Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama calls for end to foreign oil dependence in 10 years
monstersandcritics.com ^ | August 4, 2008

Posted on 08/04/2008 9:59:08 PM PDT by Free ThinkerNY

Washington - Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama called on the United States to end its dependence on oil from the Middle East and Venezuela within 10 years as part of a broad speech laying out his energy plans on Monday.

Obama, who celebrated his 47th birthday Monday, said he would direct the 'full resources' of government towards promoting renewable energy sources, investing 150 billion dollars over the 10-year period.

'Breaking our oil addiction is one of the greatest challenges our generation will ever face. It's gonna take nothing less than a complete transformation of our economy,' Obama said in Michigan, home to the nation's largest automakers.

Obama challenged struggling automakers in the United States to retool towards more fuel-efficient cars in the face of surging petrol prices that have led to slumping sales of sports utility vehicles and pickup trucks.

General Motors Corp last week reported a 15.5-billion-dollar loss in the second quarter and a 27-per-cent drop in July auto sales on a year earlier.

Obama called for 150 million plug-in hybrid vehicles to hit the roads within six years, and said he would aim for 10 per cent of energy to come from renewable sources by the end of his first term.

US consumers have been reeling from an economic slowdown and rising petrol prices that have become a focal point of the election campaign between Obama and his Republican rival John McCain.

(Excerpt) Read more at monstersandcritics.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News
KEYWORDS: 2008; energy; energyindependence; energypolicy; issues; obama; oil
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-53 next last

1 posted on 08/04/2008 9:59:09 PM PDT by Free ThinkerNY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Hard to believe that a person could get that stupid in only 47 years.


2 posted on 08/04/2008 10:01:10 PM PDT by Graybeard58 (Perhaps I'll change my name to grayhusseinbeard58...or perhaps not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY
'Breaking our oil addiction is one of the greatest challenges our generation will ever face.

Every time I read this STUPUID ADDICTION LINE I get so friggn mad. I'm sick of it! We are no more addicted to oil than we are addicted to our own blood.. I'm going to go find something to kick!!

3 posted on 08/04/2008 10:02:05 PM PDT by chaos_5 (Some one needs to tell the "Mad Cow" to call the House back into session!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Pie in the sky BS from the shape shifter.


4 posted on 08/04/2008 10:02:09 PM PDT by headstamp 2 (Been here before)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

It’s amazing when your the Messiah that you can pull a miricle off in such a short time. 10 years is that two terms for the Messiah?


5 posted on 08/04/2008 10:03:10 PM PDT by ncfool (Barack show us the birth certificate. Obama the Manchurian Candidate .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58
Why should the government spend 150 billion when Toyota is already doing it!? Let the private sector do it, they can do it much cheaper, more efficient, and much quicker that the Obamas ever could, and Toyota is making money doing it!
6 posted on 08/04/2008 10:03:19 PM PDT by cardinal4 (Drill Now, Vote Nobama, and Oust the Third Word Democrat Congress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58
It's gonna take nothing less than a complete transformation of our economy

Kinda like the Great Depression was a complete transformation of our economy.

7 posted on 08/04/2008 10:03:46 PM PDT by dfwright (The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left (Eccl. 10:2, NIV))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: chaos_5

Don’t ‘kick’ something...instead find something to ‘cling’ too. In the ObamaNation my bitterness serves me well...


8 posted on 08/04/2008 10:04:09 PM PDT by PennsylvaniaMom (I am still bitter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY
Where's the moron think all that electricity is going to come from???

Or it in other words, this is all just a lie for public consumption that has no basis in reality. The only way to ween our selves off a significant amount of “fossil” fuel is nuclear. Is Obama going to promote the production of massive new nuclear power plants???

9 posted on 08/04/2008 10:04:24 PM PDT by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

We are “addicted” to oil because it is cheap and plentiful and will remain that way for quite some time.

“Sophisticated” talk of progressive “alternative” sources of energy is just another condescending, feel-good psychology of the left. It is fundamental in liberals’ nature to look down their nose at such things as patriotism, Christianity, heterosexual monogamy, profitable business and good old dirty petroleum.


10 posted on 08/04/2008 10:05:14 PM PDT by EyeGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

I have a way to avoid foreign oil. First, drill here. Second, conquer some oil producing states like Venezuela, Iraq, etc. Then we won’t be buying Foreign oil, it will all be American oil.


11 posted on 08/04/2008 10:08:07 PM PDT by FFranco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cardinal4

Why now, the government has to build the car to go nowhere!


12 posted on 08/04/2008 10:08:37 PM PDT by GregoryFul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

It will be nice when all we need is air to run our automobiles, planes, etc. etc. We are not there or anywhere near that so what happens when we are STILL needing oil 10 yrs. down the road? These people are the enemy. What a point this country has come to when these idiots even come close to the presidency, not to mention the incompetents in Congress.


13 posted on 08/04/2008 10:09:54 PM PDT by bushfamfan (America's sunrise has turned into a sunset.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Ummm... We use oil becauase that is the most efficient thing we have beside nuclear.

How is using crap that aint efficient, efficient?


14 posted on 08/04/2008 10:10:48 PM PDT by mylife (The Roar Of the Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

From Obama’s speech in Lansing, MI:

“But I know we can do this. We can do this because we are Americans. We do the improbable. We beat great odds. We rally together to meet whatever challenge stands in our way. That’s what we’ve always done – and it’s what we must do now. For the sake of our economy, our security, and the future of our planet, we must end the age of oil in our time.”

Obama wants to end the age of oil in our time.

Huh?


15 posted on 08/04/2008 10:12:49 PM PDT by bethtopaz (The U.S. Mail Service published Obama's resume on a new first class stamp.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY
Obama calls for end to foreign oil dependence in 10 years

Kindergartners call for brown cows that give chocolate milk in every school yard.

16 posted on 08/04/2008 10:13:36 PM PDT by Polybius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

here, call for American independance from foreign oil, maybe they’ll think you thought of it all by yerself.


17 posted on 08/04/2008 10:13:43 PM PDT by Waco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58
Obama is such a boob. It just goes to show you how a liberal can get away with such empty platitudes and not be questioned by the biased media as to how he intends to do accomplish this feat, besides forcing others to make it happen.
McCain could propose the same thing and the media would barrage him with questions as to how he intends to make it happen, and then print how they doubt it!
18 posted on 08/04/2008 10:13:45 PM PDT by jeffc (They're coming to take me away! Ha-ha, he-he, ho-ho!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY
LAST 100 DAYS VIDEO
 
A MUST SEE VIDEO! and MUST SHARE FAR AND WIDE!

 
 
 
19 posted on 08/04/2008 10:14:38 PM PDT by Wolverine (A Concerned Citizen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ncfool

Does that mean we are also going to have electric planes, trains, busses and 18 wheelers? Maybe we’ll all be flying coast to coast in a blimp? Nobody seems to recognize the fact that we use a lot of petroleum and its byproducts for lots of other things besides vehicles. Totally clueless!


20 posted on 08/04/2008 10:14:54 PM PDT by Grams A
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: chaos_5

This man is so empty, its makes my head spin. Time to inflate my tires.


21 posted on 08/04/2008 10:17:01 PM PDT by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Grams A

Can we run solar panel factory’s on solar power?

The answer is NO.

And to top that pipedream off we IMPORT 99% of the gallinium we use th manufacture solar panels


22 posted on 08/04/2008 10:19:40 PM PDT by mylife (The Roar Of the Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: dfwright

Or the kind of change that Lenin had in mind.


23 posted on 08/04/2008 10:20:58 PM PDT by maro (Repeal the 8th Amendment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: DB
The only way to ween our selves off a significant amount of “fossil” fuel is nuclear.

Yep, about 300 thousand megawatts of base load nuclear power -- or about 300 one thousand megawatt power plants -- to replace the present coal and gas fired capacity. The coal and gas then can go to liquification to make liquid fuels for transportation.

24 posted on 08/04/2008 10:21:59 PM PDT by Dagny&Hank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

This from the party that prohibits domestic drilling that would come online in under 10 years time.

Obama has played his hand. It isn’t that too much of our money goes overseas for oil. Or that “terrorist nations” get oil money. It is that “we” use too much of the “world’s” oil (that is currently offered for sale). That and “oil pollutes”.

So instead we go to food for oil. Grow our way to new energy resources. Or go electric without building new power plants (hey, you CAN’T just set your thermostat whatever you’d like, they don’t even HAVE AC in Europe).

It isn’t about something better. It is about making Americans “pay” for “injustices”. And that is plain antiAmericanism 101.


25 posted on 08/04/2008 10:22:43 PM PDT by weegee (Hi there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY
"Barack Obama called on the United States to end its dependence on oil from the Middle East and Venezuela within 10 years as part of a broad speech laying out his energy plans on Monday."

How will he do this? By taking more of your money in taxes, and at the same time deem all cars built before 2007 as environmentally unfit.At the same time, he will put a 50% "carbon tax" on all new vehicles sold.

Then you will not be able to afford to drive a car, which will translate to a vast reduction of foreign oil imports. Isn't Obama economics wonderfull? Oh, and screw all you auto workers who will be laid off. Obama says thanks for the campaign donations your union stole from your pay checks and gave to him.

26 posted on 08/04/2008 10:23:53 PM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jeffc
McCain could propose the same thing and the media would barrage him with questions as to how he intends to make it happen, and then print how they doubt it!

The sad part being I half expect McCrazy to say something equally stupid. We're so screwed.

27 posted on 08/04/2008 10:24:20 PM PDT by eclecticEel (men who believe deeply in something, even wrong, usually triumph over men who believe in nothing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Nathan Zachary

Green jobs


28 posted on 08/04/2008 10:24:54 PM PDT by mylife (The Roar Of the Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Waco

I have a better idea. Let’s end the importation of foreign water when we have good product here at home and overthrow the despots who are sitting on the world’s oil.

The oil isn’t evil, Chavez and the muslim extremists are.

It’s like continuing to do trade with Hitler or Stalin.


29 posted on 08/04/2008 10:24:56 PM PDT by weegee (Hi there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: weegee

Bingo


30 posted on 08/04/2008 10:26:32 PM PDT by mylife (The Roar Of the Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Grams A
Does that mean we are also going to have electric planes, trains, busses and 18 wheelers?

Buses definitely can be electric, because they are in all of Europe (and in a few places in the USA.)

Trains are often electric as well, it is a very good deal.

But forget about the other vehicles on your list, they don't have fixed routes. In Europe 18-wheelers are replaced by trains wherever possible. Airplanes will always require autonomous power plants, and batteries won't cut it.

Maybe we’ll all be flying coast to coast in a blimp?

As an entertainment maybe.

Nobody seems to recognize the fact that we use a lot of petroleum and its byproducts for lots of other things besides vehicles

It is not politically expedient to mention this dirty secret because politicians have no "solution" to this problem. It's much easier to pretend that plastics, fertilizers and all organic chemistry comes out of nowhere.

31 posted on 08/04/2008 10:26:58 PM PDT by Greysard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58
"Hard to believe that a person could get that stupid in only 47 years."

Wait till you see the next years graduating class of Marxists. They'll be dumb as Obama before age 20.

32 posted on 08/04/2008 10:29:34 PM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

I don’t know why he didn’t call on us to do so in one year, it’s equally fantastic.


33 posted on 08/04/2008 10:42:40 PM PDT by americanophile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

“Barack Obama called on the United States to end its dependence on oil from the Middle East and Venezuela within 10 years.”

Unless Obama plans on annexing Alberta and maybe the Norwegian coast, this ain’t gonna happen.


34 posted on 08/04/2008 10:50:58 PM PDT by DemforBush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Greysard

Better read your links more closely:

“In the United States it was estimated that it cost as much to electrify a railroad as it cost to build it in the first place. Overhead lines and third rails require greater clearances, and the right-of-way must be better separated to protect the public from electrocution, as well as from trains which approach much more quietly than diesels or steam.

For most large systems the cost of electrifying the whole system is impractical, and generally only some divisions are electrified. In the United States only certain dense urban areas and some mountainous areas were electrified, and the latter have all been discontinued. The junction between electrified and unelectrified territory is the locale of engine changes; for example, Amtrak trains had extended stops in New Haven, Connecticut as diesel and electric locomotives were swapped, a delay which contributed to the electrification of the remaining segment of the Northeast Corridor in 2000.[9]

In North America, the flexibility of diesel locomotives and the relative low cost of their infrastructure has led them to prevail except where legal or other operational constraints dictate the use of electricity. An example of the latter is the use of electric locomotives by AMTRAK and commuter railroads in The Northeast.”


35 posted on 08/04/2008 10:52:43 PM PDT by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58
Well, it's nice to know he's worked at something, I suppose.
36 posted on 08/04/2008 10:55:06 PM PDT by SAJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY
Obama, who celebrated his 47th birthday Monday, said he would direct the 'full resources' of government towards promoting renewable energy sources, investing 150 billion dollars over the 10-year period.

We send how many hundreds of billions of dollars every year to the middle east in return for oil, and he's gonna replace that with 150 billion over a ten year period?

And calling it an investment is laughable. When one "invests" one expects a return on that investment. Will we be getting that 150 billion back with interest? I hardly think so. Its gonna go bye bye.

37 posted on 08/04/2008 11:07:26 PM PDT by lowbridge ("I have never learned to fight for my freedom. I was only good at enjoying it" - Van Den Boogaard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoCal Pubbie
In the United States it was estimated that it cost as much to electrify a railroad as it cost to build it in the first place

Absolutely, this costs money. But it's also an investment into the future. It's up to the people to invest or not.

38 posted on 08/04/2008 11:25:56 PM PDT by Greysard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY
"...It's gonna take nothing less than a complete transformation of our economy."

Make no mistake. Mass Socialism, Marxist policies all the way across the board.

After all, it's for "Own Good"

Why Obama Is Losing and His Freefall In The Polls

 

 

 

39 posted on 08/04/2008 11:30:36 PM PDT by lmr (I am now a Youtube Partner-Don't worry, the gig doesn't pay much!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY
Obama called for 150 million plug-in hybrid vehicles to hit the roads within six years

If Obama had the most basic knowledge about the US auto industry, which needless to say he doesn't, he would know that putting 25 million new plug in hybrids on the road per year would require those hybrids to constitute about 150% - with the slower sales in the current down turn, perhaps 175% - of total sales.

40 posted on 08/05/2008 12:13:27 AM PDT by CGTRWK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lowbridge
And calling it an investment is laughable. When one "invests" one expects a return on that investment. Will we be getting that 150 billion back with interest? I hardly think so. Its gonna go bye bye.

The investment is fat federal grants to fellow libs in the universities and politically connected alternative energy companies.

The return is the campaign contributions and votes of the recipients.

In dollar terms that isn't a return at all, but that doesn't matter because the boy Marxist isn't investing a dime of his own money.

41 posted on 08/05/2008 12:16:48 AM PDT by CGTRWK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: chaos_5
Yes that OIL ADDICTION schtick really gets on my nerves.
42 posted on 08/05/2008 12:21:33 AM PDT by Rummyfan (Iraq: it's not about Iraq anymore, it's about the USA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY
Obama calls for end to foreign oil dependence in 10 years

Obama's fantasy fits in so well and has just about as much a chance of happening as some of my "other fantasies" as a child...

"You're skin, it's so soft, can I rub it with this jello?"

43 posted on 08/05/2008 2:42:46 AM PDT by Caipirabob (Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lmr

Fantastic Video! Thanks for posting. I was laughing for 5 minutes at the ending.


44 posted on 08/05/2008 2:43:43 AM PDT by Nipfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY
A lot of posters are wrong-footing themselves on this thread. Obama wants plug-in hybrids and more renewables? Well, he should. But this is low-hanging fruit. We're already doing this, driven partly by expensive oil and partly by current policy. Republicans should be taking credit and criticizing Obama for being late to the party. Instead, some folks seem eager to let the Empty Suit stake a claim to the Bush energy record.

Specifically: since 2000 the U.S. has quadrupled ethanol production. We'll double it again in the next two years. We're bringing cellulosic ethanol into production. Installed wind capacity in the U.S. has increased seven times and we've led the world in new installed capacity in each of the last three years. (China is now ramping up fast so I don't know how long that will last.) EIA reports that U.S. shipments of photovoltaic units is up more than tenfold. All this, again, is since 2000. This is a GOP/Bush success story which Obama is now trying to coopt.

None of this means we don't need to drill ANWR and the OCS, build more nuclear, build clean coal, develop tar sands and oil shale, etc. We need to do all the above. Obama doesn't understand or won't admit that, and this is where we need to hammer him. Renewables are not an excuse for opposing everything else.

But that said, renewables are (finally) going mainstream. Corn ethanol is already cost competitive with oil. Wind is close. Solar is still pricey but costs continue to decline while the cost of conventional energy continues to increase. I fully expect the lines to cross within the next decade. We'll still be dominated by coal, oil, natural gas, and nuclear 30 years from now, but renewables will continue to capture market share. Given the record of the Bush Administration, the GOP can legitimately stake a claim to this, so I don't see why so many people want to concede the issue to the dems.

I want a plug-in hybrid myself. I like the sound of 150 miles per gallon gasoline equivalent, I have a garage where I can plug in, and I'm willing to build the nuclear power plants to generate the electricity. The numbers Obama is throwing around are nonsense -- plug-in's can't be introduced that fast -- but the rate of adoption will be rapid nonetheless. They will be commonplace in the next decade. The public needs to understand that all the heavy lifting has already been done; the next President, whoever he is, is not entitled to take the credit.

45 posted on 08/05/2008 3:06:47 AM PDT by sphinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

How do you do that without drilling your own?


46 posted on 08/05/2008 3:15:47 AM PDT by Ben Reyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Is Lord Obomba promising to put an end to the environmentalist obstructionism that is preventing the construction of new nuke plants?

Didn’t think so.


47 posted on 08/05/2008 3:21:39 AM PDT by Fresh Wind (Five Year Plans and New Deals, wrapped in golden chains...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY
'Breaking our oil addiction is one of the greatest challenges our generation will ever face. It's gonna take nothing less than a complete transformation of our economy

Read: "I'm gonna turn the clock back 100 years and y'all better learn to live with it and furthermore, I will do everything within my power to tear down this great republic and make it into a 3rd world craphole which will be responsible to the UN and make it feasible to be destroyed by outside forces who hate us and our free, capitalist, world-protecting, existence."

48 posted on 08/05/2008 4:13:23 AM PDT by Conservative Vermont Vet ((One of ONLY 37 Conservatives in the People's Republic of Vermont. Socialists and Progressives All))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chaos_5
Every time I read this STUPUID ADDICTION LINE I get so friggn mad. I'm sick of it! We are no more addicted to oil than we are addicted to our own blood.. I'm going to go find something to kick!!

I can't be certain who coined this ludicrous bête noire (for you libtard lurkers, that is "something that is particularly disliked or that is to be avoided:) but the first time I heard it was during Jorge's State of the Union address.

Thank, W. Whether he was the first to use this or not, he certainly didn't help "the cause"!!!

49 posted on 08/05/2008 4:19:34 AM PDT by Conservative Vermont Vet ((One of ONLY 37 Conservatives in the People's Republic of Vermont. Socialists and Progressives All))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58
The Messiah may be trying to emulate Hoover's 1928 campaign but with a twist: "Arugala in every pot and a Hybrid in every garage."
50 posted on 08/05/2008 4:25:45 AM PDT by Conservative Vermont Vet ((One of ONLY 37 Conservatives in the People's Republic of Vermont. Socialists and Progressives All))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson