Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

BS
1 posted on 09/23/2008 12:16:30 PM PDT by Artemis Webb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last
To: Artemis Webb

How in the world did a grand jury get it this quickly, they just served the warrant on Monday, and generally, Grand Juries serve for a week or two at a time?

Something doesn’t smell right with this story.


2 posted on 09/23/2008 12:18:54 PM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Artemis Webb

I would hope this isn’t the end of this matter.


3 posted on 09/23/2008 12:19:06 PM PDT by ConservativeMind (What's "Price Gouging"? Should government force us to sell to the 15th highest bidder on eBay?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Artemis Webb
I hope nobody else posted this. It took about six minutes from the time I started it to the time FR finally completed cycling the post.
4 posted on 09/23/2008 12:19:33 PM PDT by Artemis Webb (Sarah Palin: Babies, Guns, Jesus. HOT DAMN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Artemis Webb

BS is right!


5 posted on 09/23/2008 12:19:40 PM PDT by PhiKapMom ( BOOMER SOONER -- VOTE FOR McCAIN/PALIN2008! LetsGetThisRight.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Artemis Webb

Nothing will come of this, afterall, this crime was against a republican.


7 posted on 09/23/2008 12:20:46 PM PDT by rockabyebaby (Say what you feel, those who matter don't mind, those who mind don't matter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Artemis Webb
The American Spectator's title isn't exactly accurate, it makes it seem there was a no bill, not the case. From the original article in the Chattanoogan:

An indictment in the case was not included in the first batch made public early Tuesday afternoon. Indictments are sometimes not made public for several days or weeks.

8 posted on 09/23/2008 12:21:59 PM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Artemis Webb
It is not over until it is over. "adjourned today" sounds like there will be further testimony. From the story,

"The Knoxville News-Sentinel reported that Kernell has retained the services of attorney Wade Davies, who issued a statement saying, "We are confident that the truth will emerge as we go through the process. David is a decent and intelligent young man, and I look forward to assisting him during this difficult period."

10 posted on 09/23/2008 12:25:09 PM PDT by kabar (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Artemis Webb
It depends on what the word hacking means.


From a nation of laws to a nation of lawlessness.


The next few years should prove very interesting.

Lock & load.

11 posted on 09/23/2008 12:25:54 PM PDT by G.Mason (Duty, Honor, Country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Artemis Webb
I knew it!...the fix was in and DON'T be surprised if they HIT Palin with an OCT. Surprise with some of the info they raided from her emails. The ZERO camp has them in their hands as we speak!! Bank on it!
12 posted on 09/23/2008 12:26:54 PM PDT by RoseofTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Artemis Webb
"but ended its session around noon without returning an indictment."

Session - I infer that there will be more though, I don't think the case is over without an indictment.

14 posted on 09/23/2008 12:29:01 PM PDT by Abathar (Proudly posting without reading the article carefully since 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Artemis Webb

Why does this not surprise me?


16 posted on 09/23/2008 12:30:27 PM PDT by Purrcival (Palin runs Alaska. Obama runs his mouth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Artemis Webb

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2087766/posts?page=24#24


18 posted on 09/23/2008 12:31:14 PM PDT by Cheerio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Artemis Webb

What exactly is the charge?


19 posted on 09/23/2008 12:31:45 PM PDT by ctdonath2 (The average piece of junk is more meaningful than our criticism designating it so. - Ratatouille)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Artemis Webb

Is a grand jury required to indict or is some prosecutor just covering his behind?


21 posted on 09/23/2008 12:33:01 PM PDT by the_Watchman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Artemis Webb
If the District Attorney wants an indictment he will get an indictment. OTOH, if he doesn't want one then he won't get one. So we are in the same old political game that we are always in. If the wrong power-that-be picked the DA then we lose. If the good-guys picked the DA then we win. The speed with which they took this to a Grand Jury makes the whole thing look very suspicious to me. I mean what's the rush? Do they really have all the evidence in hand and organized? I really doubt it.

I'm not making any bets but I'm on record as predicting a slap on the hand and two weeks of public service. I hope I'm wrong.

25 posted on 09/23/2008 12:35:29 PM PDT by InterceptPoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Artemis Webb

If this is simply the unilateral act of a college kid, I don’t see the point of giving him a criminal record for a stupid stunt.


26 posted on 09/23/2008 12:35:30 PM PDT by stinkerpot65 (Global warming is a Marxist lie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Artemis Webb

Did they adjourn or done? Change the venue to Alaska!


27 posted on 09/23/2008 12:36:35 PM PDT by hamboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Artemis Webb

No indictment yet, it should read.

If the jury didn’t return a No Bill, the matter is still in process.


28 posted on 09/23/2008 12:36:43 PM PDT by Glenn (Free Venezuela!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Artemis Webb
Break into a Watergate office to look for dirt on a Democrat, big problem. Break into a Yahoo email account to look for dirt on a Republican, blame the victim for not using better security.
30 posted on 09/23/2008 12:42:25 PM PDT by Reeses (Leftism is powered by the evil force of envy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Artemis Webb

I would still like to know if this punk can be pursued by the Palins in a civil suit?


34 posted on 09/23/2008 12:46:18 PM PDT by mrmargaritaville
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson