Posted on 10/07/2008 6:14:40 PM PDT by mathwhizz
Palin a drag on WHAT ticket? More like anyone else would drag her ticket.
Well, right now she’s the frontrunner for ‘12, no doubt about it.
These Massachussetes liberal pundits are so laughable. My dog will have a better chance than Romney in 2012. Romney is soooooooo yesterday. He’ll be well advised to run for senate when Kennedy dies perhaps in a few months.
More like Palin, Romney ticket.
I can tell romney and Huckabee are both working the 2012
angle and if MCain loses , I am sure the 3 front runners
will be Palin , Romney and Huckabee.
Palin has that Ronald Reagan thing , not so sure there is any hope for the others
Mr. Romney has the right to run again, just like anybody else. However, why anyone would consider his advice on *this* election relevant is beyond me. (Hint: He LOST in the primary ...)
You play with your friends. the democrats boycotted foxnews network.
Sarah, and the American people owe the MSM zero. It is what they are getting.
Only an idiot forms a ticket for 2012 even before the end of this cycle. Don’t know about the rest of you but this has on democrat standards been a four year election cycle and I am voting every incumbent out but I am tired of this.
Palin is NOT a drag on the ticket.
I did cancel my emails from mymanmitt.com cause whatever his name is started putting out negative junk on Sarah. But that has nothing to do with Mitt.
Romney should run for senator after Kennedy dies. That’ll be much quicker than waiting for 4 years.
With a 150 million dollars and no conservatives in the race (in a major way) then Romney almost succeeded in pulling off a liberal coup of sorts.
In 2012 there would be a two term Governor Palin with huge ratings and a second term Governor Bobby Jindal with huge ratings.
The conservatives are back, and we won’t be caught flat footed in 2012.
We win this one anyway.
Romney looks like he’d be Biden’s boss at the used car dealership.
Mitt is the second coming of Barry Goldwater, compared to a Kennedy.
Can we get through this election first?
I think that’s exactly the point Romney was making: let Sarah be Sarah. I think he makes a fair observation in that the liberals have been clutching at what she says and trying to play her off as an inexperienced buffoon. The whole foreign relations experience by being able to see Russia comment, for instance.
To an extent that’s hurt the left, as the public has recoiled a bit. But there’s no doubt it hurt the ticket after that initial huge surge. The media literally went on a Palin feeding frenzy shortly after that bump, and it’s only been after the debate where she held her own that they let up a bit.
Mitt was my first choice for Presidential candidate, as well as Vice-Presidential. I haven’t changed my mind. I have a slight concern about his electability — he comes off as a little false at times.
RINO scum like Romney are the cancer that destroyed the GOP.
I'm saving that post for the 2012 timecapsule...'cause it is dead on and will need repeating come Feb 2012
A little false -- at times?
You mean when he's lying about owning a gun?
Or lying about being a hunter?
Or lying about his gun-grabbing record?
Or lying about both he and his father marching with MLK?
Or lying about his pro-abortion record?
Or lying about his support for gay rights?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.