Posted on 01/03/2009 7:01:24 AM PST by dascallie
Last night Ed Hale presented the (heretofore, unseen) divorce decree on Plains Radio between Obama's mother and Obama Sr ( her FIRST marriage).
The key bonus in this was the revelation of the specific version of her name in the decree, Stanley Ann D. Obama.
Using this precise name variation ( the abbreviated, initial "D" --instead of 'Dunham', was the cipher that broke open the search), they are claiming to have now located a POE (Port of Entry ) document that Obama's mother provided when she returned to the US with her son--soon after Obama's birth, (allegedly in Kenya).
The POE allegedly includes Obama's birth information/certificate ( British Kenya) as required for entry. Stay tuned for events...see other comments below. -------------------------------------------------- DesertVet Newbie
Posts: 11 Re: Obama-Dunham 1964 DIVORCE DECREE Forthcoming « Reply #53 on: January 02, 2009, 09:39:16 PM » ***********Stanley Ann D. Obama*************
No secret I've been highly skeptical on this whole ordeal. I'm now beginning to think this could very well lead the way to the smoking gun. Until this document she has only been known as "Dunham", no where in public records has Obama's Mothers name read as it does on this divorce decree. I believe the "D" being abreviated has allowed them to locate her records. This has led them to a "port of entry" birth certificate for Barack Obama. She submitted this POE certificate when she came back to the US, and the fact that there is a POE Certificate...proves that he was indeed born out of the country.
This would mean that Obama has never been through Immigration & Naturalization Services in his life, he became a citizen of Indonesia, and never applied for a U.S. passport. If this is the case, then he's not even a citizen, let alone a natural born citizen.
I'm not 100% certain on my assertion of above take on this document issue, but I think it is HIGHLY plausible. I'm still not ready to dance in the streets by any means yet (Yeah, I'm a tough sell). But I am quite intriguied at the moment. Couldn't say that earlier today.
http://wikitravel.org/en/Mecca
WARNING: Non-Muslims are strictly prohibited from entering the holy city of Mecca. The penalty is deportation from the country. Documentation will be checked upon entry and anyone not showing proof of being Muslim will be denied entry. As a solitary exception, the Mecca bus terminal (outside city limits) is open to all.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_Saudi_Air_Force
The RSAF maintains the third largest fleet of F-15’s after the USAF and the JASDF.
I hate using Wiki for a source, But, it was quick.
Under what rules of Senate procedure is it their job to do so, and what citizenship papers would Obama have presented as part of that process, should such process actually exist?
In 1981, about two years after the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan, the United States provided General Zia-ul-Haq, Pakistan's military ruler, with $3.2 billion in loans and grants. The idea was to elicit Pakistan's help in ousting the Soviets from Afghanistan. Included in this package, at Pakistan's insistence, were 40 F-16 aircraft.
http://www.newsweek.com/id/149257
As a Catholic I cannot go to Mecca but I can and have gone to Saudi Arabia.
I have been there as well.
CERTIFICATE OF ELECTION FOR SIXYEAR TERM
To the President of the Senate of the United States:
This is to certify that on the __ day of __, 19_, A__ B__ was duly chosen by the qualified electors of the State of __ a Senator from said State to represent said State in the Senate of the United States for the term of six years, beginning on the 3d day of January, 19__.
Did you break the law when you entered The Kingdom?
No, but I traveled on military orders and was restricted to base. Same with every other US mil member except the Base Commander and staff.
We oilfield folk have a bit more freedom in the Kingdom but we have to play by their rules. As far as places to go for work, Saudi is not one of my favorites.
????
There is no way an honest man, a man who respects the Country and it’s constitution, a man who respects oaths, a man who respects the wisdom of prior generations, a man who cares at all for the future generations could TAKE the oath of office when his qualifications remain uninspected and disputed. An honest man would see this as a dereliction of duty and would require all of this be clarified before he took office. An honest man would bring his eligibity issues into the light for honest, upfront and open debate.
So says the one confused at noon.
You are very wrong ! To be a “natural born citizen” it requires you have “both” parents be US citizens at the time of birth. And only a ‘natural-born’ citizen is eligible to hold the office of President...you all need to brush up on your knowledge of the constitution.
i suggest, www.americangrandjury.org and reading the constituton which you can google on your own..if you’re serious about remaining free in this country.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.