Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

McCain tells 'Dispatch' that bailout is emergency measure 'to stop bleeding'
The Columbus Dispatch ^ | September 28, 2008 | Joe Hallett

Posted on 09/28/2008 5:11:27 PM PDT by buccaneer81

McCain tells 'Dispatch' that bailout is emergency measure 'to stop bleeding' Republican nominee says Paulson, Bernanke convinced him plan needed Sunday, September 28, 2008 7:36 PM By Joe Hallett THE COLUMBUS DISPATCH Along with Sen. Barack Obama, Sen. John McCain has embraced a $700 billion bailout of the nation's troubled financial industry.

In a telephone interview with The Dispatch from Washington yesterday, McCain said that Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke convinced him that the rescue plan is necessary.

"I'm sure everybody understands that this was something that just had to be done," McCain said. "I'm kind of sorry in a way, but the tone of voice that Bernanke and Paulson used about this crisis, I've never heard anything like it in the years that I've been in public office, or alive."

McCain and his running mate, Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, will appear at a rally this morning at Capital University. In advance of the visit, McCain talked with The Dispatch about the financial crisis and other topics:

Dispatch: Some commentators criticized you for what they called erratic statements and actions last week heading into negotiations on rescuing the economy. Describe how you played a productive role in all this.

McCain: I'll leave that up to others to make that judgment. This was an issue that was transcendent. I suspended my campaign and came back to Washington because I thought that it was vital to do so. Sen. Obama said he was available to discuss the issue by phone. I didn't want to phone it in. I'm proud that we were able to get this done, and I'll give the credit to everybody else.

Dispatch: In the final analysis, what makes you think this bailout plan will work?

McCain: Well, I think that it has to. The world's financial structure as well as this nation's is under enormous pressures. I don't think it's our recovery. What I think it is, is an emergency measure to try to stop the bleeding. We've got a long way to go. This isn't the beginning of the end; it's the end of the beginning if we pass this, and I'm optimistic that we will.

Look, we've got to create jobs for working families, working families have to be able to educate their kids, they have to stay in their homes, and that's the key to this. In the meantime, we couldn't allow them not to be able to go and get the loans that small businesses need, the credit that people need to do the things that are necessary to educate their kids. This was a critical moment, but it's certainly a long way from ending the financial difficulties that working families are undergoing right now.

Dispatch: You have campaigned frequently in Ohio. Can you win the presidency without winning Ohio?

McCain: It would be very, very hard. You and I both know that you've got to go all the way back to Jack Kennedy (in 1960 to find a nominee who lost Ohio and still won the presidency). I think it would be very difficult, and I don't intend to find that out. I will campaign as hard as I can in the state of Ohio. I've got a real head wind, and I know that I'm the underdog.

Dispatch: Polling indicates and even Democrats concede that race will be a factor against Sen. Obama in Ohio. How would you feel if you won narrowly in this state and race was the deciding factor?

McCain: I just don't think that could possibly happen because I rely on the good judgment of the people of Ohio and America. Times are too tough. They're going to make a decision based on who they think can best bring some kind of economic future to working families in Ohio and across this country. I just have an abiding faith in the American people that, particularly in these times, that they'll make the choice based on who is best to lead.

Dispatch: What would you say to voters who are inclined to make race the basis for their vote?

McCain: I wouldn't do that. I urge them strongly that these are too perilous times, both national-security-wise and economically. All I can say to them is do what they think is best for them and their country.

jhallett@dispatch.com


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 110th; bailout; mccain
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last
We're sunk.
1 posted on 09/28/2008 5:11:28 PM PDT by buccaneer81
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: buccaneer81

Do you want a new age progressive or a traditionalist progressive? Otherwise, I’m not seeing much of a difference between the two.

McCain should oppose this bailout and rail against the Democrats who let Fannie and Freddie get out of control.


2 posted on 09/28/2008 5:13:58 PM PDT by Harry Wurzbach (Rep. Thaddeus McCotter is my hero.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: buccaneer81

The only people who were “bleeding” were the maggots on Wall Street who gave bad loans to other maggots who couldn’t afford them. It doesn’t make sense to give them 700 billion taxpayer dollars so they can continue doing it.


3 posted on 09/28/2008 5:14:41 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Here's your "crap" sandwich! Eat up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: buccaneer81

What’s to stop the blood from spewing out of my eyes, ears, and mouth tomorrow?


4 posted on 09/28/2008 5:14:42 PM PDT by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: buccaneer81

The only people who were “bleeding” were the maggots on Wall Street who gave bad loans to other maggots who couldn’t afford them. It doesn’t make sense to give them 700 billion taxpayer dollars so they can continue doing it.


5 posted on 09/28/2008 5:14:55 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Here's your "crap" sandwich! Eat up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: buccaneer81

This was from yesterday!


6 posted on 09/28/2008 5:15:04 PM PDT by HuntsvilleTxVeteran (Obama and ITS thugs are made paranoid by Sarahnoia. (stole from molly_jack2007))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Harry Wurzbach

there is no choice. Maybe if we would have won the election in 2006, we wouldnt be here.


7 posted on 09/28/2008 5:15:36 PM PDT by se_ohio_young_conservative (McCain/Palin 08...Dont stop believin...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: buccaneer81

His hero is Theodore Roosevelt. Roosevelt was a progressive, a big-government liberal in his day.

Well, even Roosevelt might’ve balked at bailing out Wall Street.


8 posted on 09/28/2008 5:15:36 PM PDT by Harry Wurzbach (Rep. Thaddeus McCotter is my hero.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: buccaneer81

When and at what time was this interview conducted?


9 posted on 09/28/2008 5:15:41 PM PDT by ABQHispConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Harry Wurzbach
You are a freaking brain dead in in the extreme if you don't see much difference between Barry the Marxist and John McCain.
10 posted on 09/28/2008 5:16:27 PM PDT by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: buccaneer81

God I miss Fred Thompson. I’ve pasted Fred’s take below.

The Danger of Government Guarantees

I’ll bet it came as a surprise to most folks that the financial stability of the world as we know it depends upon the survival of a couple of outfits called Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Yet that’s what the so-called experts are telling us. Moreover, we taxpayers are now being asked to guarantee Fannie and Freddie’s tab, one that could make the $124 billion S&L bailout of the late 1980s look cheap.

So how did we get stuck with this bill? Well, Congress wanted to “do something” about what it saw as a “housing problem.” To them that meant that they should create an even bigger problem.

So Congress passed laws that made it easier for hopeful home-buyers to buy houses … even when they couldn’t afford them. Then the Fed and other regulators helped, in the form of easy money and loose credit standards for mortgages.

Not surprisingly demand for houses grew, home prices rose, lenders financed additional questionable mortgages, fueling even higher prices and so on. You get the picture. This is called a bubble.

Then an amazing thing happened – apparently impossible to foresee. Home prices did not continue to rise forever! Home prices came down and easy money dried up, causing the above mentioned cycle to reverse. In other words, the bubble burst.

So you’d think the in-over-their-heads homebuyers and the mortgage bankers would take the hit, and the market would right itself. No reason for an international meltdown here, right?

Not so fast my friends. Years earlier Congress established Fannie and Freddie as purchasers of these mortgages, which they could bundle up, repackage and sell to investors, freeing up more mortgage money. As government creations tend to do, the two companies grew until they either owned or guaranteed about half the nation’s $12 trillion dollars in mortgages.

Fannie and Fred were “government sponsored enterprises” which means heads they win, tails you lose. If they make money stockholders, creditors and Fannie and Freddie employees – some making millions annually – get the benefit. But now that mortgages have hit the skids, with mounting losses, the taxpayers potentially face trillions in exposure. This is because there is an “implicit” (read “actual”) government guarantee of Fannie and Freddie’s obligations and both are now too big to be allowed to fail. This is called the “bailout phase,” which will probably lead to a bigger bubble in the future.

Lost in this immense, complex mess is the root problem most people are missing: the government is gradually becoming the guarantor of seemingly every important aspect of American secular life, creating incentives and bureaucracies that cause failure and invite fraud.

In Fan and Fred’s case, it was in no one’s interest to turn off the bubble machine. Just the opposite. The system induced borrowers to take on financial obligations they could not afford and lenders to lower lending standards. Fannie and Freddie went along because their managers’ compensation depended on the firms’ short term financial performance. And investors continued to buy complex security packages they didn’t understand, because the securities were viewed as government-backed.

Heavy campaign contributions by those benefiting from this scheme induced Members of Congress to avert their gaze from the ugly mess that was unfolding.

You’d think we’d have learned by now: when the backstop of the federal treasury makes it easier for politicians, lenders, borrowers, welfare recipients, government contractors, or anyone else, to serve their own self interest at the expense of the taxpayer, many will do just that.

That is why we continue to see self-dealing, moral lapses, outright fraud and lack of management and oversight in a wide array of programs and government-sponsored entities, from housing to Medicare, education and the Small Business Administration, all costing taxpayers billions, even trillions of dollars.

Our Founding Fathers knew more than a little bit about human nature. It is one reason why in the Constitution, the federal government was given certain delineated powers and no others. I hate to burst another bubble, but our government simply doesn’t have the authority or the capability to be the guarantor or insurer of our every need or desire. Isn’t it time we started sending that message loud and clear to the big enablers in Washington?

Fred Thompson


11 posted on 09/28/2008 5:16:41 PM PDT by NavVet ( If you don't defend Conservatism in the Primaries, you won't have it to defend in November)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: buccaneer81

What the Dispatch isn’t saying is WHICH rescue plan. Is it the revised one, or the original? At this point I’d be happy if they kept the ACORN, La Raza, etc. junk out of the plan.


12 posted on 09/28/2008 5:16:48 PM PDT by madison10 (Pray for the brave Republicans in Congress...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: se_ohio_young_conservative
Maybe if we would have won the election in 2006, we wouldnt be here.

Yea but certain "geniuses" thought we needed to be taught a lesson.

13 posted on 09/28/2008 5:17:48 PM PDT by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: buccaneer81

I hope he gets the opportunity to vote NO on this pile of sh1t bill at least as a point for the next debate. nObama has sucked all the air out of the media for two days and if not, we will have to hear John McCain at the next debate going Me Too! Me Too! I agree with Senator Obama that the pile of sh1t we just passed was the best thing to do...


14 posted on 09/28/2008 5:18:19 PM PDT by IllumiNaughtyByNature (I Love The Smell Of Schmidt Storm in the Morning...and Afternoon....and at Night!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmericaUnited

I guess you have to be “brain dead” to see that both Obama and McCain are about to support an expansion of the federal government by about 33%, at least.


15 posted on 09/28/2008 5:21:19 PM PDT by Harry Wurzbach (Rep. Thaddeus McCotter is my hero.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran
This was from yesterday!

Yeah, when ACORN was still in the package. Do you really think he'll say no now?

16 posted on 09/28/2008 5:21:57 PM PDT by buccaneer81 (Bob Taft has soiled the family name for the next century.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ABQHispConservative
When and at what time was this interview conducted?

Well, it says yesterday, but it first appeared online @ 7:52 EDT tonight.

17 posted on 09/28/2008 5:23:56 PM PDT by buccaneer81 (Bob Taft has soiled the family name for the next century.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: NavVet

I wish McCain were saying this.


18 posted on 09/28/2008 5:24:04 PM PDT by kenavi (BHO: The only constant is change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Harry Wurzbach

You really are brain dead fool! The bill that Barry and Friends tried to ram throgh is dramtically different than the one that the House GOP helped draft.


19 posted on 09/28/2008 5:25:29 PM PDT by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: buccaneer81
Well, like he said, economics was never his strong suit.

The tragic crime of all this is that it is not an economic crisis but a political one.

20 posted on 09/28/2008 5:25:31 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson