Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Watergate book says John Dean ordered break-in
Reuters ^ | May 19, 2008 | Steve Holland

Posted on 05/19/2008 8:05:22 AM PDT by tlb

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A new book on the scandal that brought down President Richard Nixon alleges that White House counsel John Dean ordered the infamous Watergate break-in in 1972, a charge Dean strongly rejected.

James Rosen, a Fox News Channel correspondent in Washington, made the charge based on interviews and an exhaustive review of documents for "The Strong Man: John Mitchell and the Secrets of Watergate."

Dean called Rosen's assertion "pathetic."

Rosen quoted from a 1990 interview from another central Watergate figure, Jeb Magruder, that "the first plan that we got had been initiated by Dean."

To help build his case, Rosen quoted from a statement that Magruder made in a legal deposition in 1995 about "Gemstone," Watergate planner G. Gordon Liddy's code-name for the burglary:

"Question: 'Is it true that John Dean was one of the people in the White House that was pushing for the Gemstone plan?'

"Magruder: 'Yes.'

"Question: ... Is it, in fact, truthful that you and John Dean had prior knowledge of the Watergate break-in?'

"Magruder: 'Yes."'

Dean told Reuters, "I hope this book is being sold as fiction, for if it is not, readers are being defrauded."

"His conclusions are pathetic. Rosen has simply ignored all the sworn testimony to the contrary, including my own," he said.

Rosen's book also alleges that the doomed wiretapping was deliberately sabotaged by the CIA.

Rosen says he had a rich trove of previously undiscovered information to scour for his book, including 5,000 pages of executive session testimony by key witnesses before the Senate Watergate committee, including Dean, Magruder, James McCord, E. Howard Hunt and Alexander Haig.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bookreview; johnmitchell; secrets; strongman; trongman; watergate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-56 next last
It will be interesting if this gets someday nailed down. I'm guessing Dean won't sue.
1 posted on 05/19/2008 8:05:23 AM PDT by tlb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: tlb

John Dean is not one of my favorite people to put it mildly. He would sell his soul to save his hide.


2 posted on 05/19/2008 8:07:23 AM PDT by IMissPresidentReagan (The only thing dumber than a Republican or a Democrat is when the two work together - Lewis Black)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tlb
This would be much more interesting if it was Jimmy Dean.


3 posted on 05/19/2008 8:08:07 AM PDT by arderkrag (Libertarian Nutcase (Political Compass Coordinates: 9.00, -2.62 - www.politicalcompass.org))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tlb
The headline reads

New Watergate book says John Dean ordered break-in

but if Dean was not a media darling, but a media enemy, the headline would read

John Dean ordered Watergate break-in, new book says

.
4 posted on 05/19/2008 8:10:16 AM PDT by Jeff Chandler (This tagline has been banned or suspended.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tlb

One of the best non-fiction books I ever read in my life was ‘Silent Coup’.
I am looking forward to this book.


5 posted on 05/19/2008 8:10:26 AM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IMissPresidentReagan
Forgot to add to my post
"His conclusions are pathetic. Rosen has simply ignored all the sworn testimony to the contrary, including my own," he said.

I love how Dean thinks that his testimony should be the deciding factor in how people judge the authenticity of this book. Yea, it's totally beyond the realm for someone to "misconstrue" the truth (under oath or not) to save their tookus.
6 posted on 05/19/2008 8:10:58 AM PDT by IMissPresidentReagan (The only thing dumber than a Republican or a Democrat is when the two work together - Lewis Black)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

“There is nothing lower than the Agent Provocotuer.” - Churchill


7 posted on 05/19/2008 8:11:56 AM PDT by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: arderkrag

He makes good sausages.


8 posted on 05/19/2008 8:12:03 AM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: tlb
Despite my young age at the time I was somewhat of an authority on all things Watergate I read the news cover to cover on it all every day. Afterwards I devoured everything I could read by everyone involved. That said, I think this charge is a bit silly. (and I'm no defender of Dean who is a complete ass in my opinion.)
9 posted on 05/19/2008 8:12:42 AM PDT by ElkGroveDan (The road to hell is paved with the stones of pragmatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

Correct. By the time “history” is done with him, Dean will be portrayed as just another victim. He was forced to be involved by some super-secret arm of the CIA that only helps Republican presidents do their dastardly deeds. In fact, I believe it was Karl Rove himself who held the gun to his head.


10 posted on 05/19/2008 8:14:23 AM PDT by threeleftsmakearight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: tlb
Daniel Ellsberg, btw, who 'acquired' the Pentagon Papers and then passed them along to the New York Slime...i mean Times , is a signatory to the 'World Can't Wait' call to 'Drive Out the Bush Regime'. World Can't Wait--Drive Out the Bush Regime is a Maoist front organization for the Revolutionary Communist Party founded by Charles Clark Kissinger , a longtime leader of the Revolutionary Communist Party .

Watergate timeline:

"1964: U.S. involvement in the Vietnam War officially begins.

Daniel Ellsberg begins work at The Pentagon.

Ellsberg acquires the Pentagon Papers.

Ellsberg gives copies to Neil Sheehan.

June 13, 1971: The New York Times begins to publish them.

The Washington Post soon follows. Richard Nixon reacts with outrage."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Watergate_timeline

11 posted on 05/19/2008 8:14:39 AM PDT by Eye On The Left
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

Yes, that book was VERY informative and quite helpful in sorting out what actually happened. Dean, of course, blasted the book.


12 posted on 05/19/2008 8:15:16 AM PDT by miele man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan

But I’ve always thought Rosen was a careful journalist. I’d give him more credibility over Dean, at least enough to consider his charges.


13 posted on 05/19/2008 8:15:43 AM PDT by twigs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: tlb

My theory is that it had something to with Dean’s wife, who before they got married was rooming with a hooker who may or may not have been one of the hookers the Dems were running to reward donors and political allies.

What kind of woman rooms with a hooker?


14 posted on 05/19/2008 8:19:40 AM PDT by PLMerite ("Unarmed, one can only flee from Evil. But Evil isn't overcome by fleeing from it." Jeff Cooper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tlb

Who freakin’ cares?


15 posted on 05/19/2008 8:20:12 AM PDT by clee1 (We use 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 2 to pull a trigger. I'm lazy and I'm tired of smiling.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: twigs

"I got the idea from my hot motorcycle-driving girlfriend."

16 posted on 05/19/2008 8:23:04 AM PDT by Diogenesis (Igitur qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: tlb
G. Gordon Liddy has been saying this on his talk show for years.
17 posted on 05/19/2008 8:24:16 AM PDT by Dixie Yooper (Ephesians 6:11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IMissPresidentReagan

Dean is a spineless, wimpy coward.


18 posted on 05/19/2008 8:24:28 AM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tlb

G. Gordon Liddy has been claiming this for years.


19 posted on 05/19/2008 8:27:22 AM PDT by MuttTheHoople
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tlb

The first book that fingered Dean.

20 posted on 05/19/2008 8:34:17 AM PDT by bmwcyle (If God wanted us to be Socialist, Karl Marx would have been born in America in 1730.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freekitty
Dean is a spineless, wimpy coward.

Agreed. John Dean was not only as slimy as some of Bill Clinton's more noxious associates, but he also put on an air of moral superiority during the Watergate hearings, with his ex-hooker spouse dressed up like a respectable middle class lady. At least Clinton's creeps made little pretense about being anything other than political operatives.

21 posted on 05/19/2008 8:38:04 AM PDT by Wallace T.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

If I remember correctly, Liddy interviewed the authors of that book who claimed that Dean’s wife was a hooker and that the breakin was ordered BY DEAN to investigate her and who ‘knew’ her

remember anything like that?


22 posted on 05/19/2008 8:38:40 AM PDT by RaceBannon (Innocent until proven guilty; The Pendleton 8: We are not going down without a fight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard
He makes good sausages.

John Dean is a little wiener, that's true.

23 posted on 05/19/2008 8:42:21 AM PDT by llevrok (I don't think outside the box. There is no box in my world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: arderkrag
"This would be much more interesting if it was Jimmy Dean."

Yeah, but they couldn't do that without offending the muslims.

24 posted on 05/19/2008 8:44:43 AM PDT by Jaxter ("Vivit Post Funera Virtus")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Eye On The Left

You know... the thing that still eludes me about Watergate remains: Why?

Nixon certainly didn’t need anything from that office. He was winning easily. But somebody thought there was something to gain. Though who, and what was it?

That’s never made any sense to me.


25 posted on 05/19/2008 8:45:36 AM PDT by Ramius (Personally, I give us... one chance in three. More tea?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: PLMerite
My theory is that it had something to with Dean’s wife, who before they got married was rooming with a hooker who may or may not have been one of the hookers the Dems were running to reward donors and political allies.

Someone on a TV talk show years ago (over 10, I think) said that Dean had masterminded the break-in to recover materials that might have exposed his wife for, uh, sexual irregularities. Wish I could remember the details . . .

26 posted on 05/19/2008 8:45:36 AM PDT by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: maryz

The wife of John Dean, Elizabeth Beiner Dean, was a prostitute before she married the President’s Chief Counsel, G. Gordon Liddy has said. Apparently, the future Mrs. Dean willingly participated in an FBI undercover operation whose goal was to bust the very call girl ring that she was involved in. Apparently, the woman had a special relationship with the Counsel to President Nixon...she would eventually become his wife.

According to Liddy, who was one of President Nixon’s Watergate “plumbers,” the Madame of the whore house in which Mrs. Dean worked could be seen in the Dean wedding photos!

Mrs. Dean’s superior in the FBI investigation, which was occurring across from the Watergate hotel: W. Mark Felt.


27 posted on 05/19/2008 8:49:30 AM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Ramius

Hmmm... now I see a couple of intriguing answers. If that’s all it took, and Dean wouldn’t cop to it, he’s even more of a weasel than I thought he was.


28 posted on 05/19/2008 8:51:39 AM PDT by Ramius (Personally, I give us... one chance in three. More tea?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: kcvl

Uh, interesting, but if the bride was the agent that busted the call girl ring, why would the Madame be at the wedding?


29 posted on 05/19/2008 8:55:26 AM PDT by Ramius (Personally, I give us... one chance in three. More tea?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Ramius

Feb 10, 1997

New allegations have emerged in hundreds of papers filed recently in United States District Court in Washington that allegedly link Dean’s wife Maureen to a Capitol Hill sex ring. If true, the allegations could force the Deans to back out of the $150 million libel suit they filed five years ago against St. Martin’s Press Inc., publishers of Silent Coup, and its authors Len Colodny and Robert Gettlin.

The new charges, hotly denied by Dean, are intended to support what Liddy and others have been saying: The Watergate break-in had nothing to do with President Nixon but was a personal enterprise by Dean to protect his then-girlfriend Maureen by removing information that linked her to a call-girl ring run out of the Democratic National Committee headquarters in the Watergate.

But Dean’s Los Angeles attorney, John Garrick, insists Maureen was never a prostitute or friend of the mob. “There was no call-girl ring running out of the DNC,” Garrick tells Insight. “They have nothing to support it. Their whole story breaks down.” The Deans declined comment.

Sources familiar with the suit say the Dean team spent at least three days in early January trying to settle the suit. The one-time Nixon legal counsel, who implicated his superiors in the Watergate scandal and served four months in prison, took exception to the 1991 books assertion that it was he who masterminded the Watergate break-in and cover-up to get information on the escort service. The book claims escorts were provided from the Columbia Plaza Hotel, near the Watergate, to out-of-town Democrats. The book also asserts that the madam was tied to the mob and a close friend of Mo Dean.

The Deans naturally did not like Liddy’s suggestions that Maureen was more than just a friend to the madam or his labeling John a “serial perjurer.” Nor did the Deans take kindly to the madam’s lawyer and convicted pimp Phillip Mackin Bailley being a source for Silent Coup. Bailley’s address book linked Maureen to the call-girl operation, and spurred Johns interest in the break-in, according to the Colodny and Gettlin book, but Garrick denies Maureen was in the address book. The Deans responded by suing both Liddy and Bailley.

In December, Colodny’s attorneys dumped a 4,200-page summary-judgment motion into Dean’s lap, asking U.S. Magistrate Alan Kay to dismiss the case. Dean immediately requested a continuance to respond to the motion. It was a briar patch. The motion itself stands 2 feet high with 774 separate exhibits, including a section dedicated to outing Maureen as an alleged prostitute, which the book never directly stated. The allegations, if true, could bolster one of the theories from Silent Coup that John learned about the call-girl connection to DNC from his then-girlfriend Maureen and tried to protect her.

http://tinyurl.com/6gx24c


30 posted on 05/19/2008 8:55:52 AM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: PLMerite

I happened to catch James Rosen on C-SPAN last night - he hinted that the reason for the burglary was related to Dean’s wife and a call girl ring that catered to Democrats.

http://www.amazon.com/Strong-Man-Mitchell-Secrets-Watergate/dp/0385508646/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1211212320&sr=1-1


31 posted on 05/19/2008 9:01:16 AM PDT by Ben Hecks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: MuttTheHoople
G. Gordon Liddy has been claiming this for years.

I recall GL saying that as well.

32 posted on 05/19/2008 9:03:18 AM PDT by Loyal Buckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: tlb

Date: 7/6/1992

At the time, Mitchell admitted that he, along with White House counsel John Dean and CRP deputy head Jeb Magruder, listened to various illegal schemes G. Gordon Liddy proposed without doing much to derail them. But Mitchell denied that he had ever given any positive authorization for the break-ins. He also denied that he tried to spring burglar James McCord from jail, by all accounts the very first act in the cover-up.

Mitchell’s denials fell on deaf ears. But now, as Watergate aficionados start their twentieth-anniversary celebration, a new trial lumbers toward its day in court, reopening the questions that have haunted historians for two decades: Who ordered the Watergate burglaries, and why?

Historian Stanley Kutler asked Mitchell nine months before his death, ‘What would you want to see, if there were an account of Watergate, that hasn’t been said?”

MITCHELL: I don’t know how you are going to get at it, but I would like to know how the whole damned thing started.

KUTLER: You are talking about the break-in?

MITCHELL: Yes . . . That to me has been a question all along. Who in the hell did start this thing, and how did it get moving and rolling to the point it did?

Last year, St. Martin’s Press published a book that claimed to have the answers to John Mitchell’s questions. Silent Coup appeared after seven years of research by political consultant and businessman Len Colodny and Newhouse reporter Robert Gettlin. Silent Coup offers new spins on every plot twist in the scandal. To attempt such sweeping revisionism, Colodny and Gettlin tape-recorded 160 interviews (all but ten on the record), and pored over tape transcripts, court transcripts, memoranda, evidentiary exhibits, raw FBI reports, complete Oval Office logs, memoirs, and on and on.

Silent Coup attributes to Dean and Magruder many acts that these two men in court and elsewhere—had attributed to John Mitchell. G. Gordon Liddy, heretofore recognized as the “mastermind” of the break-ins, was, we are told, a dupe, unaware of even the true target of the missions. Instead, the book claims that the break-ins were undertaken at the behest of John Dean, who allegedly sought to retrieve evidence linking his attractive soon-tobe wife Maureen to a Washington callgirl outfit.

http://tinyurl.com/5fapvz


33 posted on 05/19/2008 9:09:48 AM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tlb

How amazing given that Dean has long been the darling of the liberal MSM (and had turned on all the REPUBS he could).


34 posted on 05/19/2008 9:12:20 AM PDT by rod1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arderkrag

Then it would have to be called Sausagegate.


35 posted on 05/19/2008 9:14:31 AM PDT by rod1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rod1

You know, that kind of revisionist history is the kind I could handle.


36 posted on 05/19/2008 9:27:16 AM PDT by arderkrag (Libertarian Nutcase (Political Compass Coordinates: 9.00, -2.62 - www.politicalcompass.org))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: tlb

Dean turned on his fellow conspirators in exchange for leniency. He was a key player in the break-in, and his protestations are laughable and pathetic.

He is, after all, a lawyer who took large amounts of cash to the Watergate defendants to buy their silence.


37 posted on 05/19/2008 9:29:47 AM PDT by popdonnelly (Concerned about the price of arugula)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kcvl

Thanks!


38 posted on 05/19/2008 9:35:00 AM PDT by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: tlb; All

Dean had a prostitute girl friend

the ring she was affiliated with had someone sitting at a desk in the DNC

Dean personally got this confirmed from friends in the FBI

he wanted them to get the address book (containing his name and number) from the desk of his girlfriend’s contact then working as a ‘secretary’ in the DNC

his FBI friends didn’t want to ‘break in’

Dean found another way

he was then and remains one of the most self-serving rogues in American political history


39 posted on 05/19/2008 9:38:42 AM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tlb
You may know the history of this, but I didn't know the recent developments until last year when I was publishing an entry on this in my forthcoming book, "48 Liberal Lies About History." One entry was on Dean masterminding the break-in, as per Colodny and Gettlin's "Silent Coup." It turns out, they were sued by Dean and the publisher settled out of court. MY publisher wouldn't even let me quote their assertions for fear of getting sued. I could only quote from the court depositions.

So now there may be some truth to the "Silent Coup" argument after all!

40 posted on 05/19/2008 9:44:51 AM PDT by LS (CNN is the Amtrak of News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tlb
Wikipedia:
Dean chronicled his White House experiences, with a focus on Watergate, in the memoirs Blind Ambition and Lost Honor. Blind Ambition would become the point of controversy many years after its publication.

In 1992, he hired famed attorney Neil Papiano and brought the first in a series of defamation suits against G. Gordon Liddy for claims in his book Will and St. Martin's Press for its publication of the book Silent Coup by Len Colodny and Robert Gettlin. Silent Coup alleged that Dean was the mastermind of the Watergate burglaries, and the true target of the burglaries was to seize information implicating Dean and Maureen Biner (his then-fiancée) in a prostitution ring. After hearing of Colodny's work, Liddy issued a revised paperback version of Will supporting Colodny's theory. This theory was subsequently the subject of an A&E Network Investigative Reports series program entitled The Key to Watergate in 1992. Liddy's defense team focused on allegations that Blind Ambition was ghost written by Taylor Branch, a charge that Dean denies to this day.

In the preface to his 2006 book, Conservatives Without Conscience, Dean strongly denied Colodny's theory, pointing out that the Colodny's chief source (Phillip Mackin Bailley) had been in and out of mental institutions. Dean settled the defamation suit against Colodny and his publisher, St. Martin's Press, on terms which Dean stated in the book's preface he could not divulge under the terms of the settlement, other than stating that "the Deans were satisfied." In the footnote to this portion of the preface, Dean stated that the federal judge handling the case forced a settlement with Liddy.

... Dean frequently serves as a guest on the MSNBC show, Countdown with Keith Olbermann ...

Says something about Olbermann, more or less.
41 posted on 05/19/2008 9:45:33 AM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

See my comments on this book, above.


42 posted on 05/19/2008 9:47:42 AM PDT by LS (CNN is the Amtrak of News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: PLMerite

This has been something GG Liddy has discussed for many years on his radio show. Hasn’t he been pointing the finger at Dean?


43 posted on 05/19/2008 9:48:37 AM PDT by weegee (We cant keep our homes on 72 at all times & just expect that other countries are going to say OK -BO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: tlb
Thanks for the post. I will be reading this book.

In 1991, Silent Coup was published (Colodny and Getlin, St. Martin's Press). It exposed the Washington Post/Woodward/Bernstein version of Watergate as deeply flawed. Sixty Minutes was to feature the book, but canceled the segment at the request of their buddies over at the Post.

Silent Coup laid out the facts showing that John Dean was a sniveling, ambitious, corrupt little worm who was eager to exploit the paranoia of the Nixon Administration by using his position as White House Counsel to become a conduit for secret intelligence and dirty tricks to curry favor with the higher-ups. When the deal blew up in his face, he was able to adroitly convince Halderman /Erlichman that John Mitchell was the one pushing the scheme while allowing Mitchell to assume Halderman/Erlichman were behind the operation. He then secured a sweetheart deal from the prosecutors and the Dems by helping them nail Nixon. He has become a darling of the Left since then.

This new book will undoubtedly be discredited by the MSM as a right-wing hack job and will probably not be able to overcome such attacks simply because Watergate is now such ancient news, but it will be of great interest to those of us who have continued to be interested in how this story was played in the late 1970's, including how easy it was for John Dean to dupe the public with the help of very willing accomplices in the media.

44 posted on 05/19/2008 9:51:19 AM PDT by San Jacinto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

See my post, above, on my experience with this.


45 posted on 05/19/2008 9:51:26 AM PDT by LS (CNN is the Amtrak of News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon
If I remember correctly, Liddy interviewed the authors of that book who claimed that Dean’s wife was a hooker and that the breakin was ordered BY DEAN to investigate her and who ‘knew’ her

Yep. That's in part what led Dean to sue Liddy. G said he actually learned a lot of things he never knew before that were documented in 'Silent Coup'.

46 posted on 05/19/2008 10:33:12 AM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan

I was in college at the time and followed the Watergate news very closely. During the summer I would come home from my job and immediately plant myself in front of the TV to watch the hearings (yeah, I was a politics nerd even back then).

One thing that always nagged at me was how quickly Dean flipped. I mean, it was a mind-boggling complete 180. One day the Democrats were calling him a sleazy, lying bastard and the next day the Republicans were calling him a sleazy, lying bastard.

(Ironically, I believe both sides were correct.)

Dean’s fingerprints are all over the break-in. As another poster pointed out, the break-in made no sense on the face of it. It never did. The only question about the ‘72 election was how big of a landslide Nixon would get. Mo Dean is the link.


47 posted on 05/19/2008 10:59:11 AM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard
Yep - “Silent Coup” is an excellent and entertaining read and VERY well documented. It has been awhile since I've read it - but grab it to look up things when something prompts me in the news. There was a news story a few years ago about an Admiral that was accused of dealing in military arms. He said something like “It is preposterous, unbelievable, that I would be involved in something like this”. His name sounded familiar and he was in Silent Coup, in the chapters on how the military was going around the state department on certain matters. In the book, when accused of this, he used almost the exact same quote forty years earlier!
48 posted on 05/19/2008 11:07:21 AM PDT by 21twelve (Don't wish for peace. Pray for Victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: tlb

didn’t GGL make this assertion a decade ago?...Mo Dean was on a call girl list in DNC HQ so Dean got the perfect patsy in attack dog (GGL) to do a black bag job...


49 posted on 05/19/2008 11:59:06 AM PDT by databoss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tlb

Wasn’t there an earlier book suggesting the same thing? I believe it suggested Dean was concerned that his then girl friend had a room mate who was linked to a possible prostitution ring operating out of the Democrats headquarters.


50 posted on 05/19/2008 12:01:31 PM PDT by kathsua (A woman can do anything a man can do and have babies besides.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson