Posted on 03/26/2008 8:48:38 PM PDT by Deo volente
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton's positive rating has dropped to a new low of 37 percent in an NBC/Wall Street Journal poll released on Wednesday.
According to the poll, the New York senator's positive rating slid 8 percentage points in two weeks and she had a negative rating of 48 percent in a week where she admitted making a mistake in claiming she had come under sniper fire during a 1996 trip to Bosnia.
(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...
There sure isn’t an awful lot to like about the wretch, is there?
Her approval ratings are approaching Bush’s. Not good for her.
Clinton takes hit; but denies inhaling (again).
And Obama leads McCain by 2% in this same poll.
It’s understandable.
Some conservatives hate Clinton so much that refuse to attack Obama. If you look at Drudge’s page right now, you will think yo are in www.barackobama.com
Clinton deserved to be taken out of the race. But shooting a dead body will do us no good. Obama has 99% chances to be McCain’s opponent, therefore we must go after him.
It’s a mistake. It has to be. After all, she’s the smartest woman in the world. In fact, the clintoons are the smartest people in the world. Katie Kolic told us so. remember?
Everyone knows she will steal the nomination come convention time.
I think Al Gore might come in to save the day for the dems, and I doubt he will pick either Hil or ‘Bama as running mates.
In due time. First things first.
Nope. Not a trace of anything to like about her.
An awful lot to fear, however. But Obama’s probably worse, if that’s possible.
If Hillary is so disliked, then how the heck did she win a clear victory in Ohio with her back against the wall? And why is she up in the polls in Pennsylvania? Is it because she gets the anti-Obama vote? Are there good Democrats who won’t vote for a black candidate, even though good Democrats are beyond any racism as they are good liberals.
Obama has 99% chances to be McCain’s opponent, therefore we must go after him.
In due time. First things first.
_________________________________________
Careful what you wish for. McCant’s negatives haven’t been even remotely touched upon yet.
I’d say he loses handily to Obama. Just being realistic.
That makes far too much sense. Drudge will continue running anti-Hillary stories as if completely oblivious to the fact that she’s not even in the freaking lead. Meanwhile, Michelle continued anti-American comments and the growing anti-Israel bias of the Obama campaign won’t even get a blurb on his page.
...of 700 registered voters....
Interesting that there is a wide lead by McCain over both Clinton and Obama in the Rasmussen polling. I have a nasty suspicion that we're seeing is to some extent the "Bradley Effect" -- that the Dems and libs are more likely to be truthful with Rasmussen's computer automated polling than with a live pollster.
Also see here:
NBC-WSJ POLL: NEW CLINTON LOWS (HILLARY BOTTOMING OUT?)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1992268/posts
not to push the nbc poll over rasmussen tracking or gallup tracking, but anyone who knows anything about polls knows tracking polls are BS.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.