Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama's Brilliant Military Strategy: Cut and Run and Then Run Back
Right Wing News ^ | March 01, 2008 | by Gina Cobb

Posted on 03/01/2008 8:53:19 AM PST by jdm

At the rate Barack Obama is going, his lack of qualification to serve as commander in chief of the U.S. armed forces will be painfully obvious long before November.

The man has far too few carefully considered opinions and far too many shoot-from-the-hip-and-hope-it-sounds-good opinions. Unfortunately, that weakness seems to be shared by the advisors with whom Obama has surrounded himself.

Obama's latest pronouncements on Iraq are a good example of the problem.

From James Taranto at WSJ's Best of the Web (emphasis added):

Cut and Run and Then Run Back

With Hillary Clinton being written off (perhaps prematurely), the eight-month general election campaign between John McCain and Barack Obama seems to be getting under way. Obama, apparently moving to the right, is now threatening military intervention in Iraq after years of demanding America's immediate surrender. As the Associated Press reports:

McCain criticized Obama for saying in Tuesday night's Democratic debate that, after U.S. troops were withdrawn, as president he would act "if al-Qaida is forming a base in Iraq."

"I have some news. Al-Qaida is in Iraq. It's called 'al-Qaida in Iraq,' " McCain told a crowd in Tyler, Texas, drawing laughter at Obama's expense. He said Obama's statement was "pretty remarkable."

Quips Glenn Reynolds: "In Obama's defense, he probably reads the New York Times, which always calls it 'Al Qaida in Mesopotamia.' That may have confused him."

Obama's response to McCain, described in the same AP dispatch, makes even less sense:

"I do know that al-Qaida is in Iraq and that's why I have said we should continue to strike al-Qaida targets," he told a rally at Ohio State University in Columbus.

"But I have some news for John McCain," Obama added. "There was no such thing as al-Qaida in Iraq until George Bush and John McCain decided to invade Iraq. . . . They took their eye off the people who were responsible for 9/11 and that would be al-Qaida in Afghanistan, that is stronger now than at any time since 2001."

Obama said he intended to withdraw U.S. forces from Iraq "so we actually start going after al-Qaida in Afghanistan and in the hills of Pakistan like we should have been doing in the first place."

So let's see if we have this straight. Al Qaeda in Iraq isn't worth fighting because it wouldn't be there if it weren't for Bush and McCain. Obama is going to pull all U.S. troops out of Iraq to go fight in Afghanistan and Pakistan, although he will send them back to Iraq if al Qaeda are there, even though he now wants to withdraw notwithstanding al Qaeda's presence.

Yes, we can!

So Obama's position on the Iraq war -- the major public issue of the day on which he has staked hs campaign and his credibility -- is to pull America's troops out of Iraq right away, abandoning the country to Al Qaeda, only to have America's troops fight their way back in to retake the same ground they previously won at a cost in human lives, and then to (someday) withdraw the same troops again.

Pure folly. Why doesn't Obama show how easy it is to retake ground a second time by, say, giving up half his delegates won in the primaries? He can always win them back if Hillary Clinton makes any inroads, can't he? Yes, we can!

At this point, I'm not sure Obama is qualified to coach a Little League team.


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: barackhusseinobama; barackobama; cicobama; cutandrun; nobama; obama; stategy

1 posted on 03/01/2008 8:53:21 AM PST by jdm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jdm
At this point, I'm not sure Obama is qualified to coach a Little League team.

LOL and bttt!

2 posted on 03/01/2008 8:53:47 AM PST by jdm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jdm

lol


3 posted on 03/01/2008 8:57:17 AM PST by kalee (The offenses we give, we write in the dust; Those we take, we write in marble. JHuett)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jdm
Obama said he would act "if al-Qaida is forming a base in Iraq..."

Then he said: "I do know al-Qaida is in Iraq..."

Hmmm... God help us if this genius ever gets his finger on the button...

4 posted on 03/01/2008 9:03:47 AM PST by Wade827 (Job 21:3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jdm

Well, he could redeploy the troops over the horizon to say, Guam. No, wait, that’s something like what Murtha suggested.


5 posted on 03/01/2008 9:07:16 AM PST by Paladin2 (Huma for co-president!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jdm

This guy is not only a far left liberal-socialist, he is dangerous.


6 posted on 03/01/2008 9:08:41 AM PST by gpapa (Kill the terrorists, protect the borders, punch the hippies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jdm
At the rate Barack Obama is going, his lack of qualification to serve as commander in chief of the U.S. armed forces will be painfully obvious long before November.

...Only with the help of people like this author.
7 posted on 03/01/2008 9:15:42 AM PST by dr_who_2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jdm

The man is a COMMUNITY ORGANIZER not a candidate for the President of the United States.


8 posted on 03/01/2008 9:20:10 AM PST by ronnie raygun (Id rather be hunting with dick than driving with ted)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jdm

mark


9 posted on 03/01/2008 9:40:16 AM PST by Christian4Bush (41-David, End Of Watch. Rest in Peace, SWAT Officer Randall Simmons.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jdm
How is it possible that one of the two largest parties of this nation is trying to propose a candidate that is a half-term junior senator? He's never been on the Armed Services Committee, so what does he know about such serious issues?

He is on the Foreign Affairs Committee, and chairs the European subcommittee, but he admitted the other day that he had not yet called a meeting of this committee. So, that means that he hasn't discussed the crucial issue with the Europeans about beefing up their participation in Afghanistan and Iraq. He does say, however, that when he will be president he will call in all the military commanders and work a solution to extract from Iraq. BS!

I’m moving to another parallel universe; this is all too much for me.

10 posted on 03/01/2008 10:04:03 AM PST by NGC 6822
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jdm
Obama's exchange with McCain shows how confused and convoluted his position on Iraq actually is.

He as much as admitted he was wrong about Al Qaeda being in Iraq in his statement he would only send troops BACK to Iraq if Al Qaeda shows up there.

This guy talks before he thinks and really doesn't seem very bright at all.

11 posted on 03/01/2008 10:05:08 AM PST by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jorge
This guy talks before he thinks and really doesn't seem very bright at all.

He's probably bright, but can't see the light for that huge chip he has on his shoulder.

12 posted on 03/01/2008 10:15:18 AM PST by GVnana ("They're still analyzing the first guy. What do I have to worry about?" - GWB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: jdm

What is scarier yet.... Obama was cheered by the crowd.... some might even have fainted at Obama’s feet.


13 posted on 03/01/2008 10:50:26 AM PST by Tut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jdm
One momement Barack says Al Qaeda is not in Iraq. Another moment Barack says Al Qaeda is in Iraq.

Barack could debate himself.

14 posted on 03/01/2008 4:59:08 PM PST by syriacus (Democrats who prefer to fight wars from a position of weakness can't be trusted with our military.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jdm
Obama has undergone little criticism, especially on national security, because Hillary has attempted to - or been forced to - run to the left of him, which is impossible.

Obama has not yet faced real criticism: that will come on national security and on such things as the right-to-life of the unborn.

Can Obama guard the people of America when he shows little value for guarding the life of the unborn - i. e., for life itself?

15 posted on 03/01/2008 7:59:15 PM PST by mtntop3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jdm
Photobucket
16 posted on 03/01/2008 8:04:17 PM PST by Tex Pete (Obama for Change: from our pockets, our piggy banks, and our couch cushions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jdm

17 posted on 03/01/2008 8:12:43 PM PST by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jdm

18 posted on 03/01/2008 8:24:19 PM PST by doug from upland (Stopping Hillary should be a FreeRepublic Manhattan Project)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jdm

Sadly, this is more a commentary of the electorate than it is the candidate. To many, he Obama is the beacon of sorts... he is the star.


19 posted on 03/01/2008 8:31:03 PM PST by Space Moose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland

Brilliant-a brutally effective ad. Too bad the GOP is too civil to use it.


20 posted on 03/01/2008 8:32:00 PM PST by MattinNJ ("Conservatives" will stay home in November and hand the socialists the election. Unbelievable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson