Skip to comments.Ancient Weapons Dug Up In India (15-20,000 Year Old)
Posted on 03/28/2008 8:11:07 PM PDT by blam
Ancient weapons dug up in India
By Amitabha Bhattasali
BBC News, Calcutta
Stone age weapons are not usually found in such an old soil layer
Archaeologists in the eastern Indian state of West Bengal have discovered small weapons made of stone which are around 15,000-20,000 years old.
The artefacts - dating to the Stone Age - were found during excavations in Murshidabad district, near Bangladesh.
Archaeologists say the find is potentially significant as it suggests man's presence in the area dates back much earlier than previously believed.
Finds such as this on the floodplains of the River Ganges are very rare.
However, there is ample evidence of stone age activity in India's upland regions.
The weapons - which include small axes - were discovered at Ekani-Chandpara village near Sagardighi, which is an ancient site.
This is one of a number of pots found at the site
Archaeologists say the weapons were found from a soil layer belonging to the mid-Pleistocene period - much below the Holocene layer where present human habitation takes place.
"We have not only discovered the weapons at this site, but raw materials and the scraps were also found," Dr Gautam Sengupta, director of the State Archaeology Department, told the BBC.
"This proves that the weapons were made at this place itself."
Another reason why the find is so significant, archaeologists say, is because Stone Age weapons are not normally found at such an old soil layer in the Gangetic alluvial plains.
However it is well known that raw materials for making weapons are easily found in the plateau region and most Stone Age discoveries are from this area.
So far, no human fossils or remains other than some charcoal have been found at the site.
Scientists have yet to confirm how old the charcoal is.
The archaeologists were surprised by what they found
"The history of civilisation in this region has suddenly gone back by around 20,000 years," one archaeologist said.
After the discovery, two eminent geo-archaeologists - Prof SN Rajguru and Dr Bhaskar Deotare - visited the excavation site and confirmed that the weapons date back to the smaller Stone Age.
The discovery was made by chance, Dr Sengupta said.
"We were digging the site for some archaeological evidence of the Sultanate period. We were expecting some ancient artefacts related to Sultan Hussein Shah," he said - referring to a former ruler from the area.
"We did find those, but our archaeologists kept on digging to unearth some more historical evidence of that period and now we have found these Stone Age weapons," Dr Sengupta said.
After winding up the excavation at Ekani Chandpara in a couple of weeks, archaeologists are planning to launch a search for ancient human habitation in a wider area.
>>”The history of civilisation in this region has suddenly gone back by around 20,000 years,” one archaeologist said.<<
Back to 20,000 years... not by 20,000 years.
Looks like rocks to me.
Glad I wasn’t the only one that thought so.
Iconic finds appear to be anti-liberal in nature.
Yup. I believe a clay pot at that age is a problem.
They’ll figure out some way to explain it. Like a tooth becomes a 18 foot long lizard with antlers.
The emperor has no clothes
Re: the pottery ... it’s probably poor writing or editing of the article
Shekels to doughnuts the pottery was dug up in the Sultanate layer ... should have been labeled as such.
I see rocks too.
No mistaking the pottery though.
All I see is rocks as well. The clay pot can’t be that old. Something is amiss in this article.
I’ve got rocks like that in my driveway. I’m going to go apply for a research grant.........
It is hard to tell from the photo, particularly as there is no scale.
They sure don't look like projectile weapons, and unless they are much bigger than they appear I don't see how they could be used on an ax.
I guess they must be very primitive tools and bigger than they appear.
Its really hard to analyze stone tools from a picture with no scale!
Yeah, I thought it was first smoked by ancient hindu sages to kill the sex drive.
Those tools look really crude by paleolithic standards.
Acheulian, I’d say.
· Mirabilis · Texas AM Anthropology News · Yahoo Anthro & Archaeo ·
· History or Science & Nature Podcasts · Excerpt, or Link only? · cgk's list of ping lists ·
Were they assault weapons? ;-)
Do we Assume that these rocks have some evidence of fashioning into tools by human hands?
They are described as “small” but we get no actual size parameters. The fact that the archeologists found it necessary to describe them as “small” makes me a little leery.
If they are small, do we assume they were designed for small warriors?
Sometimes a rock is just a rock.
They look more like asphalt weapons
The key difference is bifacial flaking. If you have repeated flake removal on both sides of the stone it is extremely unlikely to be natural.
I’m no expert by any means, but I sure would think these were ordinary rocks if I found them on the ground.
I was really hoping for the flying disc of fire from The Mahabharata.