More on a Hillary Comeback

US News ^ | Feb. 19, 2008 | by Michael Barone

[katieanna]

If you live in Texas just remember your voter card does NOT have to be stamped “democrat”. I spoke with a county official this morning. Go ahead a vote Obama!

[jveritas]

Please see my post # 60 on why I believe it is a huge mistake to vote for Hillary Clinton in the Texas primaries.

[jveritas]

Charles,

People are getting it the exit polls wrong an you are telling me about a grand strategy for 2012 as if it is a sure thing. We cannot afford Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama as a President. Think about our troops and the war on terror.

McCain 2008.

[Jeff Head]

I believe it will take the support of crossovers in both states to keep Hillary close enough for the very fight you envision. I want that fight to be ugly...because IMHO it will alienate large segments of the democratic voting block away from Hillary.

[jveritas]

As bad as Clinton was policy-wise, it’s not like the government fell apart with them at the helm.

9/11/2001 is the dirtect result of Bill Clinton idiocy and cowardliness. Enough said.

[jveritas]

I want the fight to be ugly too. However the fight will be ugly if Obama is ahead by 150-200 delegates going to the convention where Hillary Clinton will try to steal it via the Super Delegates and hence destroy the democrat party for decades whether she succeeds or not in getting the nomination. If she wins Texas and Ohio by big margins and close the delegates count with Obama then she will win the nomination without the ugly fight at the convention. Obama must be very close to her in Texas so he can deny her the closing of the delgates gap.

[FUMETTI]

I don’t bet, I look at the facts and tell ‘em as it is. White males, 40% of the electorate, won’t vote for her. Almost 1/2 of this country will not vote for her under any circumstance. I stand by my remarks.

[CharlesWayneCT]

I have no interest in a 2012 strategy. I’m simply saying that even if you DO believe in a 2012 strategy, Hillary is better for that strategy than Obama.

Most people are pushing for Obama because they think he’d be easier to beat in 2012. First, I think he would be a disaster during those 4 years, worse than Hillary, and second, I don’t think he’d be easier to beat in 2012 than Hillary.

I’d much rather win in 2008. Then the 2012 strategy is to get a conservative to replace McCain in 2012 when he steps down.

[bill1952]

White males, 40% of the electorate, won’t vote for her. Almost 1/2 of this country will not vote for her under any circumstance.

White males will vote for her in droves.
Big freaking mobs of them will stampede to the polls to usher in a democrat.

I look at the facts and tell ‘em as it is

Hate to tell you this, but someone has to clue you in:

Those are not facts; those are media opinion polls.

I stand by my remarks.

Just don't put your money where your mouth is.

[FUMETTI]

Polls? LOL!!!

Good one, Bill, polls are such accurate barometers. Didn’t opinion polls say Rudy Giuliani would be the next nominee for the Republicans?

Didn’t opinion polls say Barack Obama would not be a threat?

Didn’t exit polls say Kerry won in 2004?

While I am pummeling you some more with FACTS, here are some sweet polls for YOU.

http://mensnewsdaily.com/2008/02/14/white-men-give-hillary-a-lesson-in-realpolitick/

http://www.townhall.com/columnists/KathrynJeanLopez/2008/02/08/dems_turn_off_male_vote?page=full&comments=true

http://thehill.com/campaign-2008/fifty-percent-of-americans-would-not-vote-for-clinton-2007-03-27.html

Yeah, I am going to bet you. You sound like the welcher type.

I am not here to play the Lotto or the pools, dude. I am here to tell you that you are full of it. I stand by my remarks. Choke on these essays.