Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Edwards's Ex-Mistress Will Not Pursue Paternity Test
Washington Post ^ | 8/09/08 | Lois Romano and Howard Kurtz

Posted on 08/09/2008 3:31:12 PM PDT by advance_copy

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-159 next last
To: Dog Gone

“The bad thing is that the MSM has now forced us to buy the National Enquirer to get any real news.”

That is a startling development.


81 posted on 08/09/2008 4:17:51 PM PDT by Canedawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: advance_copy

This is the proof positive that Edwards is the father. Edwards’ agreement to a paternity test, and Hunter’s refusal, is all part of Edwards’ cover-up scheme, and the money he’s paying her.

FOLLOW THE MONEY . . .

The money paid to hunter, both currently and in 2006 to make the alleged campaing videos, . . . If Edwards paid her campaign money in ‘06 to keep quiet or just as his girlfriend - without her actually performing valid services for the campaing, is a fraudulent use of campaign funds....

And if he’s currently using any campaign-related funds to pay her off . . .

HOO BOY!!!


82 posted on 08/09/2008 4:18:27 PM PDT by seanrobins (blog.seanrobins.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

A paternity test doesn’t prove one is the father. It only eliminates some guy could be the father. “”

Geeeezz- When I hear “to a certainty of 99.999999%, that is good enough for me”


83 posted on 08/09/2008 4:19:07 PM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: advance_copy

The fish smell keeps getting worse.


84 posted on 08/09/2008 4:19:22 PM PDT by Kleebo151
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Canedawg

>>>“The bad thing is that the MSM has now forced us to buy the National Enquirer to get any real news.”

The National Enquirer has ALWAYS been money better spent that the MSM...

Anyone he prefer to buy the NY or LA Times than the Enquirer?


85 posted on 08/09/2008 4:19:52 PM PDT by seanrobins (blog.seanrobins.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

No they don’t. Sometimes there are multiple possibilities.


86 posted on 08/09/2008 4:19:54 PM PDT by nobama08
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: ridesthemiles
$15,000 a month in illegal “salary” a month from Edwards. The slut is worth every penny! Edwards is definitely getting his money’s worth.” Soooo—what is showing up on her tax return? “Child Support”?? Extortion payments?? How does this show up on a w-2 or a 1099??

It is felony federal tax fraud to do what Edwards did. The 2007 returns are already submitted. "Enquirer"ing minds want to know!

87 posted on 08/09/2008 4:20:01 PM PDT by FormerACLUmember (When the past no longer illuminates the future, the spirit walks in darkness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: ChocChipCookie

If the cash spigot ever slows down, I’ll bet she changes her mind.”

If she or the kid ever need public “assistance”, doesn’t the state have a right to know who the father is so they can bill him for srvices???


88 posted on 08/09/2008 4:20:25 PM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

>>>A paternity test doesn’t prove one is the father. It only eliminates some guy could be the father. Only the mother really knows which man she slept with the longest.

You’re wrong...

If Edwards likelihood is 99.9999999% then a test is done on this Young character, and it is 0.000000%,, there is no doubt...


89 posted on 08/09/2008 4:21:22 PM PDT by seanrobins (blog.seanrobins.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego
I think she knows who the daddy is. And I think she knows for sure if it’s physically possible or not that Edwards is the one.

From H&C last night the editor of NE claims that their source apparently told them that she did not have sexual relations with the guy claiming to be the father.

Seems to me the only person who would know that for sure is her.

90 posted on 08/09/2008 4:22:35 PM PDT by mware (F-R-E-E. That spells free. freerepublic.com baby)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: advance_copy

LOL!

- staight out of the bill clinton/Gennifer Flowers denial tactics book...


91 posted on 08/09/2008 4:23:34 PM PDT by Wil H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Revolting cat!

I like the way you think!


92 posted on 08/09/2008 4:23:49 PM PDT by Wally_Kalbacken
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Gondring

>> Considering this woman’s history, Edwards needs to.

> What do you know about her history?

“John Edwards’ former babe inspired lusty, party-girl character in novel”
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2059201/posts


93 posted on 08/09/2008 4:23:50 PM PDT by Boundless (Legacy Media is hazardous to your mental health)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: advance_copy

Ever since the MSM woke up to this little dalliance we can’t seem to get away from it; at the beginning I was very reluctant to believe that we had the whole story but maybe this ‘love child’ is the result of Edwards’ stiff member, after all.


94 posted on 08/09/2008 4:25:17 PM PDT by Old Professer (The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ZOOKER
Should she drag him into court, the payments stop.

They might stop temporarily.And if he isn't,in fact,they could stop permanently.But if he is the daddy the payments would,at worst,stop only for a while.And then,given his breathtaking wealth,the payments would resume and continue at least for 18...and more likely...for 22 years.And the payments would likely be enormous....far more than $15K/month.

Edwards knows a lot of lawyer tricks, and with a bevy of sympathetic judges could delay any further payment for decades.

I wouldn't bet on that.Any judge who agreed to play footsie with him would open him/herself up to searing scrutiny,loss of judgeship and maybe even criminal charges.

95 posted on 08/09/2008 4:26:42 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Obama:"Ich bein ein beginner")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: advance_copy

Why no ‘waving a hundred dollar bill in a trailer park’ comments from Carville?


96 posted on 08/09/2008 4:27:57 PM PDT by stockstrader (CHANGE--a euphemism for further dividing our country along racial, social and economic lines)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: imintrouble
Lord how many possibles does the woman think there are for fatherhood????

She DID leave the birth certificate blank where it asks for the father.

97 posted on 08/09/2008 4:29:24 PM PDT by stockstrader (CHANGE--a euphemism for further dividing our country along racial, social and economic lines)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: mware

True enough. She knows who the father is, and/or knows who the “suspects” are if she wants to establish paternity. She could also firmly confirm that Edwards was not the father, if she wanted to confirm that piece of the story. She could confirm he’s not dad and still leave the other questions unanswered if she wanted to.

This whole case smells bad to me.


98 posted on 08/09/2008 4:30:09 PM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: stockstrader

Ya where is Carville, haven’t seen him recently.

Carville looks like a human bowling ball.


99 posted on 08/09/2008 4:31:26 PM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: advance_copy
GUILTY!
100 posted on 08/09/2008 4:39:34 PM PDT by Coffee200am ("We should all be living in mud huts and riding bicycles to avoid killing the polar bears...%99"/s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141-159 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson