To: Balding_Eagle
WHo is paying for her care? I don't know and it isn't relevant.
17 posted on
02/03/2008 11:05:01 AM PST by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: wagglebee
I don't know and it isn't relevant. It may not be relevant to the moral question, but it is always relevant to how much and what kind of care a person gets.
You and I will never get the same care that the wealthy get. A homeless down and outer will never get as much or the same level of care that this woman already has received.
If these folks didn't make plans for her expensive care, they may not have any say in how much additional care she gets from welfare sources.
Take me, for example, my care in a serious medical situation will be limited by the financial resources I can bring to the table.
I will never have the luxury of getting as much medical care as this woman already has reeived.
Now, tell me that doesn't matter.
38 posted on
02/03/2008 1:40:01 PM PST by
Balding_Eagle
(If America falls, darkness will cover the face of the earth for a thousand years.)
To: wagglebee
Would you, personally, be willing to pay for her perpetual care?
107 posted on
02/04/2008 5:16:20 PM PST by
William Terrell
(Individuals can exist without government but government can't exist without individuals.)
To: wagglebee; William Terrell; Balding_Eagle
"This person suffering from hereditary defects costs the community 60,000 reichsmarks during his lifetime. Fellow German, that is your money too. Read
New People, the monthly magazines of the race-political office of the NSDAP [National Socialist German Workers Party]"
165 posted on
04/19/2008 10:22:06 PM PDT by
Mr. Silverback
(It's not conservative to accept an inept Commander-in-Chief in a time of war. Back Mac.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson