Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: trumandogz
I don't buy that argument, either. His place of birth is important. If he were born in Hawaii, he's a natural-born U.S. citizen. In the United States, citizenship is by location, not blood.
36 posted on 12/16/2008 5:36:13 PM PST by GAB-1955 (Kicking and Screaming into the Kingdom of Heaven! (USCG Aux))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: GAB-1955

Native born is geographic. Natural born is allegiance based and can be based upon blood line as child of citizens no matter location of birth.


46 posted on 12/16/2008 5:45:57 PM PST by arrogantsob (Hero vs Zero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

To: GAB-1955
In the United States, citizenship is by location, not blood.

Actually, US citizenship laws recognize citizenship arising both by location of birth and by blood. A child born to two illegals in LA is a natural-born citizen, as is a child born to an American citizen living overseas (with some restrictions to both methods of acquiring citizenship, of course).

160 posted on 12/17/2008 8:22:39 AM PST by Citizen Blade (What would Ronald Reagan do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson