BS
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 next last
To: Artemis Webb
How in the world did a grand jury get it this quickly, they just served the warrant on Monday, and generally, Grand Juries serve for a week or two at a time?
Something doesn’t smell right with this story.
2 posted on
09/23/2008 12:18:54 PM PDT by
mnehring
To: Artemis Webb
I would hope this isn’t the end of this matter.
3 posted on
09/23/2008 12:19:06 PM PDT by
ConservativeMind
(What's "Price Gouging"? Should government force us to sell to the 15th highest bidder on eBay?)
To: Artemis Webb
I hope nobody else posted this. It took about six minutes from the time I started it to the time FR finally completed cycling the post.
4 posted on
09/23/2008 12:19:33 PM PDT by
Artemis Webb
(Sarah Palin: Babies, Guns, Jesus. HOT DAMN!)
To: Artemis Webb
5 posted on
09/23/2008 12:19:40 PM PDT by
PhiKapMom
( BOOMER SOONER -- VOTE FOR McCAIN/PALIN2008! LetsGetThisRight.com)
To: Artemis Webb
Nothing will come of this, afterall, this crime was against a republican.
7 posted on
09/23/2008 12:20:46 PM PDT by
rockabyebaby
(Say what you feel, those who matter don't mind, those who mind don't matter.)
To: Artemis Webb
The American Spectator's title isn't exactly accurate, it makes it seem there was a no bill, not the case. From the original article in the Chattanoogan:
An indictment in the case was not included in the first batch made public early Tuesday afternoon. Indictments are sometimes not made public for several days or weeks.
8 posted on
09/23/2008 12:21:59 PM PDT by
mnehring
To: Artemis Webb
It is not over until it is over. "adjourned today" sounds like there will be further testimony. From the story,
"The Knoxville News-Sentinel reported that Kernell has retained the services of attorney Wade Davies, who issued a statement saying, "We are confident that the truth will emerge as we go through the process. David is a decent and intelligent young man, and I look forward to assisting him during this difficult period."
10 posted on
09/23/2008 12:25:09 PM PDT by
kabar
(.)
To: Artemis Webb
It depends on what the word hacking means.
From a nation of laws to a nation of lawlessness.
The next few years should prove very interesting.
Lock & load.
11 posted on
09/23/2008 12:25:54 PM PDT by
G.Mason
(Duty, Honor, Country)
To: Artemis Webb
I knew it!...the fix was in and DON'T be surprised if they HIT Palin with an OCT. Surprise with some of the info they raided from her emails. The ZERO camp has them in their hands as we speak!! Bank on it!
To: Artemis Webb
"but ended its session around noon without returning an indictment."Session - I infer that there will be more though, I don't think the case is over without an indictment.
14 posted on
09/23/2008 12:29:01 PM PDT by
Abathar
(Proudly posting without reading the article carefully since 2004)
To: Artemis Webb
Why does this not surprise me?
16 posted on
09/23/2008 12:30:27 PM PDT by
Purrcival
(Palin runs Alaska. Obama runs his mouth.)
To: Artemis Webb
18 posted on
09/23/2008 12:31:14 PM PDT by
Cheerio
To: Artemis Webb
What exactly is the charge?
19 posted on
09/23/2008 12:31:45 PM PDT by
ctdonath2
(The average piece of junk is more meaningful than our criticism designating it so. - Ratatouille)
To: Artemis Webb
Is a grand jury required to indict or is some prosecutor just covering his behind?
To: Artemis Webb
If the District Attorney wants an indictment he will get an indictment. OTOH, if he doesn't want one then he won't get one. So we are in the same old political game that we are always in. If the wrong power-that-be picked the DA then we lose. If the good-guys picked the DA then we win. The speed with which they took this to a Grand Jury makes the whole thing look very suspicious to me. I mean what's the rush? Do they really have all the evidence in hand and organized? I really doubt it.
I'm not making any bets but I'm on record as predicting a slap on the hand and two weeks of public service. I hope I'm wrong.
To: Artemis Webb
If this is simply the unilateral act of a college kid, I don’t see the point of giving him a criminal record for a stupid stunt.
26 posted on
09/23/2008 12:35:30 PM PDT by
stinkerpot65
(Global warming is a Marxist lie.)
To: Artemis Webb
Did they adjourn or done? Change the venue to Alaska!
27 posted on
09/23/2008 12:36:35 PM PDT by
hamboy
To: Artemis Webb
No indictment yet, it should read.
If the jury didn’t return a No Bill, the matter is still in process.
28 posted on
09/23/2008 12:36:43 PM PDT by
Glenn
(Free Venezuela!)
To: Artemis Webb
Break into a Watergate office to look for dirt on a Democrat, big problem. Break into a Yahoo email account to look for dirt on a Republican, blame the victim for not using better security.
30 posted on
09/23/2008 12:42:25 PM PDT by
Reeses
(Leftism is powered by the evil force of envy.)
To: Artemis Webb
I would still like to know if this punk can be pursued by the Palins in a civil suit?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson