Posted on 06/09/2008 8:40:06 PM PDT by EtheWise
Tolerence is not a Rat characteristic. Anybody to the Right of Stalin will not be acceptable.
Pray for W and Our Troops
The “hateful left” was very much alive and well in 1992. The Clintons were an integral part of its making. Maybe even the locomotive.
Hillary would have lost no matter how left she was. The Beast lost because she was replaced with someone far more hip and cool. Lets face it, to the moonbat left old and white is soooo 20th century, even being female could not overcome those two anchors.
I honestly believe that ONLY someone like Obama could ensure McCain wins 44 states.
However, the next cankled candidate concluding a childhood dream chained to a cheating husband now understands how far to the left she must travel to win the nomination. (Lots of words beginning with 'c', I could not bring myself to use The 'c' word though)
For all of her faults, Hillary Clinton was the driving force behind the Clinton political machine. I can think of no other woman who can simply move to a state and declare herself a resident simply to win a Senate seat. That takes talent and organization. I would take a President Hillary over a President Barack any day of the week. She is by far more qualified, more sober and more conservative than Obama. All we need to know is that the nutroot liberals grew to hate her and love him. That is enough for me to declare that she was the better statesman.
And soon, the hateful left will control every branch of our government (for your own good of course.) :D
New to Freerepublic I see. Probably won’t be around long.
The rodent is skeptical at best...
I never associated Hillary with being a "conservative" or a "statesman". Singing Hillary's praises won't make you any friends around here, newbie.
If you HAD to, perhaps, but myself, if either came to pass I'd be wearing a red headband torn from cloth and carrying two large caliber carbines, bare-chested through the woods.
If you wish to speak to me you'd have to address me as "Rambo". I'll not answer to names like Ryan Seacrest.
Welcome to FR.
BTW, you're at the wrong site to offer any praise of the clintoons.
Went to the link and found another “Obama and your Mama”. A real kneeslapper.
I agree entirely with those observations. To say that Hillary is "far more qualified, more sober and more conservative than Obama" is by no means to speak glowingly of Hillary; it is merely to recognize that a President Obama would be a much scarier thought than a President Hillary Clinton.
My dislike for Hillary and her Power Couple partner is visceral, and it is deep. And although I have come to dislike Obama a bit in recent months also--it now appears that he is nowhere nearly so pure (albeit naive) as he once presented himself--this distaste cannot begin to compare with my unhappy feelings toward Hillary and her tomcat spouse. The very thought of those two returning to the White House, to sully the institution of the presidency once again, is utterly repellent to me.
That said, however, I do not believe Hillary would be nearly so innocent in her dealings with Ahmadinejad, Kim Jong-Il, Chavez, Medvedev, et al., as Obama would be. Of course, that is not a very high hurdle to clear.
In short, the Clintons (both of them) nauseate me. But Obama frightens me. And that is worse.
That was a rather snide remark to E the Wise. What was that supposed to mean?
That was a rather snide remark to E the Wise. What was that supposed to mean?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.