Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BREAKING: PALIN ADMITS HER 17-YEAR-OLD DAUGHTER IS PREGNANT.
The New York Post ^ | 9-1-08

Posted on 09/01/2008 9:05:11 AM PDT by WackySam

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 2,981-3,0003,001-3,0203,021-3,0403,041-3,051 next last
To: pissant

I’ll assume that you’re a voice of this internet only political party you’re advertising for, and that it takes great joy in unwanted pregnancies within families of their political opponents.


3,021 posted on 09/03/2008 9:44:59 AM PDT by death2tyrants
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: death2tyrants

You can assume that I can’t stand McCain. You can assume I’m not voting for him. You can assume I think Palin was a marginal pick, though I think she has a bright future. And you can assume I won’t ever vote for a candidate that believes in the fairy tale called global warming or believes in granting Amnesty to millions of invaders. In other words, I’m a conservative, not a GOP cheerleader.


3,022 posted on 09/03/2008 9:50:17 AM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3021 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
(OLD REGGIE) "Pope Paul VI said contraceptives should be illegal?"

PROVE IT.

I assume you know "Unlawful" is a synonym for "Illegal". Further, I assume you have no difficulty with understanding plain English.

HUMANE VITAE

Unlawful Birth Control Methods

Similarly excluded is any action which either before, at the moment of, or after sexual intercourse, is specifically intended to prevent procreation—whether as an end or as a means. (16)

3,023 posted on 09/03/2008 9:51:27 AM PDT by OLD REGGIE (I am most likely a Biblical Unitarian? Let me b e perfectly clear. I know nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2987 | View Replies]

To: OLD REGGIE
Humanae Vitae is a discussion of moral law. Your quote is Paul VI's statement about what IS morally unlawful, not what should be civilly illegal.

Further, I assume you have no difficulty with understanding plain English.

Given your post, I assume you do.

3,024 posted on 09/03/2008 9:56:05 AM PDT by Petronski (The Vice Presidency is below Sarah Palin's paygrade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3023 | View Replies]

To: pissant

I’ll also assume that you’re a voice of this internet only political party you’re advertising for, and that it takes great joy in unwanted pregnancies within families of their political opponents.


3,025 posted on 09/03/2008 9:59:55 AM PDT by death2tyrants
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3022 | View Replies]

To: death2tyrants

I take no joy or sorrow regarding Palin being an expectant grandma. And I don’t think FALCON is going to stake out a position on politicians’ family affairs. But shoot them an email and ask them if you want to know.


3,026 posted on 09/03/2008 10:10:11 AM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3025 | View Replies]

To: pissant

“I take no joy or sorrow...”

See post 4.


3,027 posted on 09/03/2008 11:23:29 AM PDT by death2tyrants
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3026 | View Replies]

To: death2tyrants

I don’t need to “see” it. I wrote it.


3,028 posted on 09/03/2008 11:34:46 AM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3027 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
Given your post, I assume you do.

Given your post, I know you are more interested in doubletalk than truth.

Carry on!

3,029 posted on 09/03/2008 1:51:29 PM PDT by OLD REGGIE (I am most likely a Biblical Unitarian? Let me b e perfectly clear. I know nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3024 | View Replies]

To: OLD REGGIE
I know you are more interested in doubletalk than truth.

You have proved once again the truth of your tagline (or at least the last three words).

3,030 posted on 09/03/2008 2:15:49 PM PDT by Petronski (The Vice Presidency is below Sarah Palin's paygrade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3029 | View Replies]

Comment #3,031 Removed by Moderator

To: OLD REGGIE; Religion Moderator
Personal attacks in taglines used to be verboten around here.

The best evidence of winning an argument is when the other guy resorts to gross ad hominem attacks.

3,032 posted on 09/03/2008 2:32:27 PM PDT by Petronski (The Vice Presidency is below Sarah Palin's paygrade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3031 | View Replies]

To: top 2 toe red

We don’t advise adoptions, we are an adoption agency, so anyone who walks in the door has already pretty much made up their mind.

We are simply facilitators to get birth parents and adoptive parents together.


3,033 posted on 09/03/2008 4:33:40 PM PDT by pa mom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3013 | View Replies]

To: HungarianGypsy

Of course, and certainly with the publicity here, adoption really wouldn’t be an option.


3,034 posted on 09/03/2008 4:34:49 PM PDT by pa mom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3003 | View Replies]

To: WackySam

I was just questioning the word sickening. While I don’t agree with single parenthood, I don’t think it’s “sickening”. The word seemed a bit out of place, IMO.


3,035 posted on 09/03/2008 4:35:55 PM PDT by pa mom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2999 | View Replies]

To: christianhomeschoolmommaof3

I don’t think anyone here is talking forced adoption.

I was stating my opinion, and seeking to understand a certain resistance to adoption. I have heard that anger and suspicion before and I truly want to understand. I was hoping someone here could help.


3,036 posted on 09/03/2008 4:38:28 PM PDT by pa mom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3015 | View Replies]

To: beckysueb

Oh yes she did need the baby’s father’s signature to put the baby up for adoption in WA state. I know because I didn’t believe it when she told me, so I made the phone call for her. No father’s signature, no adoption, that’s what I was told.


3,037 posted on 09/03/2008 4:52:22 PM PDT by Eva (CHANGE- the post modern euphemism for Marxist revolution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2917 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
Have it your way. I must have been in error in claiming Pope Paul VI thought birth control should be illegal.

In fact I imagine he approved of birth control and was in favor of it being a legal right everywhere.

What else could be more plain?

Unlawful Birth Control Methods

Similarly excluded is any action which either before, at the moment of, or after sexual intercourse, is specifically intended to prevent procreation—whether as an end or as a means. (16)


He was just kidding wasn't he?

3,038 posted on 09/04/2008 8:52:06 AM PDT by OLD REGGIE (I am a Biblical Unitarian?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3032 | View Replies]

To: pa mom
I was just questioning the word sickening. While I don’t agree with single parenthood, I don’t think it’s “sickening”. The word seemed a bit out of place, IMO.

Go back and read my post- I never said single parenthood is "sickening".
3,039 posted on 09/04/2008 9:04:37 AM PDT by WackySam (The Constitution is not an a la carte menu.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3035 | View Replies]

To: OLD REGGIE
Watch the tense of the verb. Specifically excluded is... Since he is saying they are--present-tense--unlawful, he cannot be referring to civil law, since such laws (in the U.S. for instance) do not exist.

Further, the passage you're quoting comes after, and in the context of, moral law. You're quoting paragraph 14. Paragraphs 1-13 set forth a discussion about moral law.

Those paragraphs of Humanae Vitae are NOT a discussion of what civil law SHOULD BE, but rather an exposition of how we discern what God's moral law IS.

3,040 posted on 09/04/2008 9:06:03 AM PDT by Petronski (Zero-bama. All this time we thought it was an "O" but, nope, it's just a "0".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3038 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 2,981-3,0003,001-3,0203,021-3,0403,041-3,051 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson