Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Was Leo Donofrio's case fast tracked at SCOTUS today?!? Emergency review like Bush V. Gore?
Natural Born Citizen Blog - Leo Donofrio ^ | 11-20-2008 | Leo C. Donofrio

Posted on 11/20/2008 8:10:27 PM PST by Frantzie

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 381-400401-420421-440441-452 last
To: BP2

A lot of GREAT observations there! (I hope Zman saw your post to me, since he’s the guy who’s a tad off base here!)

Sometimes I think people like Zman DO think the Constitution is like a Chinese menu — some from column A, some from column B, etc. People do that with the Bible, too — pick out the parts they want to observe, and disregard all else.


441 posted on 11/22/2008 7:07:45 AM PST by MayflowerMadam (We have elected a man ... who has never run so much as a Dairy Queen. - Dollard post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 431 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

Which department does Secretary of State Thornburgh head? Having a Secretary of State, I would think, necessitates a Department of State. But ... I’m not from Kansas ...


442 posted on 11/22/2008 8:41:38 AM PST by so_real
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 440 | View Replies]

To: PA-RIVER

Good job. You may want to pirnt it out and mail it to Leo’s P.O. Box. If you want his P.O. box - I can send you a in email if I can find it.

His web site is down because it is being attacked.

They are very worried about Leo. The NJ supreme court changed his filing to try to sabotage his case. Why would people do this unless his case will blow someone out of the water.


443 posted on 11/22/2008 9:22:02 AM PST by Frantzie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 439 | View Replies]

To: so_real
Having a Secretary of State, I would think, necessitates a Department of State.

We have a Secretary of State's office. We don't have a Department of State.

444 posted on 11/22/2008 2:49:47 PM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 442 | View Replies]

To: BonRad
Are you saying this is new misconduct?

That even though this case is now filed correctly at the USSC and is set for conference, it will still not be decided on correctly because of how the NJ APPELLATE DIVISION has written it up?

As you can tell I am not a lawyer. So sorry if I misunderstood.

I understand as of now the SC clerk filed it correctly and is set for conference.

But the NJ Appellate Division has mucked up the process so this case will fail as of now because of sabotage?

If this is new info and not corrected as of yet, how can we Freepers help correct this?

445 posted on 11/22/2008 2:54:21 PM PST by Aurorales
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 438 | View Replies]

To: Aurorales
SEE http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2136532/posts?page=1 THIS SEEMS TO BE BEST EFFORT AT A COALESCED “LIVE” THREAD (numerous participants from those below may be enjoining to keep this thread prominent I listings-I COUNT 14 THREADS STARTED ON THURS-FRI-SAT / NOV 20-22): Posted: Nov.21.2008 @ 8:25 pm | Lasted edited: Nov.21.2008 @ 8:25 pm Donofrio Alleges Judicial Misconduct, Obstruction of Justice, NJ Appellate Division Today, Leo Donofrio, also the Plaintiff in Donofrio v. Wells, is separately filing an official allegation of Judicial Misconduct against Appellate Division Judge Jack M. Sabatano. Leo will be updating his blog with the official complaint, and I’ll update here as well… Today, Leo C. Donofrio filed, with the NJ Supreme Court’s Advisory Committee on Judicial Conduct, an official allegation of Judicial Misconduct against Appellate Division Judge Jack M. Sabatino with regard to the initial stage of this litigation which was originally filed in the NJ Superior Court, Appellate Division. The case, having come directly from an appeal to the New Jersey Supreme Court is now before the the United States Supreme Court, “DISTRIBUTED for Conference of December 5, 2008″ before all nine Supreme Court Justices. I am very concerned that if the United States Supreme Court requests the official records of the case from the NJ Appellate Division, a fraudulent case file - not including all relevant documents - will be forwarded to the SCOTUS and thereby the case now pending might be jeopardized. A copy of the official complaint - by way of a New Jersey Supreme Court generated form - will be uploaded to this blog shortly.
446 posted on 11/22/2008 6:58:54 PM PST by BonRad (As Rome goes so goes the world)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 445 | View Replies]

To: BonRad

Thank you for pointing my way to the new thread.

Pulling my hair out over this.
I guess you can’t have smooth sailing when trying to stop a government takeover.


447 posted on 11/22/2008 11:37:04 PM PST by Aurorales
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 446 | View Replies]

To: Aurorales

NEW THREAD LINK AGAIN:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/2136532/posts?q=1&;page=201#201


448 posted on 11/23/2008 7:45:31 AM PST by seekthetruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 447 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I live one block from the edge of the ‘hood.


449 posted on 11/23/2008 3:09:19 PM PST by gospelmidi (BUILD THE FENCE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: TheZMan
See above.

See what? Doesn't look like your "argument" survived the moderator.

And btw, the Constitution needs to trump whatever your feelings of "dangerousness" are.

450 posted on 11/24/2008 7:14:25 AM PST by Paul Ross (Ronald Reagan-1987:"We are always willing to be trade partners but never trade patsies.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie
When will our consrvative AM talk show “heroes” going to grow a pair and start talking about this?

When will "W"?

451 posted on 11/24/2008 7:16:55 AM PST by Paul Ross (Ronald Reagan-1987:"We are always willing to be trade partners but never trade patsies.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross

Freepers, Please listen to Lan Lamphere’s program from last night. It is being repeated now, and will be repeated through the day today, 11/26 Very Interesting, and you need to hear it. I believe Lan is telling the truth. http://www.lanlamphere.com/public/


452 posted on 11/26/2008 5:42:06 AM PST by seekthetruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 451 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 381-400401-420421-440441-452 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson