Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Comments?
1 posted on 11/14/2008 10:42:35 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: 2ndDivisionVet

We boycott these anti Prop 8 supporters in the movie industry. Their livelihoods are possible with our money. If they are unwilling to allow a debate on ideas, then they can wallow in their self-pity. But I for one will do all my power to stop funding these pro-gay groups.

So if the list of groups and entities that support anti prop 8 groups becomes available, then I will plan my purchases accordingly. These scum only have the power we give them, so lets take it away from them.


2 posted on 11/14/2008 10:50:16 PM PST by ABQHispConservative (Liberal + Democrat = Socialist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Here's the best way to defeat this. Find out who's on the blacklist and patronize them whenever you can.

There are a lot more of us than of them.
3 posted on 11/14/2008 10:51:44 PM PST by Antoninus (America didn't turn away from conservatism, they turned away from many who faked it. - Mark Sanford)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Lets enter a fresh scenario. All of the supporters of banning gay marriage...stop supporting any business that supports gays. The ban supporters then announce no intention of attending movies or watching tv stations that support the pro-gay marriage proposal. The ban supporters then search out the newspapers which were pro-gay marriage.

Finally, the ban supporters start to refuse to travel into various California tourist areas. We then start inviting non-Californians into this entire discussion...which might not be what the pro-gay crowd really would want. If you had 250 million people discussing this...and 180 million are negative...then serious problems start to occur within this currently “friendly process”. The numbers here...on the ballot results...are the best you can get out of any state in the US. If this had been attempted in Texas....the ban folks would have gotten well over 75 percent.


4 posted on 11/14/2008 10:53:52 PM PST by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
I'm working on a column for Sunday in which I discuss why it's in the interest of prudent social conservatives and prudent gay rights activists to come to some sort of settlement that would allow for gay marriage while establishing a zone of protection of religious liberty around religious institutions, for the sake of religious freedom. But I fear that the gay rights movement isn't interested in that -- that it's only interested in crushing its enemies.

Rod's right about how they're only interested in crushing its enemites. So why is he calling for "allowing" for gay "marriage" by "prudent social conservatives"? If he's the Christian he says he is, he should be fighting hard for preserving traditional marriage. There's more than enough people calling for "allowing" gay "marriage."

5 posted on 11/14/2008 10:54:33 PM PST by Pyro7480 (This Papist asks everyone to continue to pray the Rosary for our country!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

>”But I do believe there comes a time when you cannot sit back and accept what I think is the most dangerous form of bigotry.”<

Personally, I always thought the most obnoxious and petty form of bigotry was against those who disagree.

But I guess if I was only more “cultured” my opinion would matter...


7 posted on 11/14/2008 11:03:29 PM PST by Tzimisce (http://groups.myspace.com/nailthemessiah)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The first thing people of faith need to do is to stop going to all movies. We need to put the purveyors of perversion in Hollywood out of business.

How about organizing our churches to boycott the movie theaters for the next year?


8 posted on 11/14/2008 11:10:33 PM PST by kaehurowing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
"But what happens when people ... start losing their job because of their political and religious beliefs?"

The source of these problems lies in laws like McCain-Feingold and some state disclosure rules that require campaign donors to list their business name and occupation.

In my case, living in L.A., this actually keeps me from contributing to any campaigns. It's literally a threat to job security. No joke.

These laws are blatantly unconstitutional. And now we see why. Retribution.

If we had had these laws in 1787, we would have no Constitution today. It's very sad that Souter, O'Connor, Stevens, Ginsburg, and Breyer never read the pseudonymous Federalist Papers.

9 posted on 11/14/2008 11:12:12 PM PST by PressurePoint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
A prominent theatrical director in California,
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Boycotts and blacklisting can work both ways.

I bet if pro-Prop 8 supporters boycotted that theater for firing the Mormon director that theater would be out of business within the year.

13 posted on 11/14/2008 11:38:22 PM PST by wintertime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

religous persecution isn’t discrimination?


14 posted on 11/15/2008 12:13:03 AM PST by Tempest (Obama is not my president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I remember the Screen Actors Guild president Melissa Gilbert having a fit because conservatives wanted to boycott leftist entertainers who were anti-war.

Well, I don’t expect the SGA or anyone else out in leftie Hollywood to open their traps about this.


16 posted on 11/15/2008 1:00:15 AM PST by Nextrush (Sarah Palin is the new Ronald Reagan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I think if they really want to make an impact, they need to start painting stars on these people’s homes.


17 posted on 11/15/2008 1:03:38 AM PST by I_like_good_things_too (Check the "Yes" box next to survival)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Eugene Volokh, the UCLA law prof who supports gay marriage, once wrote that one of the key goals of the gay rights movement is to punish and marginalize people who in private life hold views they see as anti-gay. I'm working on a column for Sunday in which I discuss why it's in the interest of prudent social conservatives and prudent gay rights activists to come to some sort of settlement that would allow for gay marriage while establishing a zone of protection of religious liberty around religious institutions, for the sake of religious freedom. But I fear that the gay rights movement isn't interested in that -- that it's only interested in crushing its enemies. The blacklisting of the Mormon director is a very bad sign.

These morons have incorrectly and stupidly connected the dots. People with disordered minds and high risk, unnatural behavior covet what they cannot have. As a result they mock marriage. Maybe they do not realize that because they are insane and unnatural. Forty-eight percent of the people of California have been so dumbed-down by moral relativism that they do not see the next step or dangers to all of us when you allow the mocking of marriage, the cornerstone of our culture. Fools, all!

19 posted on 11/15/2008 4:09:38 AM PST by olezip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Freedom cannot be tolerated. It’s frequently attacked by zealots.


21 posted on 11/15/2008 5:25:06 AM PST by popdonnelly (Don't lose sight of your conservative principles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I’t’s called “rainbowlisting” though “Lavenderlisting” or “pinklisting” sound better. A freeper coined rainbowlisting the other day, I’ll look back through my comments and find his name so I can give him proper credit.


22 posted on 11/15/2008 5:25:27 AM PST by Mr. Silverback ("[Palin] has not even lived in the Lower 48 since 1987. Come on! Really!" --Polybius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Unless your business is in West Hollywood or the Castro district of San Francisco, this is hardly anything to worry about.


27 posted on 11/15/2008 10:26:57 AM PST by dbz77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

So let me see if I understand?

Liberals are not happy with the result of the recent election, and demand the result be changed?...

;)


28 posted on 11/15/2008 10:31:08 AM PST by Cringing Negativism Network (PALIN 2012: No more RINOS... Ever!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Yes, they seek to destroy the churches, imho. And any other conservatives who disagree with them. They will stop at nothing, I believe, nor will any concessions be enough.

Satan hates the cross.


29 posted on 11/15/2008 12:07:59 PM PST by bboop (Stealth Tutor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson