Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: maccaca
I just saw a wacked out leftist comment on a Washington Post blog claim that the baby isn't her's. That her 16 year old daughter disappeared for some time!

Slime!!!

8 posted on 08/29/2008 9:18:27 PM PDT by B2orNotB2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: B2orNotB2
I just saw a wacked out leftist comment on a Washington Post blog claim that the baby isn't her's. That her 16 year old daughter disappeared for some time! Slime!!!

Well....statistically... Down's babies are more likely to be born to mothers over 31.....so the blogger is apparently showing his/her ignorance anyway. Don't lower your IQ by reading their trash! *chuckle*

54 posted on 08/29/2008 9:52:27 PM PDT by LaineyDee (Don't mess with Texas wimmen!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: B2orNotB2
They knew in advance little Trig would have Down syndrome. It is highly unlikely a 16-year-old girl would have undergone amniocentesis. It is almost certain a pregnant 44-year-old Sarah Palin would be tested.

Even if it were true, the mom would be covering so the daughter would not have to be "punished" for her mistake, right? I thought that was laudable to the Obama-ites. Or is it only laudable for a teen mother to stay young and carefree when the result is a dead baby?

81 posted on 08/30/2008 1:09:52 AM PDT by informavoracious (Sarah Palin: Reagan-in-a-Skirt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson