Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama Republicans?
Townhall.com ^ | February 3, 2008 | Salena Zito

Posted on 02/03/2008 5:13:20 AM PST by Kaslin

ST. LOUIS - Barack Obama speaks in a clear style that almost always leaves his audience with a sense that he stands for something – which explains those comparisons with the last “Great Communicator,” Ronald Reagan.

Some of the comparisons have been used in opposition research against Obama, though largely in vain. Nothing detrimental stuck because Reagan successfully bridged the divide between Republicans and Democrats by building a remarkable coalition known as Reagan Democrats.

If one great communicator -- the eloquent Ronald Reagan -- could build a coalition of disaffected Democrats that swung both of his presidential elections his way, can an almost-great communicator -- the fiery Barack Obama -- build a coalition of disaffected Republicans to swing the Democrat primary election his way?

It's possible, says Brian F. Schaffner, an assistant professor of political science at American University in Washington, D.C. "Obama definitely has the potential to win over some Republicans in the same way that Reagan won over some Democrats,” says Brian F. Schaffner, an assistant professor of political science at American University in Washington, D.C.

Even though Obama probably takes more liberal positions on many issues than does Hillary Clinton, Schaffner says the perception among Republicans is that he is more moderate.

“This is a matter of style over substance,” Schaffner notes. “Obama speaks so often of bringing the parties together and working with Republicans, he seems less polarizing to Republicans than Clinton, who has long been demonized by that party.”

The Pew Research Center corroborates Schaffner's inkling. It recently produced a report showing that Obama is perceived as more liberal than Clinton among Democrats, yet is seen as more moderate than Clinton among Republicans.

One Republican who isn't afraid of Obama's liberalism is John Martin, who directs the grassroots Web organization “Republicans for Obama.”

A Bronx, N.Y., native who was very active in the Young Republicans in college, Martin, 29, is in law school but serving on active duty in Afghanistan as a U.S. Navy reservist. E-mailing from Afghanistan, Martin said his group has more than 400 members since he last checked and that the Web site’s server received so many clicks the day Obama won Iowa that it crashed.

Lisa Kinzer, 30, is another rock-ribbed Republican who's gone Obama. The Norman, Okla., native has been a registered Republican for 12 years. She has nothing against President Bush. But she does have a problem with the GOP's 2008 candidates.

Their bickering over the morality of using torture while interrogating terrorist suspects in an early debate was her turning point, she says, so she went to shop on the Democrats' side and picked Obama -- who she believes stands the best chance of uniting the nation of bringing the country back together “of by "reminding us of what we all have in common, our love of this country and our hope for its future.”

Towson University science professor Antonio Campbell is a lifelong Republican -- he even ran as one in Maryland’s 7th Congressional District 10 years ago. Yet if Obama wins the Democrats' nomination, Campbell says he will become an “Obama Republican.”

“Obama’s message reads like Reagan’s playbook -- individual strength, faith and behaving in a fiscally competent way,” Campbell says.

Obama is the only Democrat he would vote for, Campbell adds. His second choice is John McCain.

“The opportunity does seem to be out there for Obama to build an 'Obama Republican' coalition,” says Cal Jillson, political science professor at Southern Methodist University in Dallas.

While Obama clearly will not replicate Reagan’s policies, Jillson says, he might replicate Reagan’s larger theme of America as a land of opportunity. He might even persuade some Republicans “that government can effectively help families meeting their most serious challenges, like steady jobs at good pay, health care and college tuition at affordable prices.

Obama won in the more conservative states of South Carolina and Iowa. Now, heading into Super Tuesday, he is knocking on doors in more-conservative, ruby-red states such as those he's knocking on here in Missouri and Kansas.

His tactics build on Democratic Party Chairman Howard Dean’s 50-state strategy that, coupled with promising candidates, won Democrats the 2006 mid-term election.

“Reagan represented a fundamental shift in politics -- he created a majority coalition, and the voting population changed,” says Jillson, as the primaries head into Super Tuesday.

If Obama can do to Republicans what Reagan did to Democrats, then Obama really will be 2008’s “candidate of change.”


TOPICS: Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-73 last
To: Theo
“Obama has no substance. He’s all just style.”

Yes, just an empty suit, but if McPain is the Republican
candidate, I will not bother to vote.
Either way, we are dead meat.

51 posted on 02/03/2008 6:35:04 AM PST by AlexW (Reporting from Bratislava, Slovakia. Happy not to be back in the USA for now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

There’s a BIG...HUGE...difference here. Reagan won “disaffected democrats” to his side with IDEAS. With Obama, it isn’t ideas, it’s personality and cadenced preaching. And it isn’t “republicans” he’s “winning over”. This is a lie. The “republicans” following Obama are demonRATs in sheep’s clothing. Their single purpose is to vote in our primaries and sabotage our choices. They bleat to the media how “unhappy” they are with the party, how much more they like Obama, Hillary, etc. than their “own” candidates. They work long and hard to defeat us emotionally and intellectually, to make us wonder if we are wrong, to doubt ourselves. And BOY! are they good at it.

I am going to have to concede a point here: these leftists are incredibly good at what they have been doing to us for so long now- wearing us down like water on rock. They have managed to convince too many of us that we are antiquated, have old ideas, it’s time to move forward, blah blah blah...

How many republicans truly believe that we NEED government- to take care of the needy? to educate our kids? to respond to disasters? to manage “public lands” and keep the environment “healthy? to grant money for R&D? to build anything outside an Interstate? to assure our retirement and health? How many republicans believe that certain moral absolutes, like honor, honesty, fairness and faith, are no longer absolute?

Why do we believe it?


52 posted on 02/03/2008 6:36:46 AM PST by 13Sisters76 ("It is amazing how many people mistake a certain hip snideness for sophistication. " Thos. Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: brytlea

Actually, I found some information recently to the effect that a number of retired Americans are moving to select areas in Mexico to live because the dollar buys so much more there.


53 posted on 02/03/2008 6:52:34 AM PST by RipSawyer (Does anyone still believe this is a free country?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: LowCountryJoe
That's not criteria that I concern myself with.

And you are against big government?

Public employee retirement systems are insolvent. Congressmen retire as millionaires.

Keep flooding those illegals in for more public housing.

The check is in the mail. Yeah, right...

54 posted on 02/03/2008 6:57:15 AM PST by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Sir Francis Dashwood
And you are against big government?

In fact, I am. But you can be damned straight that when I volunteered to serve the Marine Corps for ten years, I do so on condition I received a government check for my efforts.

So, I answered your question now answer mine. Are you going to forgo the social security checks when you are eligible; you know, to keep your principled view on this matter?

55 posted on 02/03/2008 7:23:52 AM PST by LowCountryJoe (Do class-warfare and disdain of laissez-faire have their places in today's GOP?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: LowCountryJoe
Are you going to forgo the social security checks when you are eligible; you know, to keep your principled view on this matter?

I want the money returned with interest. I was robbed at gunpoint.

56 posted on 02/03/2008 7:28:55 AM PST by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Drew68
You hit the nail on the head! Your post is worth repeating exactly as is. I don't think this story is entirely BS. I am hearing a lot of, "Despite the fact that I disagree with Obama on everything, I'm really starting to like the guy!" Obama generates warm feelings among Republicans who enjoy watching the Clintons lose their grip on power and then lash out publicly in red-faced anger towards the one person who is standing in their way. Given the disgust so many Republicans are feeling towards their own candidates, some of pleasure in watching Obama giving Hillary her comeuppance might actually carry over to a "maybe he might not be a bad president" attitude. I do feel that if the Democrats are smart enough to nominate Obama, they'll win in a landslide. The Clintons are bound and determined to not let this happen. They would rather destroy their party than lose power." Personally, I'm a Conservative with modest to strong Libertarian leanings. Limited government is the answer. Nevertheless, I relish seeing Obama beating Hillary for the nomination, even though I think he'll beat anyone the Republicans put forward.
57 posted on 02/03/2008 7:46:04 AM PST by ktupper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

If that jerk McCain rolls on Super-Tuesday I cross over in Ohio in March and vote for Obama as my effort to de-rail Hillary.


58 posted on 02/03/2008 7:52:14 AM PST by Buckeye Battle Cry (Life is too short to go through it clenched of sphincter and void of humor - it's okay to laugh.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RipSawyer

Probably so. I think Costa Rica is also having that, and my son lived there for 6 months a couple of years ago and LOVED it. It is apparently pretty safe and they like Americans. He said their govt is patterned on ours (I cannot attest to the truth of that but he’s a double major poly sci/history so I take his word for it).

It’s a thought. It’s a beautiful place.

susie


59 posted on 02/03/2008 7:56:35 AM PST by brytlea (amnesty--an act of clemency by an authority by which pardon is granted esp. to a group of individual)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: LowCountryJoe
IIRC my Father in Law (also a retired Marine, he was a pilot, what a guy he was!) tried to decline his SS but there was something that forced him not to. I can’t remember what it was, but it may have been that he would lose medical coverage, which reverted to Medicare once he hit that age, rather than whatever the military was doing (CHAMPUS?)
You are sort of damned if you do...

BTW there is nothing wrong with some people receiving a govt check, and the military comes to mind. Thanks for your service and God bless you.

susie

60 posted on 02/03/2008 7:59:46 AM PST by brytlea (amnesty--an act of clemency by an authority by which pardon is granted esp. to a group of individual)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: AmericaUnited

Republicans seem to have forgotten how to run ideological campaigns against Democrats for President. Kerry’s hugely liberal record went virtually unchallenged in 2004; Gore’s and Clinton’s somewhat more moderate liberal records were similarly let alone in 2000 and 1992 respectively. Dole couldn’t connect with anything in 1996.

We can presumably beat Clinton this fall on a low-idea-content 2004 or 2000 campaign, because she’s so intensely unpopular and mistrusted, and McCain (whether fairly or not) seems to be well trusted and popular. However, Obama simply cannot be beat on a low-idea-content race. We need to run the way we ran against Dukakis, Mondale, Carter and McGovern focused on the bankruptcy of liberal ideas and the ardent embrace of those bankrupt ideas by the candidate, or we’ll lose.


61 posted on 02/03/2008 8:08:28 AM PST by only1percent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Sir Francis Dashwood
Okay, that’s a great answer. But you do know that it will not be coming back to you to the same degree a private investment, of the same money, would have. More to the point, though, what little you will get back will be in the form of a check from the U.S. Treasury. Are you going to cash that check?
62 posted on 02/03/2008 9:51:37 AM PST by LowCountryJoe (Do class-warfare and disdain of laissez-faire have their places in today's GOP?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: brytlea
I remember CHUMPUS. I don't recall what the acronym stood for. While I was in, the new system that replaced it was called Cry Try Scare Tri Care. All snide names aside, the amount of coverage that my family received amounted to over $800 a month if a premium (plus 2% admin fee) were to have to cover the level of coverage. That was back in 1999 when I looked into extending my then current coverage through COBRA. I opted for private insurance with co-pays.
63 posted on 02/03/2008 9:58:25 AM PST by LowCountryJoe (Do class-warfare and disdain of laissez-faire have their places in today's GOP?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

If “The Obama” wins how much will we have to pay in reparations for slavery?


64 posted on 02/03/2008 10:05:40 AM PST by AEMILIUS PAULUS (It is a shame that when these people give a riot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: brytlea

I hope Costa Rica patterned their government on what ours is SUPPOSED to be and not what it has become and certainly not what it is apt to become after the next election!


65 posted on 02/03/2008 11:38:52 AM PST by RipSawyer (Does anyone still believe this is a free country?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: darkangel82

He is to left of Hillary on every issue.


66 posted on 02/03/2008 1:59:15 PM PST by mthom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: LowCountryJoe
More to the point, though, what little you will get back will be in the form of a check from the U.S. Treasury. Are you going to cash that check?

It is my money to start with and I want it returned in gold.

It is not "income" or a "salary."

All of those jerks running get a welfare check every month from some government entity - EXCEPT Mitt Romney.

Split hairs all you want...

67 posted on 02/03/2008 2:02:02 PM PST by Sir Francis Dashwood (LET'S ROLL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

How stupid do you have to be to consider yourself a Republican and then get conned by that oily scumbag Obama? “Flibberty jib....flibberty jib....flibberty jib....change.... flibberty jib....”


68 posted on 02/03/2008 2:07:09 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RipSawyer

It is a Democratic Republic, altho they appear to have some differences (from what I just read online). But then, as you point out, even WE aren’t patterned on what our founding fathers intended, at least largely.

susie


69 posted on 02/03/2008 2:07:53 PM PST by brytlea (amnesty--an act of clemency by an authority by which pardon is granted esp. to a group of individual)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Semper911
Regarding your tagline, we could have had Reagan in 1976 and suffered no Carter at all. However, the RINO's in the party decided that Jerry Ford was the safer choice.

I often wonder how different our country would have been if Reagan was elected four years earlier (he came within a whisker of getting the nomination in '76). We would have had eight years of Ronald Reagan in his prime, there would have been no Iran hostage crisis (or it would have been shortlived), and we almost certainly never would have had Bush Sr. in the White House.

Those Carter years were terrible, no way do I want to hand this country back to the Clintons in the faint hope that we get another "Reagan" four years from now.

70 posted on 02/03/2008 2:21:25 PM PST by SamAdams76 (I am 6 days away from outliving Nicolette Larson (Mitt is It))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76

Wow, I never thought of that. I do remember hearing Reagan speak in 76, it would have been the first election we could vote in, my new husband and I—we ended up not voting because we had just moved to Denver and couldn’t find the polling place. Anyway, I was wowed by what he had to say in what I think was a paid spot (30 minutes prime time I think—and as a 19 year old I was glued to the set and his every word).

I was so happy when he ran the next time and I stood in line for over an hour, 9 months pregnant with my 3rd child, just to pull the lever for Reagan. But, to have had him 4 years earlier, wow. Thank you for pointing that out.

susie


71 posted on 02/03/2008 3:18:50 PM PST by brytlea (amnesty--an act of clemency by an authority by which pardon is granted esp. to a group of individual)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Republicans for Osama Obama? Only RINOs like the Gropinator.


72 posted on 02/03/2008 3:29:35 PM PST by lilylangtree (Veni, Vidi, Vici)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: potlatch; holdonnow; PhilDragoo; ntnychik; MeekOneGOP; Seadog Bytes; Interesting Times; ...


73 posted on 02/03/2008 4:45:36 PM PST by devolve (---- - Hey Boone! - My bonus check is late again! -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-73 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson