Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

THIS IS NO BELLY GAFFE (PREGNANT POP AIMS TO DELIVER)
NY Post ^ | March 29, 2008 | JENNIFER FERMINO

Posted on 03/29/2008 11:00:11 AM PDT by presidio9

A pregnant Oregon man who sports a beard with his baby bump insists he is "perfectly capable" of giving birth despite years of hormone treatments to make him a male.

"I'm a person and I have the right to have my own biological child," Thomas Beatie, 34, told Oprah Winfrey for a show airing next Thursday.

Beatie made worldwide headlines after announcing his extraordinary pregnancy in The Advocate magazine - and posing topless to show off his bulging belly, pancake bosom and mounds of armpit hair.

"Wanting to have a biological child is neither a male nor a female desire, but a human desire," he wrote in the April 8 issue of the magazine, geared toward gays, lesbians and transgender people.

Beatie legally became a man after undergoing a sex-change operation, but he kept his female reproductive organs.

In order to conceive, he said, he stopped taking his twice-weekly testosterone injections and started getting his period after an eight-year hiatus.

He used a sperm donor to get pregnant and did not require fertility treatments.

The macho mama, who is due this summer, said he decided to carry the baby because his wife, Nancy Richards, couldn't conceive.

"Who hires a surrogate if they are perfectly capable of carrying their own child?" he said in an interview for next week's People magazine, portions of which were released yesterday.

Beatie acknowledges he and his wife are in uncharted territory and that much of the reaction has been negative.

"Health-care professionals have refused to call me by a male pronoun or recognize Nancy as my wife. Receptionists have laughed at us. Friends and family have been unsupportive," he wrote.

When he suffered an ectopic pregnancy in his initial attempt at conception, his brother told him it was probably

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: homosexualagenda
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-74 last
To: presidio9

NOT A POP NO MATTER OW MUCH THE PC MEDIA CALLS HER SO...!


51 posted on 03/29/2008 11:56:30 AM PDT by JSDude1 (http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=56306 "MoveON McCain" To find McCain's Sorros)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the invisib1e hand
what, I wonder, will all those hormones do the child that this demented woman is carrying?

Probably nothing, seeing as Beatie stopped taking the hormones. So, we have a person who is genetically female, anatomically female and biochemically female, but has a flat chest and hairy armpits.

If that makes Beatie a male, doesn't that mean 99% of the city of Berkeley is male?

52 posted on 03/29/2008 12:00:47 PM PDT by lgwdnbdgr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: NoGrayZone

Does that make her partner Nancy gay?


53 posted on 03/29/2008 12:18:51 PM PDT by definitelynotaliberal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: definitelynotaliberal

I would assume it to “elevate” her to lesbian status. Now they can both be a proud member of DU!!!!


54 posted on 03/29/2008 12:20:56 PM PDT by NoGrayZone (A Lesser Evil Is Still Evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
This sounds like that extremely stupid Six Flags radio spot where the two film critics are reviewing "Pregnant Dad":

"[hrallllllph!!!] I think I'm gonna be sick."
"Naw, dude! You're gonna be a mom."

55 posted on 03/29/2008 12:35:23 PM PDT by RichInOC (...William Frank Buckley, Jr., November 24, 1925-February 27, 2008, R.I.P.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
A pregnant Oregon man

She is not a "man". Why does the media insist on calling someone what they want to be called?

56 posted on 03/29/2008 12:45:06 PM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Beatie legally became a man after undergoing a sex-change operation, but he kept his female reproductive organs.

Then she is legally a woman. Period.

57 posted on 03/29/2008 12:46:04 PM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

This is sssooo wrong. If he/she/it wants to change gender, then fine, but don’t turn around and decide you want to be what you were originally because it affords you other benefits.


58 posted on 03/29/2008 12:47:44 PM PDT by lilylangtree (Veni, Vidi, Vici)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OpusatFR
She’s a woman who has had massive amounts of hormones, breast amputation, and needs mental help.

Hopefully her hormone treatments will not be damaging to the baby

59 posted on 03/29/2008 12:52:52 PM PDT by SauronOfMordor (When injustice becomes law, rebellion becomes duty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Don’t believe it for a second.


60 posted on 03/29/2008 1:37:46 PM PDT by TASMANIANRED (TAZ:Untamed, Unpredictable, Uninhibited.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

It is not a “he”. It is a she with serious psychological problems.


61 posted on 03/29/2008 3:11:20 PM PDT by Bubba_Leroy ("I believe in Santa Claus. I believe in the tooth fairy." - John Edwards)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

It’s not a human. It’s gonna be a baby elephant. I see it’s trunk already hanging out.


62 posted on 03/29/2008 3:30:41 PM PDT by boothead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

“Health-care professionals have refused to call me by a male pronoun or recognize Nancy as my wife. Receptionists have laughed at us. Friends and family have been unsupportive,” he wrote. “

Geez, I wonder why. These people are insane.


63 posted on 03/29/2008 3:47:52 PM PDT by headstamp 2 (Been here before)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SauronOfMordor

If she continues to take testosterone it will damage the child.

I can’t imagine she would and that the OB would allow it, but she’s obviously nuts.


64 posted on 03/29/2008 3:48:21 PM PDT by OpusatFR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
"Wanting to have a biological child is neither a male nor a female desire, but a human desire,"

This is news to me! I've never met another man who had the desire to be the carrier of the baby. I'd rather stick to getting her the ice cream at 3 in the morning, thanks.
By the way, this concept was MUCH funnier when it was the Governator in a movie.
65 posted on 03/29/2008 7:14:47 PM PDT by jack_napier (Bob? Gun.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paved Paradise

She didn’t become a male, she’s just deluded enough to think she is.


66 posted on 03/30/2008 3:59:55 AM PDT by darkangel82 (If you're not part of the solution, you are part of the problem. (Say no to RINOs))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: pillut48

I don’t know where you grew up, but I consider it a very vulgar term - it is not a “bump,” it’s a baby. Sorry to disagree.


67 posted on 03/30/2008 4:49:49 PM PDT by Paved Paradise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: darkangel82

I agree.


68 posted on 03/30/2008 4:50:47 PM PDT by Paved Paradise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Paved Paradise

I grew up in Fort Worth, and actually first heard the phrase in my baptist church, much to the delight of the older ladies making a fuss over a mama-to-be. I’m 46 now and in all my years, NEVER come across someone who found the phrase ‘vulgar’, and I’ve lived all over the north Texas area and northern California area—your mileage may vary, though, depending on your region and religion, I guess! [shrugs]

Not sure if you’ve been around a pregnant person before, but when the belly starts stretching (as mine is doing at this very moment) a bump (generally called the baby bump, not just ‘bump’ in most cases, although I knew a woman who called hers “The Bump” before she knew the gender affectionately) indeed does form—a living bump with a beautiful heartbeat (in my case, 2 beautiful heartbeats :*) that is now moving on it’s own when one of the babies kicks/punches inside. :*) One of the most wonderful, glorious feelings I’ve ever felt in my entire life!! :*) Not a single thing ‘vulgar’ about it, IMO.


69 posted on 03/30/2008 7:15:55 PM PDT by pillut48 (CJ in TX --Soccer Mom and proud Rush Conservative with no dog in the presidential race now *sigh*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: pillut48

Regardless of whether you have heard anyone use the term vulgar, one of the definitions of vulgar is, “lacking refinement;” another is “of ordinary people’s language” and, indeed, the term “baby bump” is vulgar by that definition. I have been around plenty of pregnant women and myself was one some 32 years ago and, no, that term was never used. I don’t know about “Texas,” or North Carolina, but, trust me, religion has nothing to do with it.

I have noticed that the past several years have shown an increasing decline in manners, specifically in regards to the use of language. There is much in our language that, while not directly profane, is very vulgar. I admit I have occasionally uttered words that years ago would have been very improper for a lady to say (e.g. the word(s) crap or crappy as in “I had a crappy day”) and remember being chastised for saying that word.

I try to stay classy and have my own struggles, so I definitely won’t be adding “baby bump” to my vocabulary.


70 posted on 03/31/2008 11:13:25 AM PDT by Paved Paradise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: pillut48

Oh, I almost forgot - congrats on your two little ones - blessings to you all.


71 posted on 03/31/2008 11:14:29 AM PDT by Paved Paradise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Paved Paradise

YMMV.

I feel VERY classy as I watch my baby bumps growing bigger and bigger each day :*) and my husband and my daughter are quite proud of the babies too (after all we went through for them to be here) so I guess we will have to agree to disagree. :-)


72 posted on 03/31/2008 11:30:25 AM PDT by pillut48 (CJ in TX --Soccer Mom and proud Rush Conservative with no dog in the presidential race now *sigh*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Paved Paradise

Thank you! God has definitely blessed us most abundantly! :*)


73 posted on 03/31/2008 11:31:06 AM PDT by pillut48 (CJ in TX --Soccer Mom and proud Rush Conservative with no dog in the presidential race now *sigh*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
This is just a common outworking of the type of screwed up liberal philosophy that typifies leftist states such as Oregon. Ironically, early on, Oregon was a state that amended it's constitution to establish what true marriage is.

Everyone, deep down, really knows that this is just a pregnant woman impersonating a man. I think that states which are considering a marriage amendment ought to, at the same time, establish by amendment the obvious fact of what "male" and "female" are.

74 posted on 04/03/2008 9:07:04 PM PDT by fwdude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-74 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson