negotiable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: redgirlinabluestate

Thanks Mark for the wake up call. I’m making a donation to Mitt Romney right now. He wasn’t my first choice, but it looks like he will be my last. I can’t bring myself to back McCain.
There is too much water under the bridge for the conservative wing of the party to support him.

Go Mitt!!!!!!

52 posted on 01/31/2008 11:01:25 AM PST by Millie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: meandog
Please pray for future President McCain--day minus 335 and counting! Vote Mitt=Get Billary!)

Better pray for our Country, if the best we can do is McCain.

On that note FreeRepublic has officially became irrelevant. We can now stand by and watch the MSM frenzy along with the collusion of the GOP leadership, as our country slowly ceases to exist, as a free Republic.

53 posted on 01/31/2008 11:01:36 AM PST by itsahoot (Gingrich: "We don't have a peace process. We have a surrender process." (Duncan Hunter gets it.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Goreknowshowtocheat

We all MUST Send Romney $$$$$ asap!

54 posted on 01/31/2008 11:01:47 AM PST by JFC (I am now a MITTEN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: gunservative

Well, it’s going to be a long process, and when Hillary Clinton appoints 2 leftist, pro-abortion judges to the Supreme Court, you can expect to wait 25 years to undue it.

55 posted on 01/31/2008 11:02:13 AM PST by americanophile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: piytar
People seem to be forgetting that Romney was gov of Massacommunists!

Funny, that same "excuse" doesn't work for Huckabee, does it? MA had Republican governors back into the 1990s, and yet they did NOTHING to advance conservatism in that state. Indeed, Mitt did such a "good" job that there were 30,000 fewer registered Republicans in the state when he left office--and coincidentally, 30,000 more democrats.

If you want that same performance on a national level, support Flip.
56 posted on 01/31/2008 11:02:16 AM PST by Antoninus ("Make all the promises you have to." --Flip Romney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Delacon

Yes!....A vote for Mitt is the only thing we have friends!

57 posted on 01/31/2008 11:02:41 AM PST by AngelesCrestHighway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
Neither one of those pathetic liberals was ever getting my vote.

I always respect your opinion, even if I don't always agree with it.

Who do you intend to vote for in November, if you do so at all? I'm trying to determine if there is a movement here towards a candidate, as it seems most FReepers are posting in opposition towards those already in the race.

58 posted on 01/31/2008 11:03:38 AM PST by TonyInOhio (Looks like I need to brush up on my Spanish.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus; DoughtyOne; JRochelle; Petronski; Cicero
Glad to see I'm not alone. Very disheartening times. I had just come to terms with the fact that Nat'l Review now stands for nothing after they suddenly began painting Romney as a conservative. I can sort of write them off as "the establishment," but when the grassroots-oriented talkies begin down this disingenuous, Orwellian route where Romney is a suddenly conservative... absolutely speechless. As Antoninus said, if we're down to Romney it's way too late. Pinning the hopes of conservatism on a liberal like Romney? That's a nonsensical option.

The discussion within the movement ought to be about post-2008 politics and where we ought to go. Because no matter which party wins the Presidency, conservatism has lost a major battle. And sadly, many intellectual and grassroots leaders are damaging themselves with this odd shilling for Romney.

59 posted on 01/31/2008 11:03:55 AM PST by manapua
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: nj patriot
In the real world in which we live, we rarely get everything we want. Romney, not my first choice, seems to be the leader I can rally behind. I will do so rather than go home crying.

Romney is every bit as bad as Christie Whittman. And we're still crying over her here in NJ, aren't we? Especially now that her brand of Republicanism rules the shell of the Republican party she left behind.

If you want that kind of experience on a national level, support Mitt.
60 posted on 01/31/2008 11:04:10 AM PST by Antoninus ("Make all the promises you have to." --Flip Romney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 521-526 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson