Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

UN chief: Saudi to boost oil production (again)
AP/Yahoo ^ | 6-15-08

Posted on 06/15/2008 4:05:28 PM PDT by STARWISE

Saudi Arabia plans to increase its oil production by 200,000 barrels a day next month, the kingdom's oil minister told U.N. chief Ban Ki-moon on Sunday, according to Ban's spokesman.

The U.N. secretary-general met with Oil Minister Ali al-Naimi in the port city of Jiddah during a one-day trip to the world's largest oil producer.

Farhan Haq, a spokesman who is traveling with Ban, said in an e-mail that the U.N. chief said al-Naimi told him Saudi Arabia would increase oil production by 200,000 barrels a day from June to July. In May, the kingdom increased its production by 300,000.

By July, production should be at 9.7 million barrels a day, Haq said.

Ban also said Saudi Arabia understands that the current price of oil, which topped $139 per barrel earlier this month, is not normal, according to the official Saudi Press Agency.

"The king believes that the current oil prices are abnormally high, and he is ready to restore prices to their appropriate levels," SPA quoted Ban as telling reporters in Jiddah.

(Excerpt) Read more at biz.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News
KEYWORDS: energy; oil; saudiarabia; un
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
"The king believes that the current oil prices are abnormally high, and he is ready to restore prices to their appropriate levels...."
1 posted on 06/15/2008 4:05:29 PM PDT by STARWISE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

“The king believes that the current oil prices are abnormally high, and he is ready to restore prices to their appropriate levels....”
::::::
Sounds like the normal tripe from a politician. I wonder what “appropriate levels” means?


2 posted on 06/15/2008 4:09:41 PM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

This is not much of an increase. Perhaps it is the best they can do.


3 posted on 06/15/2008 4:12:15 PM PDT by RightWhale (I will veto each and every beer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
The increase will all go to China...their infrastructure was decimated...and they will use lots and lots of petroleum based products for heavy machinery to move toppled buildings....they will use diesel for generators since the hydroelectric sources have been destroyed. DON'T kid yourselves...the increase is spoken for, by CHINA!
4 posted on 06/15/2008 4:19:30 PM PDT by antivenom (If you're not living on the edge, you're taking up too much damn space!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

Why don’t we increase our own production so we’re not at the mercy of people who don’t like us? I believe someone is paying our politicians to keep American oil in the ground. Maybe that will change when the bribes to drill are worth more than the bribes not to drill. Stupidity alone can’t explain all of the ridiculous decisions the politicians make.


5 posted on 06/15/2008 4:21:28 PM PDT by peeps36 (Politician = Corrupt Degenerate Loser = Ted, Nancy, Barry, Jack and Many More)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE
As crazy as it may sound.... I have long suspected that some in the anti-drilling, enviro-weenie crowd are in cahoots, at some level, with OPEC. Every time there is a marginal increase in OPEC production, it gives the anti-drillers more leeway to say "See, we don't need to drill [ANWR/GOM/continental shelf/Colorado/etc.], the Saudis will take care of us."

Okay, maybe that's crazy. But there have been stranger bedfellows in history.

6 posted on 06/15/2008 4:23:56 PM PDT by NewJerseyJoe (Rat mantra: "Facts are meaningless! You can use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: peeps36

USA domestic production is 12 million bpd low, that is how much is imported. Go ahead, increase domestic production from 8 million bpd to 11 million bpd. It will be very expensive and still be 9 million bpd short.


7 posted on 06/15/2008 4:25:11 PM PDT by RightWhale (I will veto each and every beer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

I have a better idea:

How about we drill for our own oil? Tomorrow. The environmental extremists and the Saudi’s like to play games.

See if they like this game. Wheel of Fortune.

Would they like to buy a vowel?

L_ck My H__ry B__nb_g.

“phrase”


8 posted on 06/15/2008 4:34:56 PM PDT by Eric Blair 2084 (Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms shouldn't be a federal agency...it should be a convenience store.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

The Dems (Obama) are on the wrong side of this. The US public wants us to start drilling.


9 posted on 06/15/2008 4:38:16 PM PDT by marajade (Yes, I'm a SW freak!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marajade

John McCain has voted repeatedly against drilling in ANWAR and in most offshore locations. Obama and McCain are not the best choices to solve this problem. Unlike Obama, McCain does favor building more nuclear plants, but that will take about 10 years to realize any power, even if we started tomorrow.


10 posted on 06/15/2008 4:52:03 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: kabar

McCain ought to get with the program. Drilling is the answer and the public will want it.


11 posted on 06/15/2008 5:01:08 PM PDT by marajade (Yes, I'm a SW freak!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

Read an article the other day indicating that since the oil shortage in the 80’s, US production has declined by 20% and US consumption has increased by 30%. Wrong direction here.

I recall mandatory 55 mph max nationwide. I have decided to reduce my own consumption when I can. By driving 55 instead of 70 I am saving 20% on my consumption. And, planning ahead, I am arriving not nearly as stressed.


12 posted on 06/15/2008 5:58:34 PM PDT by needtowakeup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
This is not much of an increase. Perhaps it is the best they can do.

If only we were doing the best we could do - instead we've set ANWR and offshore drilling off-limits for no good reason.
13 posted on 06/15/2008 6:06:10 PM PDT by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

I saw in another article that the Saudis want Europe to cut taxes. That should be fun.


14 posted on 06/15/2008 6:32:55 PM PDT by Right Wing Assault ("..this administration is planning a 'Right Wing Assault' on values and ideals.." - John Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marajade

This is the one issue which could save McCain and the republicans this fall.


15 posted on 06/15/2008 7:31:38 PM PDT by wendy1946
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: marajade; kabar; Eric Blair 2084

DRILL HERE, DRILL ... N O W !! SIGN AND PASS ON

http://www.americansolutions.com/actioncenter/petitions/?Guid=54ec6e43-75a8-445b-aa7b-346a1e096659


16 posted on 06/15/2008 7:57:15 PM PDT by STARWISE (They (Dims) think of this WOT as Bush's war, not America's war-RichardMiniter, respected OBL author)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale

Is the extra Saudi oil the light kind that everybody wants or is it the heavy, high-sulfur crude that’s harder to refine?


17 posted on 06/15/2008 8:00:52 PM PDT by Otho
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: needtowakeup
I recall mandatory 55 mph max nationwide. I have decided to reduce my own consumption when I can. By driving 55 instead of 70 I am saving 20% on my consumption. And, planning ahead, I am arriving not nearly as stressed.

The difference is you're doing it voluntarily as opposed to being ordered to do so by the government in the name of "conservation". Same thing as setting your thermostat to 78. You wanna do it? Have at it.

18 posted on 06/15/2008 9:48:49 PM PDT by VeniVidiVici (Be careful! Communist ideas may give you brain cancer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

Huh???
Wasn’t it just a week or so ago he was telling Bush “no”?


19 posted on 06/16/2008 6:57:50 AM PDT by jackv (DEMOCRATS HATE BUSH MORE THAN THEY LOVE THEIR COUNTRY!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: needtowakeup

Population of the US is also up that much. Headed for a billion.


20 posted on 06/16/2008 7:45:08 AM PDT by RightWhale (I will veto each and every beer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson