Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sarah Palin's Knockout Question (The Faith Trap The MSM Will Lay And How She Should Answer It Alert)
Worldnetdaily.com ^ | 9/22/2008 | Joseph Farah

Posted on 09/21/2008 10:29:24 PM PDT by goldstategop

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-102 next last
To: goldstategop

All she has to say is....Jesus said, in John 14:6, “I am the way the truth and the life, no man comes unto the Father, except by me.”

And smile as she says....I can not add any more to that Charlie, Anderson, Keith, Chrissy......


61 posted on 09/22/2008 4:09:32 AM PDT by LadyPilgrim ((Lifted up was He to die; It is finished was His cry; Hallelujah what a Savior!!!!!! ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chaguito

I would add..”the Bible says what happens to folks who hear the truth and reject it...it doesn’t quite elaborate on what happens to those who never had a chance to hear the truth but might have accepted it had they heard it! In the end, God is the final judge! Meanwhile I(Sarah) will be the vice president of all Americans regardless of their faith!”


62 posted on 09/22/2008 4:39:19 AM PDT by mdmathis6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

Why are non-Christians even interested in going to a Christian heaven?


63 posted on 09/22/2008 5:03:52 AM PDT by syriacus (Under Bush, Dems controlled the Senate for MOST of the 107th Congress and for ALL of the 110th)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: syriacus
Why are the critics of Christian salvation tenets pretending to care about going to a place that Christians say will be jam-packed with people who have trusted in Christ?

It makes no sense.

64 posted on 09/22/2008 5:14:10 AM PDT by syriacus (Under Bush, Dems controlled the Senate for MOST of the 107th Congress and for ALL of the 110th)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: All

Considering the nasty invasion by the media upon Ms. Palin’s life and family issues, I think she should draw
the line at having to explain her religious beliefs to anyone.

The abortion question is obvious to anyone with a brain - she has already made that decision in the beautiful form of her youngest child.

It is an extremely personal topic and why people feel the need to defend or explain what is difficult even among friends - she should refuse to submit to a third degree from people who will make nothing but insult and sarcasm
from her reply.

Tell the questioners to back off - you have to put up some boundaries Ms. Palin.


65 posted on 09/22/2008 5:32:27 AM PDT by imintrouble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Here is how I would answer that question:

Jesus Christ, himself, said that no one would come to the Father except through him and I believe his word. But he did not reveal exactly how that would work for the millions of people who either never heard of him or those who never professed belief in him. I do know, however, that he knows the heart of every man and that his judgment is perfect.

66 posted on 09/22/2008 5:35:50 AM PDT by Drawsing (The fool shows his annoyance at once. The prudent man overlooks an insult. (Proverbs 12:16))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: syriacus

One heaven with different neighborhoods. The neighborhood with a plethora of virgins is, of course, Muslim. :-)


67 posted on 09/22/2008 5:48:48 AM PDT by verity ("Lord, what fools we mortals be!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

Useless advise; the debate is going to go to specific questions (the librarian incident, specific comments by her church pastor, etc) that invites a negative conclusion without a bright-line point at which it can be addressed squarely.


68 posted on 09/22/2008 6:22:57 AM PDT by steve-b (Intelligent design is to evolutionary biology what socialism is to free-market economics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steve-b

Sarah is about to kick MSM and Democrats Butts again.


69 posted on 09/22/2008 6:39:34 AM PDT by jocko12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom

Let’s be serious. Palin already dealt with this issue on Hannity. However the question is posed I’m sure the Governor will knock it out of the ballpark. I have noticed she has a remarkable ability to turn a negative question into a positive response. And she does it with no apparent hesitation in responding to the interviewer.

The wonderful thing about Palin is that she doesn’t have to remember what she said to a different crowd about an issue. She’s open and without guile. I’ll stack up a well adjusted, contented and intelligent person like Gov. Palin against the likes of Biden and Hillery any day any time. They can certainly bring to bear all their little debating tricks and flip off quips. But Palin’s basic honesty will win the day.


70 posted on 09/22/2008 6:45:18 AM PDT by dools007
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mr Ramsbotham

It is the rare (and irrational) person indeed who does not believe that his/her faith is the correct and truth faith. Otherwise, why have a religious faith at all? What do Muslims believe about the truth of their faith? Jews? Catholics? If you do not believe that yours is the true faith, why would you even have it as a faith?

As for what Gov. Palin might say in response, I think there are a number of good answers above. I think a simple statement that “My beliefs are based upon the Holy Bible, but I recognize that others do not holds those beliefs. Each person must believe as his faith, or non-faith, directs.”

All that aside, if a person doesn’t believe that Christians are correct in what they believe, why would that ever bother them? If I believe that only men with brown eyes are going to heaven and all others are destined for hell, why should it bother you, unless you think I might be correct?


71 posted on 09/22/2008 6:57:55 AM PDT by NCLaw441
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom

“but she doesn’t believe that”

why do you say that? Christians DO believe that any who don’t accept Christ DO go to hell.


72 posted on 09/22/2008 7:55:16 AM PDT by SendShaqtoIraq
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: SendShaqtoIraq

not all.. I know she doesn’t.


73 posted on 09/22/2008 7:57:46 AM PDT by ari-freedom (We never hide from history. We make history!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Drawsing

Quoting or referring to Scripture is the best way to go. Let the lamestreams argue with Scripture or the words of Jesus Christ, instead of giving them an opening to put words in a candidate’s mouth and then spin those words to suit their agenda (”Sarah says everybody who doesn’t believe as she does is going to hell!”)


74 posted on 09/22/2008 8:40:31 AM PDT by Cecily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

You reckon if she just answered, “That’s above my pay grade”, the MSM would give HER a pass, too?


75 posted on 09/22/2008 8:56:57 AM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JaguarXKE
Please rate it and feel free to comment also (comments must be approved to keep out the vulgar posts)

Well said! A couple interesting tidbits from Damon's IMDb biography:

- His parents divorced when he was two and he spent part of his childhood in a commune in Boston with his mother, a specialist in child education.

- Grew up next door to radical historian Howard Zinn. Damon references Zinn's seminal work "A People's History of the United States" as Will in Good Will Hunting (1997).

Says it all, doesn't it?

76 posted on 09/22/2008 9:01:24 AM PDT by ssaftler (Obama in Berlin: Ich Bin Ein Empty Suit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

To refuse to talk about your faith at all is anathema to an evangelical Christian. It is not acceptable to act ashamed of Christ, which is exactly what the “it’s none of your business” answer implies.

I personally believe that only a splinter group of voters are concerned about the notion of a strong Christian leader. Most of those who aren’t Christian themselves, have the common sense to know that Christianity is not something to hold against a leader. And those who are concerned, were never in a hundred years going to vote McCain-Palin under any circumstance.

MM


77 posted on 09/22/2008 9:06:27 AM PDT by MississippiMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: All

I still maintain Palin doesn’t have to respond to queries about her religious belief.

She can tell the interviewer that is personal business and to try another set of questions more important to the people of the nation.

Religious queries and responses lead to criticism, mocking, negative response and ill will - the candidate cannot win any of those discussions because everyone has their individual belief (or none at all as it seems with some).

She doesn’t ‘owe’ any interviewer - nor us the people - her explanations - her actions have given me enough testament to her veracity and honesty backed up by a strong religious faith.

I don’t see it as being with shame at all - only personal and not requiring defensive argument or clarification.

I need no confirmation and ask no more proof from a political candidate.


78 posted on 09/22/2008 9:24:24 AM PDT by imintrouble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: MississippiMan
I personally believe that only a splinter group of voters are concerned about the notion of a strong Christian leader.

I disagree. Even some people who consider themselves Christians are not comfortable with someone who puts forth their religious beliefs all the time. Many otherwise religious people don't like having religion forced on them by others, especially if the other person doesn't agree with their own beliefs.

We are a nation that is tolerant of people of all faiths, and even though the United States was founded on Judeo- Christian beliefs, we were built on the notion that NO faith should have absolute rule.

79 posted on 09/22/2008 9:35:57 AM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom

Joh 3:18 He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God.

Joh 14:6 Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.

Mat 10:28 And fear not, them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear him which is able to destroy both soul and body in hell.

As Christians, we do not get to pick and choose which parts of the Bible to believe.

So, if Ms. Palin is Christian, she does believe non-Christians will reside in hell.


80 posted on 09/22/2008 9:41:15 AM PDT by SendShaqtoIraq
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-102 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson