Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sarah Palinís Yahoo account hijacked, e-mails posted online
ZDNet ^ | 9/17/2008 | Ryan Naraine

Posted on 09/17/2008 11:15:26 AM PDT by Domandred

Mod note: Do no post any screenshots of Governor Palin's Yahoo account on Free Republic.
Thank you.

On the heels of media reports that Republican vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin was using a private Yahoo e-mail account (gov.palin@yahoo.com) to conduct Alaska state business, hackers have broken into the account and posted evidence of the hijack on Wikileaks.

An activist group calling itself ‘anonymous’ claimed responsibility for the compromise and released screenshots, photographs and the e-mail addresses of several people close to Palin, including her husband Todd and assistant Ivy Frye.

(Excerpt) Read more at blogs.zdnet.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: creeps; democraticslimebags; hacked; hackergate; leftys; leftyscumbags; mccainpalin; palin; palinattacks; palinping; tasteless; wikileaks; yahoo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-50 ... 201-250251-300301-350 ... 401-416 next last
To: Philly Nomad
Quote:
"And to think FR thinks she’d make a great VP."

I don't think she will - I KNOW she will.
251 posted on 09/17/2008 4:55:57 PM PDT by Verbosus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies]

To: truthandlife

Yahoo! Inc.
Customer Care - Privacy Policy Issues
701 First Avenue
Sunnyvale, CA 94089
(408) 349-5070

Dial “O” to get a human being.


252 posted on 09/17/2008 4:58:17 PM PDT by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 236 | View Replies]

To: BGHater

They bitch if she uses government email to send personal emails and they bitch if she has a personal account to send personal emails. There is no making liberals happy.


253 posted on 09/17/2008 4:58:55 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (G-d is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Genoa
IMO, this will get her a LOT of sympathy from anyone who wouldn’t want their own email hacked.

Any time 'they' attack her, it backfires. She has nothing to be attacked for, except for being conservative and a common citizens, unlike the DC elites. She appeals to more Americans than the empty suits on the other side. (Not to mention the mysteriously missing suit, Biden.)
254 posted on 09/17/2008 4:58:57 PM PDT by CottonBall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Philly Nomad
And to think FR thinks she’d make a great VP.

Yes, she makes a great VP!

The left has gone off the deep end to just plain evil.

255 posted on 09/17/2008 4:59:06 PM PDT by Lady Heron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Brightside

I wish he would have caught them and held them at gunpoint until the police arrived. They would find out real quick where he stood on the 2A.


256 posted on 09/17/2008 5:00:25 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (G-d is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe

thanks for the number


257 posted on 09/17/2008 5:04:43 PM PDT by truthandlife ("Some trust in chariots and some in horses, but we trust in the name of the LORD our God." (Ps 20:7))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 252 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

The problem was conducting government business through a Yahoo! account.


258 posted on 09/17/2008 5:10:25 PM PDT by Gondring (I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies]

To: Red in Blue PA

I don’t think Obama has condemned the hacking of Palin’s emails. I doubt if he will.


259 posted on 09/17/2008 5:16:46 PM PDT by mombi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: FLDemocracker

Welcome to FR !


260 posted on 09/17/2008 5:17:39 PM PDT by tomkat (American craftsman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies]

To: Puddleglum

No. There used to be a time when conservatives had standards, sadly that’s been thrown out the window to satisfy the McCain machine. McCain wins the GOP nomination with 30% of the vote and FR falls right in line.

This wasn’t a case of Sarah Palin being the victim. She took unnecessary stupid risks with official Alaska business. What if instead of loony left “hackers” got into her account, terrorists got into it? How many state secrets could they have had access to? Especially with a quick request for sensitive information.

Look at it this way, you read in the newspaper that somebody was robbed in a bad section of town, and the thieves got away with $500,000 in cash. You feel sorry for the victim, but you have to question the victim’s judgment for walking around unprotected with that much cash. If something is important to you, you don’t take those risks.


261 posted on 09/17/2008 5:17:45 PM PDT by Philly Nomad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies]

To: Red in Blue PA

Didn’t you also hear that Obama’s account was hacked too. TheMessiah08@yahoo.com. They found no emails. The hackers also tried feverishly to find some of his accomplishments... unfortunately there are none.


262 posted on 09/17/2008 5:18:28 PM PDT by treadstone801
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: All

4chan.org is responsible for this. Simple as that. Call your congress person and get this cess poll of a website taken down.


263 posted on 09/17/2008 5:18:50 PM PDT by bubbrubb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies]

To: Red in Blue PA; All
Here's a BIG update, folks!

The story behind the Palin e-mail hacking (Uncovered: who was responsible-graphic language warning)

264 posted on 09/17/2008 5:19:05 PM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner (Sarah Palin is a smart missile aimed at the heart of the left!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Gondring

The problem is someone hacked her account...that is like opening someone’s mailbox and rummaging through their mail. It is illegal.


265 posted on 09/17/2008 7:52:12 PM PDT by Blue Turtle (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 258 | View Replies]

To: bubbrubb

Has the Obama campaign issued a stern condemnation of this violation of federal law? Have they called for an investigation? I’m hearing STUNNING silence from the Obama campaign.


266 posted on 09/17/2008 7:52:33 PM PDT by wpa_mikeb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 263 | View Replies]

To: Gondring

what business was she conducting, exactly?

Exactly. None.

What happened here was a violation of federal law.

Period.


267 posted on 09/17/2008 7:56:37 PM PDT by wpa_mikeb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 258 | View Replies]

To: Philly Nomad

Please describe the “business” she was conducting.

Exactly. You can’t.


268 posted on 09/17/2008 7:58:31 PM PDT by wpa_mikeb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 261 | View Replies]

To: Blue Turtle
Greta was all over this story tonight.

She is firmly behind Sarah.

The liberals on the panel started to insinuate that Sarah MAY have used her personal account for government business.

There was no evidence of such, but they still said it was possible.

You could tell she was ticked off, and mentioned that there is a presumption of innocents, and the actual crime was committed AGAINST Sarah.

Greta also stated that if they find the person/persons responsible it can get the person 5 years in prison(state law) and 1-2 years for federal offenses.

269 posted on 09/17/2008 7:59:53 PM PDT by mware (F-R-E-E, that spells free. FReerepublic,com baby)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 265 | View Replies]

To: Verbosus
Greta had a poll on the publics view of the hack of sarahs email.

Over 60% said it was a harmless prank.

Someone got back to her and told her that within 5 minutes over 2000 votes were registered.

She said that it seems some DUance has hacked the poll.

270 posted on 09/17/2008 8:03:15 PM PDT by mware (F-R-E-E, that spells free. FReerepublic,com baby)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies]

To: mware

It’s always the seriousness of the charge with liberals, isn’t it? They claim that she “may” have used it for govt purposes in the future, that’s good enough for them. BS

Her email was hacked. It’s a federal crime. She used that email, apparently, for personal use, NOT business, even though some are already telling the falsehood that she DID use it for official business. She didn’t.


271 posted on 09/17/2008 8:04:22 PM PDT by wpa_mikeb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 269 | View Replies]

To: mware

Yes, I was pretty outraged that her panel implied the hacking was justified because she MIGHT have sent govt. related emails. They totally missed the point. It’s a scary implication for all of us.


272 posted on 09/17/2008 8:04:27 PM PDT by Canticle_of_Deborah (Repentance is a contract with God for a second life - St. John Climacus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 269 | View Replies]

To: mware

I tried to vote in Greta’s poll and couldn’t. Something weird was going on.

The question was poorly worded. If it was a prank it was not harmless.


273 posted on 09/17/2008 8:06:21 PM PDT by Canticle_of_Deborah (Repentance is a contract with God for a second life - St. John Climacus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 270 | View Replies]

To: wpa_mikeb
I was curious about what is permitted and not permitted on personal email.

I found this comment very interesting from aol.

Anonymous may be unaware, but elected officials not only may use private email addresses to correspond with other public officials, they actually must if it is material deemed not appropriate. For example, if Nancy Pelosi wanted to send the latest Michael Moore video to Howard Dean, she'd have to use her yahoo email address to do it, not her house email. So a bunch of addresses of people like Arnold Schwarzenegger showing on the list is evidence of nil.

274 posted on 09/17/2008 8:08:14 PM PDT by mware (F-R-E-E, that spells free. FReerepublic,com baby)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 271 | View Replies]

To: mware

I voted early in the program and the results showed 97% selected ‘political dirty trick’.


275 posted on 09/17/2008 8:10:54 PM PDT by Gene Eric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 270 | View Replies]

To: Gene Eric

Greta’s tech person, known they had been hacked or as we here say FReeped from the left. I found it interesting that she said some dummy had hacked them. I wonder if she meant DUmmy????


