Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Well here is the Acorn Fraud continuing on behalf of Barak Hussein Obama!
1 posted on 10/27/2008 1:03:28 PM PDT by OPS4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: OPS4

Court: “Well, we’re kinda busy right now... we can look into your suit, somewhere around APRIL 2016!!


2 posted on 10/27/2008 1:09:08 PM PDT by gwilhelm56 (Orwell's 1984 - to Conservatives a WARNING, to Liberals - a TEXTBOOK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: OPS4

Yeah, good luck with that.


3 posted on 10/27/2008 1:09:14 PM PDT by autumnraine (Churchill: " we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall never surrender")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: OPS4

Yeah - good luck with that lawsuit....

At worst they’ll be forced to apologize and the next day they’ll go back to work on what they do.


4 posted on 10/27/2008 1:09:57 PM PDT by Tzimisce (How Would Mohammed Vote? Obama for President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: OPS4

6 posted on 10/27/2008 1:11:24 PM PDT by kingattax (99 % of liberals give the rest a bad name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: OPS4

No Standing.........


7 posted on 10/27/2008 1:11:59 PM PDT by Red Badger (My wallet is made out of depleted you-owe-mium........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: OPS4

Would Acorn’s defense be the following:

Given Obama’s stance on redistribution of wealth and ACORN targeting low income and the homeless for voter registration, it is only fair that these groups get redistribution of voting in reverse. That is why low income should get to vote twice, three times, and more.


8 posted on 10/27/2008 1:13:05 PM PDT by sball (If)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: OPS4

No Standing! Its the latest in judicial activism


9 posted on 10/27/2008 1:15:23 PM PDT by stocksthatgoup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: OPS4
I'm afraid, if what I read here is true, that the "election" must go forward BEFORE anything can be done (assuming there is fraud in the first place ... assuming any judge will DO anything about it in the second place, ... assuming the Congress does no damage to the Republic before anything can happen in the third place ... assuming Congressional interferance can be corrected in the fourth place ...... IF there is a review, and IF it is adjudicated to the negating of any damage done ... and et-cetera places beyond).
10 posted on 10/27/2008 1:16:18 PM PDT by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Owl_Eagle; brityank; Physicist; WhyisaTexasgirlinPA; GOPJ; abner; baseballmom; Mo1; Ciexyz; ...

ping


13 posted on 10/28/2008 5:09:15 AM PDT by Tribune7 (Obama wants to put the same crowd that ran Fannie Mae in charge of health care)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson