Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Abolish the Fed
Ron Paul News ^ | 2008-11-28 | Paul-Martin Foss

Posted on 11/28/2008 11:39:29 PM PST by rabscuttle385

Remarks delivered at the End the Fed rally in Washington, DC, November 22, 2008, across the street from the headquarters of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors.

Welcome, and thank you all for braving the cold weather to make it out here to today's rally. My name is Paul-Martin Foss, and I am representing the office of US Congressman Ron Paul. Like many people in this country, I made it all the way through college without any knowledge at all of economics. While preparing for grad school, I began taking economics courses at George Mason University, where I received my first exposure to Ludwig von Mises, Murray Rothbard, and the Austrian School of economics. Through my study of Austrian economics, I grew aware of the grave danger posed to this country by the Federal Reserve.

Many of you here are undoubtedly familiar with the workings of the Federal Reserve, but for those of you who may be here out of curiosity, I will give a brief description of the Fed. Created in 1913, the Federal Reserve System is a government-chartered but privately owned national banking monopoly, with a presidentially-appointed Board of Governors, headquartered across the street. The Fed issues the paper currency we use in day-to-day transactions, which currency is given legal tender status. The Fed influences market interest rates by making purchases of Treasury bonds, mortgage-backed securities, and other assets on the open market, attempting to keep interest rates at a certain targeted level. It acts as a lender of last resort to failing banks, offering money through its discount window. It engages in currency swap operations with foreign central banks. It serves as a clearinghouse and regulator for the banks in its system. And, as we have seen over the past several months, it increasingly operates as the guarantor of the stability of the entire American financial system.

Because of its hybrid government/private nature, decisions regarding monetary policy are not subject to effective oversight. The Federal Open Market Committee, a government-created committee, makes monetary policy decisions, which are then implemented by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, a private institution. For the past few decades, based on Keynesian thinking, the Fed has been tasked by Congress with maintaining full employment and a stable price level. However, a cursory examination of money supply and price level data shows that the Fed has failed miserably in that regard.

Inflation is an increase in the supply of money, and the effect of inflation, all other things being equal, is a rise in prices. Something that cost one dollar only 10 years ago would cost $1.32 today. And that is based on the official data published by the Fed, the accuracy of which over the past 25 years is subject to dispute, since price level data has been manipulated to produce lower inflation numbers in order to conceal the true damage of inflation from the American people. Looking at the long term, over the 95-year history of the Federal Reserve System the dollar has lost 95 percent of its value. Any company that had mismanaged its assets in such a manner would have gone out of business long ago.

Inflation has two very pernicious effects, the first being that it benefits debtors and punishes savers, since debtors are able to repay their debts with devalued dollars. Thrift is punished because savings see their purchasing power eroded every year. The second effect of inflation is that those who receive new money first are able to purchase assets before prices rise, while those who receive the money last have had to deal with high prices before receiving the benefit of the new money.

Who are the largest debtors in this country? The federal government, of course, with a national debt quickly approaching $11 trillion, but also large finance companies and corporations such as General Motors, General Electric, and Lehman Brothers, because of the preferential tax treatment afforded to debt financing over equity financing.

Who receives newly inflated money first? The federal government, the Federal Reserve, major national banks, and government contractors. It is no surprise then that those who benefit the most from inflation are those who collude to continue the cycle of inflation, weakening the dollar and raising prices. The rich get richer, and the middle class and the poor grow poorer.

The Fed's manipulation of interest rates creates the boom-and-bust business cycle that we have become all too accustomed to in this country. At present we find ourselves moving toward the bottom of a particularly destructive business cycle. Our policymakers unfortunately do not understand the role of the Fed in the creation of business cycles. Instead of ending the Fed's manipulation of interest rates, the Fed is encouraged to embed itself ever deeper in the economy, involving itself in bailouts, creating new lending facilities, and acting as the guarantor of financial market stability. Until the Fed ceases its loose monetary policy, there will be no economic correction. There may be short-term improvements in the economy, but once the Fed's policy tools are shown to be ineffective, the end result will be a cataclysmic economic depression.

Recently the Fed has been heavily involved with the actions surrounding the Wall Street bailout, injecting trillions of dollars of credit into the financial system. Reserve bank credit is up almost 150% over the past two months, while the monetary base has increased 75% in that same time frame. If the people across the street don't get their act in gear, this country could face a hyperinflationary crisis the likes of which has not been seen in the First World since Germany in the 1920s. You all have undoubtedly seen photographs of people filling their wheelbarrows with paper bills in order to go grocery shopping. Well, I have two wheelbarrows already, so I'm ahead of the curve.

Since we know what the problem is, how do we fix it? To address the Fed's shortcomings, Dr. Paul has introduced a number of legislative proposals.

HR 2754, the Sunshine in Monetary Policy Act, would force the Fed to republish M3, the broadest measure of money supply, which would allow a more accurate gauge of potential price inflation. Reporting of M3 was suspended in early 2006, as M3 was beginning to increase at an ever-faster rate. How convenient that the broadest measure of money supply was dropped as the housing boom began to bust, and not long before the turmoil in financial markets began.

HR 2756, the Honest Money Act, would repeal federal legal tender laws. Why should worthless, unbacked paper issued by a private banking monopoly have legal tender status? With legal tender laws in place, bad money forces out good. Our Founding Fathers intended for gold and silver to act as money, not unbacked paper.

In the next Congress, Dr. Paul will be introducing a bill to audit the Federal Reserve. The Fed currently is audited by GAO, but there are certain areas of Fed activity that GAO is forbidden from auditing. These include, and I quote here from US Code:

Well, if you can't audit any of those areas, what is left to audit? These unauditable areas comprise the core methods through which the Fed distorts the proper functioning of the market. Why should transactions with foreign governments or foreign central banks be free from legal scrutiny and oversight? What is to keep the Federal Open Market Committee, a majority of whose members are presidential appointees, from siphoning funds to politically connected firms? What other agency of government receives such carte blanche to operate completely independently, spending money willy-nilly and entering into agreements with foreign governments, without any oversight? Were this the Department of Defense or Department of State, we would rightly categorize it as a rogue agency. To fully reign in the Fed there is only one solution.

That brings us to the last, but not least, piece of legislation, HR 2755, the Federal Reserve Board Abolition Act. This bill would repeal the Federal Reserve Act and abolish the Federal Reserve Board of Governors and the entire Federal Reserve System. Everything I have just described shows that Fed is unaccountable, unconstitutional, and contrary to every principle upon which this country was founded. Until the Federal Reserve System is abolished, true freedom and prosperity will elude us.

It is incumbent upon us to educate ourselves and to spearhead educational efforts, to speak to family, friends, and coworkers, to get the word out about the Fed, what it is, what it does, and its detrimental effect on the financial standing of this country and its people. I've managed to convince my parents of the Fed's destructiveness, and it never ceases to amaze me how many people we talk to who have at least some knowledge of the Fed's destructive power. We are not alone, and we need to ensure that our Congressmen know that. Educational websites, Meetup groups, and rallies need to result in a flood of letters, phone calls, and emails to Congressional offices, lobbyists, and think tanks. Congressmen and their staffers need to know that the Fed should be reined in and abolished, and that the legislation to accomplish that already exists. Official Washington needs to understand that we know what the Fed does, and we're fed up. Freedom is not easy, and it requires an educated, active, and aware populace. It won't happen quickly, it won't happen easily, but once it does, the groundswell of opposition will ensure a real change. The Fed must go. End the Fed.

Paul-Martin Foss [Paul-Martin.Foss@mail.house.gov] works on Capitol Hill in monetary affairs.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Editorial; Government; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: bailout; bernanke; biggovernment; depression; economy; fed; federalreserve; financialcrisis; hyperinflation; inflation; lp; nwo; panicof2008; paulson; recession; ronpaul
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

1 posted on 11/28/2008 11:39:30 PM PST by rabscuttle385
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: PAR35; TigerLikesRooster; bamahead; AndyJackson; Thane_Banquo; nicksaunt; MadLibDisease; ...

The Money, Banking, and Financial Markets Ping List.

"Money, not morality, is the principle commerce of civilized nations."
—Thomas Jefferson

FR Keywords: moneylist, bankinglist, financelist

Please tag all relevant threads with the aforementioned keywords.

This can be a very high-volume ping list at times.

Ping list jointly pinged by rabscuttle385 and TigerLikesRooster.

To join the ping list:
FReepmail rabscuttle385 with the subject line add  moneylist.
(Stop getting pings by sending the subject line drop moneylist.)


2 posted on 11/28/2008 11:40:28 PM PST by rabscuttle385 ("If this be treason, then make the most of it!" —Patrick Henry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Ike; RSmithOpt; jiggyboy; 2banana; Travis McGee; OwenKellogg; 31R1O; Ken H; Gritty; ...
*Ping!*
3 posted on 11/28/2008 11:41:05 PM PST by rabscuttle385 ("If this be treason, then make the most of it!" —Patrick Henry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bamahead; traviskicks

Libertarian ping!


4 posted on 11/28/2008 11:41:44 PM PST by rabscuttle385 ("If this be treason, then make the most of it!" —Patrick Henry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

I second the motion. But you can not print up gold or silver. How will they bail out the world?


5 posted on 11/28/2008 11:42:43 PM PST by screaminsunshine (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385
The gold standard only works if you are willing to give control of our currency to the gold mine owners. If they mine a lot the value goes down. If they mine a bit the value goes up. I am not willing to give that kinda power to them. It leaves me to wonder however, who we should give it to? Bernake? Paulson? The gold miners? I don't like any of the above choices.
6 posted on 11/28/2008 11:45:00 PM PST by Dawnsblood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

here are the videos:

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=3qsJjTaekA8

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=BWYRaiq4aTs&feature=related

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=i0wlekeM5lw&feature=related

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=OJm_70FYiMo&feature=related


7 posted on 11/28/2008 11:48:21 PM PST by syl799
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

End The Fed Rally Updates from Around the Country:

http://www.dailypaul.com/node/67323


8 posted on 11/28/2008 11:49:21 PM PST by syl799
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

End The Fed Rally Updates from Around the Country:

http://www.dailypaul.com/node/67323


9 posted on 11/28/2008 11:49:21 PM PST by syl799
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

Except not everybody wants to carry gold.


10 posted on 11/29/2008 12:08:38 AM PST by wastedyears ("Al Gore is an apostle of arrogance." - Vaclav Klaus, Pres. of Czech Republic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dawnsblood
The gold standard only works if you are willing to give control of our currency to the gold mine owners. If they mine a lot the value goes down.

Nope. The price of gold regulates mining activity. Mining for gold is expensive and the price has to be high to make it worthwhile for all but the most efficient producers. There is never more than a minute increase in the total gold supply each year. Why would using gold as money make any difference in gold mining? Gold is very valuable now and every bit of mining that can profitable be done is already being done.

11 posted on 11/29/2008 12:32:22 AM PST by SeeSharp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

Agree completely.....the details can be argued about later.

I have to say though, I can’t think of a worse time to call for this (while the Congress and Administration are busy plundering the wealth of the people of the United States). Recalls the saying “too little, too late”. I wonder how many “Ron Pauls” in the House it would have taken to stop this nonsense (bailouts)? Further, how many in the House and Senate to over-ride a Presidential veto of a bill abolishing the Fed? Is it even possible without a coup?


12 posted on 11/29/2008 12:56:23 AM PST by Khepri (NEO-STALIN FASCIST DEFEATS NEO-LIBERAL MAOIST!! How's that working for yah?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385
There was no Federal Reserve during the panic of 1873. 
Abolishing the Fed is not a perfect solution but I would get rid of these useless over paid shits tomorrow if I could

Four months ago our Federal debt was 10 trillion
Since then under Paulson's direction we have piled on another 8 trillion.
This is beyond comprehension
The sub prime mess is worth one trillion so is relatively containable
Blame Wall St and their derivatives and credit default swaps for the other 7 trillion in bailouts
Blame the Fed for not clamping down on derivatives
Quite the contrary, Allen Greenspan loved derivatives.
He loved their ability to hedge against risks
So what use is the Fed?
They stood by while this derivatives mess mounted>
Fire their asses and let them flip hamburgers, they are beyond useless, they are malignant
13 posted on 11/29/2008 1:16:25 AM PST by dennisw (Never bet on Islam! ::::: Never bet on a false prophet!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeeSharp
I guess I do not understand. It seems to me that if the miners find a lot of gold then the worth of a currency pegged to it would go down. Supply and demand right? The same would happen in the other direction yes? I have been studying a bit on my off time lately and that is the process explained by Ms Fawcett in a book named “Political Economy For Beginners”. It seems to make sense to me. As Gold finds in Australia and the US (in the late 1800’s) picked up, the worth of the Pound went down. At the same time the value of currency in India and in China (based on silver) fluctuated according to the amount of silver the UK provided in trade. It seems to make a lot of sense to me. BTW it was so interesting to me to read a book that referred to Gov outlays in the millions rather than the trillions:) I am in the middle of Mr Hazlitts’s “Economics in One Lesson”. FA Hayek and HL Mencken wrote well of it, so maybe I'll figure it out :)
14 posted on 11/29/2008 3:46:20 AM PST by Dawnsblood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Dawnsblood
Here is an essay by Hayak on the subject: A Free-Market Monetary System. The problem of what to do if there s a big gold or silver strike has been dealt with before. It turns out the only thing that needs to be done is to stop minting coins for a while. Then the existing coins will begin to trade at values above their metal content. When the specie price stabilizes minting can begin again. That may not seem intuitive until you consider that base metal coins (tokens) trade at values above their metal content. When necessary silver coins can do so as well. Specie coins only trade at the specie price as long as minting is going on.
15 posted on 11/29/2008 4:14:14 AM PST by SeeSharp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: wastedyears
Except not everybody wants to carry gold.

They wouldn't have to. A gold standard simply means that whatever currency you have is fully redeemable in gold (or silver). You'd still carry paper bank notes and credit cards.

16 posted on 11/29/2008 4:18:41 AM PST by SeeSharp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

I agree, and while we’re at it abolish the Department of Education, early voting in national elections, all forms of gun control, funding to ACORN, PBS, NPR, the arts.


17 posted on 11/29/2008 4:22:03 AM PST by stockpirate (nothing will preserve (liberty) but ..force. ..you give up that force, you are inevitably ruined PH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeeSharp
Thank you for the link. I have bookmarked it and will read it later. This is a subject I am just introducing myself to. I am looking forward to learning a bit. Hayak is a favorite of mine :)
18 posted on 11/29/2008 4:24:09 AM PST by Dawnsblood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: screaminsunshine
"How will they bail out the world?"

Especially since we no longer have J.P. Morgan (the big man) to pull everyone together to resolve a fiscal crisis.

It is time and long past time to CUT Federal spending. The influence of the governments spending and tinkering with the economy disturbs the natural economic cycle.

19 posted on 11/29/2008 4:36:03 AM PST by Jimmy Valentine (DemocRATS - when they speak, they lie; when they are silent, they are stealing the American Dream)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

interesting read.


20 posted on 11/29/2008 6:47:17 AM PST by traviskicks (http://www.neoperspectives.com/Ron_Paul_2008.htm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson