A woman — but why this woman? [Sarah Palin]

The Baltimore Sun ^ | 1 Sep 2008 | Susan Reimer

[Reily]

Also as editor didn't Obama set a record on the fewest publications for Harvard Law Review editor. (Like 1 or 0 papers !)
Also while a “Constitutional law Professor” he couldn't be bothered with publishing scholarly papers there either! (Two autobiographies do not count as scholarly publications !)

[Albion Wilde]

Comments are up to #702 now. To wit: SUSAN-YOU HAVE DONE MORE FOR THE REPUBLICANS THEN YOU CAN IMAGINE. ...

LOL!! Here's # 791:

"Piling on ... Susan, your uninteresting navel-gazings have killed far, far too many trees. Now, your low opinion of a real woman like Sarah Palin reveals that you are a waste of DNA as well. Get thee to a nunnery and learn some compassion, humility or even plain ol' common sense. And please, do it in silence."

[maica]

LOL! That poster really has a way with words!

[Jimmy Valentine]

Never thought of that!You have to be right! LOL

[Albion Wilde]

The comments section now has well over 4,000, and they keep coming at a rapid pace from all over the country. It seems that Drudge posted a link. As of 1750, they are still running 95% in favor of Palin.

[Freee-dame]

another nail in the coffin of the Baltimore Sun.

I just got an offer in the mail from the B-Sun for one year of the paper on Saturday and Sunday for ONE CENT. I guess they could then count me as a paid subscriber. I don't want the trash (figuratively and literally) in my home.