276 posted on 09/17/2008 8:15:10 PM PDT by mware (F-R-E-E, that spells free. FReerepublic,com baby)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 275 | View Replies]

To: Canticle_of_Deborah

Yes that Gloria Alridge queen b - it was the only thing she was obsessing over. Not over who was victimized but whether Palin had been using the email account for nefarious government purposes. To hide something. Obamabot.


277 posted on 09/17/2008 8:16:36 PM PDT by Lent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 272 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner

Thanks for the link to the update! It’s excellent. This guy must be messing his pants about now.

It’s been killing me having FR down for the last couple of hours.


278 posted on 09/17/2008 8:18:05 PM PDT by mmichaels1970 (Stand up for CHUCK!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 264 | View Replies]

Comment #279 Removed by Moderator

To: bubbrubb

“4chan.org is responsible for this.”

I’d guess someone in the O campaign, and /b/tards will take the fall for it.


280 posted on 09/17/2008 8:19:19 PM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 263 | View Replies]

To: mware

interesting


281 posted on 09/17/2008 8:20:53 PM PDT by inottawa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 276 | View Replies]

To: GeeMoney
The Secret Service and the FBI are both investigating.

Greta said that if the crime was committed in Alaska it could get them 5 years in prison. Federal time could be 1-2 years.

282 posted on 09/17/2008 8:21:57 PM PDT by mware (F-R-E-E, that spells free. FReerepublic,com baby)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 279 | View Replies]

To: wpa_mikeb

They have to try and deflect this because they know it could turn out very bad.

BOR said tonight he is going to push the hell out of this thing.


283 posted on 09/17/2008 8:23:08 PM PDT by redk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 271 | View Replies]

To: DouglasKC
I'm betting this is a fake account created by the Obamites for propaganda purposes.

Still taking bets?

284 posted on 09/17/2008 8:23:55 PM PDT by Gondring (I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: mware

Who needs the FBI when you got bloggers

Just a theory

http://acanadianguy.blogspot.com/2008/09/who-is-palins-hacker.html


285 posted on 09/17/2008 8:24:11 PM PDT by inottawa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 282 | View Replies]

To: DBrow

According to posts on Michelle Malkin’s site, an unknown hacker FED it to the 4chan gremlins. One of them had a conscience and notified a friend of Sarah’s before more damage was done.


286 posted on 09/17/2008 8:24:59 PM PDT by Canticle_of_Deborah (Repentance is a contract with God for a second life - St. John Climacus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 280 | View Replies]

To: redk

I hope Greta will too. She seemed upset. She understands that none of us are safe.


287 posted on 09/17/2008 8:26:06 PM PDT by Canticle_of_Deborah (Repentance is a contract with God for a second life - St. John Climacus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 283 | View Replies]

To: CottonBall

Ok. First, if it’s not already been done, I think everyone should read Malkin’s latest blog posting on what happened here. It explains the hack itself, as well as how the account was “deleted” (hint: it wasn’t; it was closed because of the number of hackers who tried to get into it):

http://michellemalkin.com/2008/09/17/the-story-behind-the-palin-e-mail-hacking/

Note, in particular, how the hacker himself is exasperated at the fact that there’s “no there there,” as one might say.

That out of the way, let me explain the issue here. Most people (even here) seem to have forgotten one of the early smears against Palin was that, as mayor, she did get into a minor bit of trouble when she used her official e-mail account to do political mailings. All of the emails that were on the Yahoo account are *political* in nature, not governmental. That is, there is thus far no evidence that she used her Yahoo account for governmental or “official” business. In other words, she was using a private account for exactly the right reasons. Now, one may question the wisdom of using a Yahoo account, but so far, there is nothing (nada, zip, zilch) in these emails that in any way, shape, or form incriminates her. It’s a non-story (I am not going to discuss the criminal nature of the hacking itself, which is a big story).

I am a practicing attorney; I have been to numerous seminars regarding the use of electronic documents, and the danger of using email. Rule Number One, by every single attorney who deals in this area—never use email if you can help it. In other words, we are expressly instructed NOT to use email for matters that require any semblance of confidentiality for the simple fact that emails are “discoverable”. To avoid using official email for business is not “trying to hide” something—it is prudent and exactly what one is supposed to do. It is what every single government attorney, for example, is expressly told to do—don’t use official email for anything that should not be discovered in litigation. That’s not hiding something, that’s doing what anyone with any brains would do.

I cannot express in words how angry I am at the posters on the other sites who are completely side-stepping the real issues here (illegal hacking, no incriminating documents, etc.) and are, instead, now making the story about how Palin was somehow “stupid” to use a private account. She is doing exactly what she should do, short of avoiding email altogether (which is what I do—I talk to my clients via my own personal cell phone).


288 posted on 09/17/2008 8:26:54 PM PDT by Ilya Mourometz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 247 | View Replies]

To: Protect the Bill of Rights

Catching up on this ... dirty MF’s!

Thanks for the ping, GF!


289 posted on 09/17/2008 8:27:51 PM PDT by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 237 | View Replies]

To: inottawa

excerpted from your link -


Could our hacker be this rubico10 — 20 years old from Memphis, Tennessee?

Does he like chess? Did he leave his real name on his dead blog?

Just a theory? But how many people use the name rubico10?

UPDATE: Someone at Michelle Malkin’s comments notes that someone with the same name as the chess playing rubico10 has a father who is a state Democrat legislator ... coincidence.


!!!!!!!!!!!


290 posted on 09/17/2008 8:27:59 PM PDT by Canticle_of_Deborah (Repentance is a contract with God for a second life - St. John Climacus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 285 | View Replies]

To: Philly Nomad
Save the drama.

Nothing is safe.

Nothing.

Proof is in the reported hacking of numerous US government sites, denial of service attacks, loss/misplacement of US government and state government laptops, hard drives and electronic materials over the past couple decades.

No electronic system is 100% safe. Never has and never will be. The scum of the Earth will always find ways to break the law.

291 posted on 09/17/2008 8:28:15 PM PDT by Thumper1960 (A modern so-called "Conservative" is a shadow of a wisp of a vertebrate human being.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 261 | View Replies]

To: inottawa

Very, very interesting.........


292 posted on 09/17/2008 8:30:17 PM PDT by wpa_mikeb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 285 | View Replies]

To: Red in Blue PA

This from the same group that released her home phone number and social security number. Not surprising.


293 posted on 09/17/2008 8:33:59 PM PDT by SideoutFred (B.O. Stinks...it really does)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GeeMoney

Is this not the same type of crime as Watergate?


294 posted on 09/17/2008 8:37:21 PM PDT by balk (thefightnetwork.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 279 | View Replies]

To: Red in Blue PA; All

Memo to US Secret Service: Net proxy may pinpoint Palin email hackers

Not quite Anonymous

By Dan Goodin in San Francisco • Get more from this author

Posted in Security, 18th September 2008 01:22 GMT

Memo to law enforcement investigators tracking down who broke into Sarah Palin’s Yahoo email account:

Gabriel Ramuglia might be a good place to start.

The 25-year-old webmaster and entrepreneur is the operator of Ctunnel.com, the browsing proxy service used by the group that hacked into the vice presidential candidate’s personal email account and exposed its contents to the world. While he has yet to examine his logs, he says there’s a good chance they will lead to those responsible, thanks to some carelessness on their part.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2084779/posts


295 posted on 09/17/2008 8:41:13 PM PDT by Islander7 ("Common sense and common decency are uncommon virtues among America's left.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ
What are they really trying to find out..what bra size she is and whether Todd wears boxers or tidy whities....good grief this is low as an ant can go.
296 posted on 09/17/2008 8:41:38 PM PDT by jhw61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: Red in Blue PA
There are things that we can do. Gawker media publishes or owns or hosts several popular web sites, including The Consumerist and Lifehacker. All of Gawker's sites prominently list email addresses for tips.

Drop them a line asking that, in light of Gawker's egregious use of hacked emails, they might do well to publish a story on how to protect yourself against email theft. The email is tips@lifehacker.com or tips@consumerist.com

And tell them you are no longer going to visit Gawker owned web sites.

297 posted on 09/17/2008 8:42:14 PM PDT by comps4spice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Blue Turtle; wpa_mikeb

You will find few people more strongly against invasion of privacy than I.


298 posted on 09/17/2008 8:44:06 PM PDT by Gondring (I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 265 | View Replies]

To: GeeMoney

Your not kidding!


299 posted on 09/17/2008 8:46:20 PM PDT by jhw61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 279 | View Replies]

To: Gondring

Good, then maybe you should not assume that she used that email for government business when no such evidence exists that to be the case.

What happened here was illegal. Period.

I, for one, am totally outraged. This will be covered up by the MSM and will be excused by the McCain haters.


300 posted on 09/17/2008 8:47:45 PM PDT by wpa_mikeb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 298 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-50 ... 201-250251-300301-350 ... 401-416 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson