Skip to comments.Open Letter: Star Jones Checks Bill O'Reilly's Racist Remark
Posted on 02/27/2008 9:49:41 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
Star Jones Reynolds has never been one to mince words. It's no wonder that when Bill O'Reilly's most recent controversial (see also: racist) comments about Michelle Obama, wife of Democratic frontrunner Barack Obama, were discovered by Media Matters, the TruTV legal analyst was infuriated!
O'Reilly, the curmudgeon host of Fox News Channel's 'The O'Reilly Factor,' was talking to a caller that was angry that Obama had said on C-Span that "for the first time in my adult lifetime, I'm really proud of my country."
The 58-year-old television commentator, who privately settled a sexual harassment lawsuit against him in 2004, responded to the caller by offering that of course they'd have to check the facts first.
He said: "I don't want to go on a lynching party against Michelle Obama unless there's evidence, hard facts, that say this is how the woman really feels. If that's how she really feels - that is a bad country or a flawed nation, whatever - then that's legit. We'll track it down."
"Lynching party? Track it down?"
In the words of Whitney Houston: "Hell to the naw!"
Even better are the prolific words of Reynolds.
With her permission, The BV Buzz is running the current 'Today Show' legal contributor and the former 'The View' host's entire 'Open Letter' about Bill O'Reilly.
"I'm sick to death of people like Fox News host, Bill O'Reilly, and his ilk thinking that he can use a racial slur against a black woman who could be the next First Lady of the United States, give a half-assed apology and not be taken to task and called on his crap.
This week O'Reilly gave the following response to a caller on his radio show who was making unsubstantiated negative charges against presidential candidate Barack Obama's wife, Michelle Obama:
'And I don't want to go on a lynching party against Michelle Obama unless there's evidence, hard facts, that say this is how the woman really feels. If that's how she really feels -- that is a bad country or a flawed nation, whatever -- then that's legit. We'll track it down.'
What the hell? If it's 'legit,' you're going to 'track it down?' And then what do you plan to do?
How dare this white man with a microphone and the trust of the public think that in 2008, he can still put the words 'lynch and party' together in the same sentence with reference to a black woman; in this case, Michelle Obama? I don't care how you 'spin it' in the 'no spin zone,' that statement in and of itself is racist, unacceptable and inappropriate on every level.
O'Reilly claims his comments were taken out of context. Please don't insult my intelligence while you're insulting me. I've read the comments and heard them delivered in O'Reilly's own voice; and there is no right context that exists. So, his insincere apology and "out-of-context" excuse is not going to cut it with me.
And just so we're clear, this has nothing to do with the 2008 presidential election, me being a Democrat, him claiming to be Independent while talking Republican, the liberal media or a conservative point of view. To the contrary, this is about crossing a line in the sand that needs to be drawn based on history, dignity, taste and truth.
Bill, I'm not sure of where you come from, but let me tell you what the phrase 'lynching party' conjures up to me, a black woman born in North Carolina . Those words depict the image of a group of white men who are angry with the state of the own lives getting together, drinking more than they need to drink, lamenting how some black person has moved forward (usually ahead of them in stature or dignity), and had the audacity to think that they are equal. These same men for years, instead of looking at what changes, should and could make in their own lives that might remove that bitterness born of perceived privilege, these white men take all of that resentment and anger and decide to get together and drag the closest black person near them to their death by hanging them from a tree -- usually after violent beating, torturing and violating their human dignity. Check your history books, because you don't need a masters or a law degree from Harvard to know that is what constitutes a 'lynching party.'
Imagine, Michelle and Barack Obama having the audacity to think that they have the right to the American dream, hopes, and ideals. O'Reilly must think to himself: how dare they have the arrogance to think they can stand in a front of this nation, challenge the status quo and express the frustration of millions? When this happens, the first thing that comes to mind for O'Reilly and people like him is: 'it's time for a party.'
Not so fast...don't order the rope just yet.
Would O'Reilly ever in a million years use this phrase with reference to Elizabeth Edwards, Cindy McCain or Judi Nathan? I mean, in all of the statements and criticisms that were made about Judi Nathan, the one-time mistress turned missus, of former presidential candidate Rudy Giuliani, I never heard any talk of forming a lynch party because of something she said or did.
So why is it that when you're referring to someone who's African-American you must dig to a historical place of pain, agony and death to symbolize your feelings? Lynching is not a joke to off-handedly throw around and it is not a metaphor that has a place in political commentary; provocative or otherwise. I admit that I come from a place of personal outrage here having buried my 90 year-old grandfather last year. This proud, amazing African-American man raised his family and lived through the time when he had to use separate water fountains, ride in the back of a bus, take his wife on a date to the 'colored section' of a movie theater, and avert his eyes when a white woman walked down the street for fear of what a white man and his cronies might do if they felt the urge to 'party'; don't tell me that the phrase you chose, Mr. O'Reilly, was taken out of context.
To add insult to injury, O'Reilly tried to 'clarify' his statements, by using the excuse that his comments were reminiscent of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas' use of the term 'high-tech lynching' during his confirmation hearing. I reject that analogy. You see Justice Thomas did mean to bring up the image of lynching in its racist context. He was saying that politics and the media were using a new technology to do to him what had been done to black men for many years -- hang him. Regardless of if you agreed with Justice Thomas' premise or not, if in fact -- Bill O'Reilly was referencing it -- the context becomes even clearer.
What annoys me more than anything is that I get the feeling that one of the reasons Bill O'Reilly made this statement, thinking he could get away with it in the first place, and then followed it up with a lame apology in a half-hearted attempt to smooth any ruffled feathers, is because he doesn't think that black women will come out and go after him when he goes after us. Well, he's dead wrong. Be clear Bill O'Reilly: there will be no lynch party for that black woman. And this black woman assures you that if you come for her, you come for all of us." -- Star Jones Reynolds
Could be a real problem!
what a bunch of pc nutjobs
and people who allow this demagogic crap spouted by jones and her ilk (jackson/sharpton, etc) to appear valid - they are sheeple
i guess if he had said ‘we’re going to burn her on this one’ they would have had him putting her on a cross in the yard
to me jones is a big-time race-baiter and the people who support people like her are ignorant
loudmouths and politicians on the left can make outrageous and provocative statements, and spread lies like the plague without concern, yet find one conservative or Christian that doubts the veracity or intent of a liberal and that conservative better batten down the hatches
I can only hope that there are enough true conservative people in congress to support filibusters for at least 4 years
Z-z-z-z-z. Noose, lynch, hanging around the water cooler.
Check her out now http://www.starjones.com/
As a member of the race of white men who were lynched for rustling cattle, I am deeply offended. Especially when I think of my dear Father who died only seven years ago; and although he never experienced lynching himself, I am sure that he heard about it.
Someone please explain to me how the above statemens by ex-post-fatso Jones are NOT racist? They are far more offensive than BOR's statement in DEFENSE of Ms. Obamanation.
translation: There is no substance to argue so I will call you a racist and thats easy to make stick.
America is lost without its right of free speech and free speech is currently curtailed under the auspices of “hate” crimes legislation and “politically correct” speech.
Walk by a group on many campuses or even in many towns and say “”hello Guys” and several lefties will spit then venom as to how you are sexist.
We will soon not be able to say the words “Black man/woman” in our conversation because we are white.
Were blacks the only to people to ever be lynched?
Blacks are getting to be a lot like the Muzzies in that they live in a constant state of outrage.
BE AMERICAN! PUT AMERICA FIRST!
So, I guess my friend Dan LYNCH won’t be getting another PARTY in his life.
Destroy Clint Eastwood movies, other westerns demand Obama supporters
Lynching scenes excited whites, recruited for KKK, Obama advisor says
You don't remember those old western movies from the 1930s, 1940s, 1950s, 1960s, 1970s including some Clint Eastwood classics? You didn't go to the movies back then? or watch them on TV in the 1960s and 1970s?
I can absolutely say that unless lynching was mentioned in the context of the south my thoughts were of those western movies and "justice" for horse thieves; stealing a man's horse was probably the worst of the crimes.
Does AOL Black Voices include people like Walter Williams, Alan Keyes, and Clarence Thomas among those voices?
If not then it is mislabelled.
Always be skeptical of any scandal that begins with “(George Soros funded) Media Matter reports...”
They have deliberately misquoted Rush Limbaugh countless times and even marked his comments with a preface saying “Media Matters is probably going to get this wrong...”
Maybe but that shows class!
It’ll all be over for Barrack Hussein Obama if the public finds out that the Christian sect he belongs to is Mormon. < /s >
Couldn’t hear enough said about Mitt’s religion in the media. “Will Americans vote for a Mormon for the highest office?” “Does he wear strange underwear?” “Does he really believe...”
American history bad influence, whites seen turning to violence
"'Hanging Judge Roy Bean' should be expunged from history, says Obama team"
"Treatment as a hero excites whites and recruits for KKK," says key Obama adviser.
“Are we on the verge of another civil war or race riots?”
.....yes, but we’re probably about a generation away....race wars of secession and partition are a global reality...why wouldn’t they come here?....
Aren't you being a bit harsh?
YOU RACIST! 8-)
PC police will outlaw common expressions to get attention.
But you are the one who should be offended It was British Loyalists who were Lynched by Rebellious Colonials
What you’re saying is total bs! Basically, every white must carefully pick and chose their words before speaking to a black? Is that what you’re saying? I have to abdicate my vocabulary to please people? This reminds me of years ago when a college student told a bunch of black women to quiet their music, refering to them as buffalo’s. They cried racism because the term refered to Africa or some such nonsense. And the white student was reprimanded.
Do I really want someone with the middle name of Hussein as president?
No Way !
Nope, just realistic.
I am no big fan of OReilly but I hope he fires back at Star. He was indeed defending Mrs Obama, not slurring her in any way. Perhaps he should have known using the word “lynch” nowadays is getting to be a crime so he shouldn’t even have uttered it. But how sad and scary is it that words can now get you in deep trouble or perhaps even charged with a crime. “Track down?” Meaning he would find out her exact words or meaning? So now this is a threatening statement too? How absurd. I shudder to think what will happen to free speech if Obama becomes president.
How did this Star get to be a celebrity anyway? She is a nothing. She showed the level of her mentality on the “View” when she said something to the effect that the war on terror exists because Bush and bin laden are insecure over their manhood, or some idiotic comment like that.
“This is just another example of the left trying to hijack the language and control what can or cannot be said and create a class of victims in the process.”
“a vindictive person will look for occasions for resentment”
White americans need to have many children and watch their borders...or USA will go on a bad path
Oh good grief. O’Reilly didn’t say anything racist. Star needs to get over herself.
I wonder if Star Jones would have Bill O’Reilly thrown in a Paddy Wagon and taken to jail??
Get real! How much of the world do we have to stake off and label as "sacred" just to satisfy an excessively vocal minority?
I think Star Jones said this beacuse her plate of ham and eggs was empty. She had to do someting else with her mouth.
Yes I think that will happen if Obama fails to be annointed POTUS. Personally I am stocking up my ammo supply.
People need to get over it. The term "to get lynched" has often been used in non-racial connotations.
At work, when we negotiate an especially good agreement with a vendor, we say we "lynched" them (and once in awhile, they "lynch" us).
People like Jones who are always looking for reasons to be offended disgust me.
The term “lynching” is not necessarily racist. It comes from an incident that happened in North Dakota, I believe, when an Irishman was hung by a mob o people who were angry about something they perceived he was guilty of. The man’s name was Lynch and so they called this type of action a lynching.
lynching: It defines an out of control mob who pass judgement without a trial or evidence, and then decide to take the law into their own hands and exact justice by hanging.
It’s a good thing I don’t watch or listen to the Hate Speech Factor....
RACISM is still an open festering wound with african american people. sad thing is, Mr. O’Reilly was NOT racist with his words...the lady protests a bit much.
what the heck does “hell to the naw” mean” is it something racist I haven’t heard about against white people?
If he’s so willing to throw us under the bus, I’m more than happy to do the same.
And this is relevant - how?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.