Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Next Up for Sarah Palin: US Senator?
Kansas City Star ^ | Yael T. Abouhalkah

Posted on 11/05/2008 3:00:46 AM PST by lewisglad

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-175 next last
To: Dahoser

Turns out that Mitt was just echoing the party line that McCain put out not to call Obama a socialist. The jury is still out on the staffers because there a lot of conflicting reports. So while I won’t call him Mittens any more, it’s still Palin 2012 or bust.


121 posted on 11/05/2008 8:03:46 AM PST by Dahoser (America's great untapped alternative energy source: The Founding Fathers spinning in their graves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: acsuc99

I agree. She’d be wasting her time in Congress. Stick with the governorship until 2012.


122 posted on 11/05/2008 8:05:09 AM PST by warsaw44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SonsOfLibertyII
After giving our treasure and time to attend her rally.

???


Obviously you have no comprehension of the effort she put into the campaign trail. She owes nothing to anyone on the national scene. She pulled out all the stops and did everything in her power to win. She wanted to work for America. That would be all of us.

What she does now, and while she is governor, I'm watching. If she wants to go for it again, I will get out my wallet, I will volunteer again, I will work harder to get her elected! Hopefully, so will everyone else!

She has a heart of gold, and will be happy to have her back in the state as our governess!
123 posted on 11/05/2008 8:06:26 AM PST by Issaquahking (This is the kind of person our forefathers wanted to run the country!!! Go Sarah Go!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: lewisglad

I personally think she should go back to governing the state she loves. She’s way too good for the likes of Washington.


124 posted on 11/05/2008 8:08:02 AM PST by jersey117
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redk

She is an arrogant women whose ambition trumps all else even her own child, she wasn’t crying for you, don’t worry and wake up.


125 posted on 11/05/2008 8:09:41 AM PST by rodeo-mamma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: lewisglad

If we want Sarah to make a good presidential run in 12 she needs to stay where she is. Historically governors have a much better shat at the presidency than senators. This year things got a skewed because almost everybody that ran was a current or former senator, but normally the Senate is not a stepping stone to the White House.


126 posted on 11/05/2008 8:12:23 AM PST by dilvish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coldwater Creek; singfreedom
If Stevens steps down now, she could appoint herself to fill the remainder of Steven’s term. At least, that’s how it works here. They wouldn’t even need an special election!

Bad idea.

A governor in Minnesota did that back in the 1970s. When Mondale resigned to be Carter's VP, Wendell Anderson resigned as Governor, and then the Lt. Governor Rudy Perpich succeeded him.

Perpich then appointed Anderson to the Senator's seat. In the subsequent election, Republicans swept both Senate Seats and the Governor's office. It's still known as the "Minnesota Massacre".

I think that Alaska requires a special election, after Murkowski appointed his daughter to a vacancy. And you know how that worked out for him.

Sarah might do well in the special election, but I suspect she would rather stay in Alaska.

127 posted on 11/05/2008 8:18:36 AM PST by justlurking (The only remedy for a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: rodeo-mamma

Wow how long have you known her personally?


128 posted on 11/05/2008 8:19:34 AM PST by redk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: lewisglad

Sarah is going to destroy the party if she gets the nomination because there will be a major third party revolt. Also, expect lots of cross over votes from the Democrats to make her the nominee. Don’t you get it? Democratic operatives from within the Republican party were responsible for her being chosen. They want to win and they don’t care how they do it. Why can’t people wake up? I can’t wait to here Michael Savage this afternoon. Finally, maybe we can get an honest assessment of what went wrong.


129 posted on 11/05/2008 8:20:00 AM PST by rodeo-mamma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: lewisglad

I think it makes sense for her to remain Governor and stay as far away from DC as possible. She can run for re-election in 2010. By 2012 she’ll have had plenty of ‘experience’.

Of course, it would be interesting if she did show up in the Senate early next year and become one of the most visible Republicans in DC, a leading spokesperson for the party. That’s what I think the GOP needs right now.

Granted, she then would be in the belly of the beast instead of staying far outside, ready to launch an assault with Gov. Jindal on Leviathan in 2012.

Right now Gov. Palin is the most charismatic Republican on the national stage. She’s also a straightforward conservative. And if she runs in 2012 she’d have the same amount of senatorial experience as the guy who just won did when he was elected.

Who else do we have in DC to represent the GOP well?


130 posted on 11/05/2008 8:28:22 AM PST by Harry Wurzbach (Joe The Plumber & Rep. Thaddeus McCotter are my heroes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justlurking

You’re right, I had forgotten about that fiasco.


131 posted on 11/05/2008 8:29:40 AM PST by Coldwater Creek ("There is no insanity greater than electing a pathological Narcissist as president.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: rodeo-mamma

You obviously stongly dislike her on a personal level. I’m sorry you are not hearing what you want to hear today.


132 posted on 11/05/2008 8:35:27 AM PST by redk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: lewisglad

She has a better shot for President as a Governor.


133 posted on 11/05/2008 8:37:22 AM PST by Republic of Texas (Socialism Always Fails)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lewisglad

I’d rather see her run for president against Obama in the next 4 years....she doesn’t need to be learning how to water down her message in the senate.


134 posted on 11/05/2008 8:38:20 AM PST by Taggart_D
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rodeo-mamma
LMAO! I thought you sounded kinda nuts...now I understand...I can’t wait to here Michael Savage this afternoon. Finally, maybe we can get an honest assessment of what went wrong.
135 posted on 11/05/2008 8:38:22 AM PST by Snurple (VEGETARIAN, OLD INDIAN WORD FOR BAD HUNTER.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: Issaquahking

Don’t take me out of context!!!! I scream at you!! I told you I love her, LOVE her. We just must have her in the Senate, ok we will settle for Todd but must have at least one of them.


136 posted on 11/05/2008 8:42:48 AM PST by SonsOfLibertyII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: SonsOfLibertyII

I’m still undecided on this. I was totally against her being in the Senate but now people have convinced me it might be good.


137 posted on 11/05/2008 8:48:02 AM PST by redk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: acsuc99

I agree. The only reason why a senator won this time is that the other guy was a senator. Historically, governors have better chances of winning. Besides, Patomac water is particularly rancid in Capitol Hill.


138 posted on 11/05/2008 8:51:32 AM PST by Arthur Wildfire! March (Rats messed up this economy: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2115485/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Snurple

You’re darn tootin right I’m looking forward to it and I’ll let you know what he says, ok!!!


139 posted on 11/05/2008 8:56:23 AM PST by rodeo-mamma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: lewisglad

Who cares what they think.

She should stay where she is as governor, far away from the communist filth the infests Washington. If she goes to the senate she will be a very junior member, with little chance to do anything but fend off cheap shots from the rats there. As governor she can continue to serve as an executive and showcase her abilities in forming policies. As a senator she will only be able to be a member of the minority party from an overlooked state. She has a better chance of becoming president in 4 years as a successful governor than as a senator from an incredibly unpopular Congress.


140 posted on 11/05/2008 9:32:14 AM PST by frankiep (Every socialist is a disguised dictator - Ludwig von Mises)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-175 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson