Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama going to pot?
One News Now ^ | 1/6/2009 | James L. Lambert

Posted on 01/10/2009 1:17:51 PM PST by IbJensen

Esquire magazine recently reported that representatives from Barack Obama's administration team admit the president-elect will give strong consideration to decriminalizing marijuana by the end of his tenure in office.

Those remarks follow comments issued last summer by Rep. Barney Frank (D-Massachusetts), who introduced H.R. 5843 -- an act to remove federal penalties for the use of marijuana by "responsible adults." According to CNN, the liberal lawmaker "doesn't think it's the government's business to tell you how to spend your leisure time."

Lending the Esquire article additional credence is an interview with Obama, recorded in January 2004, during which the then-U.S. Senate candidate expressed interest in decriminalizing the personal use of pot. (See YouTube video)

As someone who is very much aware of how this drug has harmed so many people from my generation, I adamantly disagree with this "floating" proposal. The U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency lists marijuana as "a Schedule 1 controlled substance, meaning it has a high potential for abuse."

It's irresponsible for members of the incoming administration to float this idea and to send such a message to millions of young Americans -- although I'm sure many supporters of medical marijuana use would disagree. But I think they should reconsider. Currently more than 50 head shops in San Francisco act as fronts for marijuana distribution in that city. According to The O'Reilly Factor, these shops not only attract petty crime but other non-desirable activity as well.

Anyone who knows anything about drug abuse knows that marijuana has been a "gateway" drug for many of those who use and abuse hard narcotics. Many people are first exposed to that dark world through a few puffs of a supposedly "innocent" marijuana cigarette.

Marijuana desensitizes people -- and its everyday use makes people lazy and unproductive. And it's addictive! I have personally seen this substance harm friends from school days past. Perhaps that's why I am so upset that consideration would be given to decriminalizing its use.

Still, Congressman Frank garnered support from seven other Democratic House members in sponsoring his legislation. Included in that group was Rep. Barbara Lee from California's District 9 (Berkeley and Oakland). By voicing her support, Lee -- a member of the House Black Caucus -- made light of the recreational use of a drug that is destroying the lives of hundreds of her own constituents.

If Lee wants to act responsibly and do something constructive, she should target the drug dealers in her district who are irreparably damaging the lives of untold numbers of people. Ironically, though, Congresswoman Lee's tact is to say that present drug enforcement laws are "inhumane" and "immoral."

Similarly, if president-elect Obama wants to act responsibly, he should immediately retract this reckless proposal being "floated" by his advisors.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: agenda; barneyfrank; bho2008; hr5843; legalizeandregulate; legalizemarijuana; potheads; rats; taxandregulate; wod
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-109 next last
Those remarks follow comments issued last summer by Rep. Barney Frank (D-Massachusetts), who introduced H.R. 5843 -- an act to remove federal penalties for the use of marijuana by "responsible adults." ...

Barney the pervert delivers for the forces of evil once again.

What a disgustingly corrupt administration will be ruling our lives and putting the finishing touches on ruining our economy!

1 posted on 01/10/2009 1:17:51 PM PST by IbJensen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: IbJensen
by the end of his tenure in office.

Why wait/

Just to create an election year issue that attract the young and the listless to the voting booth, of course.

Cynical bastard.

2 posted on 01/10/2009 1:19:58 PM PST by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

3 posted on 01/10/2009 1:20:09 PM PST by Islander7 (This Atlas is shrugging! ~ I am Joe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

Meanwhile, they’re on the road to criminalizing tobacco, sugar, fat, fast food, and junk food.


4 posted on 01/10/2009 1:20:36 PM PST by LibFreeOrDie (Obama promised a gold mine, but he will give us the shaft.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

Barry can obey Soros’ Prime Directive if he wants but he will declare himself as frivolous in the eyes of the public if he does so.

“President O-bong-o” is not the sort of “branding” any administration should want to take on.


5 posted on 01/10/2009 1:21:49 PM PST by sinanju
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

George Soros wants to decriminalize drugs.


6 posted on 01/10/2009 1:22:12 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Is Big Jail-Prison going to allow it?


7 posted on 01/10/2009 1:23:08 PM PST by pepperhead (Kennedy's float, Mary Jo's don't!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

8 posted on 01/10/2009 1:23:57 PM PST by Vaquero ( "an armed society is a polite society" Robert A. Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

Unfortunately, there is no way Obama or any president and Congress will do this.


9 posted on 01/10/2009 1:24:08 PM PST by trumandogz (The Democrats are driving us to Socialism at I00 MPH -The GOP is driving us to Socialism at 97.5 MPH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Islander7

Photoshop is the best!

Can’t a brother get a smoke on, and drink on, and snack on. Chill my babies.


10 posted on 01/10/2009 1:28:47 PM PST by Big_Monkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

>>Why wait<<

I agree. I’ve got to have something to help make it through the next four years.

Legal, I might just go for it.


11 posted on 01/10/2009 1:29:48 PM PST by netmilsmom (Psalm 109:8 - Let his days be few; and let another take his office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

will employers be able to hire/fire on the basis of + urine drug screen in your idealized world of decriminalization ? Because of the persistence of the substance, it makes casual use and employment mutually exclusive.


12 posted on 01/10/2009 1:32:28 PM PST by gusopol3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen
Barney the pervert delivers for the forces of evil once again.

Pot is the forces of evil?

Really?

13 posted on 01/10/2009 1:36:39 PM PST by humblegunner (Where my PIE at, fool?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gusopol3

I believe in employment at will. Thus, an employer can fire someone for a failed drug test or for smoking Marlboros.

The legal status of pot has no bearing on such an employment decision.


14 posted on 01/10/2009 1:37:11 PM PST by trumandogz (The Democrats are driving us to Socialism at I00 MPH -The GOP is driving us to Socialism at 97.5 MPH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom

If it was legal, I probably would. Yet another reason I’m glad I don’t live in california.


15 posted on 01/10/2009 1:37:51 PM PST by ichabod1 (Change is not a destination, Hope is not a strategy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: gusopol3
will employers be able to hire/fire on the basis of + urine drug screen in your idealized world of decriminalization ?

No, but they will hire & fire on the basis of illiteracy.

Like not beginning a sentence with a capital letter.

16 posted on 01/10/2009 1:38:32 PM PST by humblegunner (Where my PIE at, fool?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

it does if a bus driver is + after an accident or a truck driver, or any other of a myriad of liability issues, just as with alcohol, a legal substance, which is relatively quickly cleared from the body.


17 posted on 01/10/2009 1:41:03 PM PST by gusopol3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

check your tag line, scholar.


18 posted on 01/10/2009 1:41:51 PM PST by gusopol3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen
decriminalizing marijuana by the end of his tenure

Why wait? Do it now. The drug war is a farce.
19 posted on 01/10/2009 1:42:12 PM PST by mysterio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

Rats know that once pot is legal, they can tax it.


20 posted on 01/10/2009 1:43:45 PM PST by Fresh Wind (Hey, Obama! Where's my check?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gusopol3

Yes, I understand that I can get high today and fail a drug test three weeks from now.


21 posted on 01/10/2009 1:45:07 PM PST by trumandogz (The Democrats are driving us to Socialism at I00 MPH -The GOP is driving us to Socialism at 97.5 MPH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen
"[Liberals don't] think it's the government's business to tell you how to spend your leisure time[.. er, except for listening to the radio.]"
22 posted on 01/10/2009 1:46:26 PM PST by WilliamofCarmichael (If modern America's Man on Horseback is out there, Get on the damn horse already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

so how can any employer with potential liability take a risk on you ?


23 posted on 01/10/2009 1:46:35 PM PST by gusopol3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

Given that employers ALREADY can refuse to hire a TOBACCO smoker and prohibit such activity even OFF company time away from company property, the decriminalization and possible legalization of dope still does not mean that all Americans would be permitted to use said substance (certainly if pilots and even stewardesses are prohibited from drinking, something like 24 hours before a flight), other job fields would employ the same standard.

But then, if you are a dope head, and want to lay on a couch all day, and concede that you can’t get a number of jobs because of the use of pot, then it will drop the unemployment rate by not SEEKING employment. Score one for Obamonics.


24 posted on 01/10/2009 1:47:13 PM PST by weegee (Obamunism, just another word for the policies of a NeoCom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mysterio; All

I agree.. Personally I think the Drug War has increased the Government ten fold..


25 posted on 01/10/2009 1:47:56 PM PST by KevinDavis (Thomas Jefferson: A little rebellion now and then is a good thing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Islander7

If you put that on a T-shirt, it would be gold. You could sell it to Dummies who love Barry, and Repubs who get the joke. It might even replace the ubiquitous and dumba$$ Che Guevera shirts that are now all the rage.


26 posted on 01/10/2009 1:48:23 PM PST by Big_Monkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen
Libetards will love Obama for doing that then and will put on their knee pads to worship the one. They will vote in droves like mindless zombies to support his reelection because he allowed them to smoke their fat doobies. And that will be the only reason, Obama will make such a move “at the end” of his administration, to secure reelection. And the doobie smoking idiots will reelect him.
27 posted on 01/10/2009 1:48:41 PM PST by utahson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

Heey, everything’s cool, man!

We told you it was Jeemy redux.


28 posted on 01/10/2009 1:48:43 PM PST by AmericanVictory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

“Like not beginning a sentence with a capital letter.”

Or addressing people as “DUDE!”;)


29 posted on 01/10/2009 1:49:51 PM PST by Frank_2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: gusopol3

They take a risk on us all.


30 posted on 01/10/2009 1:50:40 PM PST by trumandogz (The Democrats are driving us to Socialism at I00 MPH -The GOP is driving us to Socialism at 97.5 MPH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: gusopol3

Employers can NOW refuse to hire or maintain employment of workers using LEGAL substances. My wife works at a firm that tests potential and current employees for use of illegal drugs, plus tobacco and alcohol. A few years ago, they were trying to hire a tool and die maker and needed to reject several candidates before they could find one who hadn’t had a few beers over the weekend.


31 posted on 01/10/2009 1:50:48 PM PST by FFranco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: gusopol3
check your tag line, scholar.

A capital "C" can be made by striking both the shift key and "C" at the same time.

Try it! You can make grown-up letters like all the cool kids.

32 posted on 01/10/2009 1:53:13 PM PST by humblegunner (Where my PIE at, fool?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

some risks are defensible, this one is not.


33 posted on 01/10/2009 1:53:22 PM PST by gusopol3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz
Unfortunately, there is no way Obama or any president and Congress will do this.

Don't count on that. Did you think there was any way Bush would push through a 700 billion dollar bailout bill and that it would pass even though 90% of Americans of all races and political parties were against it?

Congress does what it does for money. If there is money in it they will do it when money gets tight no matter what the public thinks.
34 posted on 01/10/2009 1:55:11 PM PST by Arkinsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

I just want industrial hemp to be legalized.


35 posted on 01/10/2009 1:55:15 PM PST by Blood of Tyrants (Obama is living proof that stupid people should not be allowed to vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner
the apostrophe is found at the end of the row beginning with A, and i think you know about the S , scholar PERFESSER.
36 posted on 01/10/2009 1:56:11 PM PST by gusopol3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

The War on Drugs has been a complete failure — worse and longer than Prohibition.


37 posted on 01/10/2009 1:56:39 PM PST by AZLiberty (I hope Obama changes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

While Obama’s motives should always be suspect, clearly a FREERepublic should allow folks to be dopes if they so desire.

I fail to see how it is any worse than the much more immediately dangerous consumption of alcohol.


38 posted on 01/10/2009 1:57:41 PM PST by BuddhaBrown (Path to enlightenment: Four right turns, then go straight until you see the Light!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Big_Monkey

:-)


39 posted on 01/10/2009 1:57:46 PM PST by Islander7 (This Atlas is shrugging! ~ I am Joe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Cicero; IbJensen

>> George Soros wants to decriminalize drugs. <<

Me too. So did my two greatest intellectual heros, Milton Friedman and William Buckley.


40 posted on 01/10/2009 1:59:04 PM PST by Hawthorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen
Marijuana will be legal some day, because the many law students who now smoke pot will some day become Congressmen and legalize it in order to protect themselves. -Lenny Bruce, 1963
41 posted on 01/10/2009 1:59:17 PM PST by LouD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

The Communists are always happy to provide “the masses” with a way to keep their minds off of the misery of living in a corrupt Communist system. The Soviets used Vodka. I guess “pot” is just as good for use here.


42 posted on 01/10/2009 2:00:04 PM PST by FlingWingFlyer (CIA Director!....So easy, a caveman can do it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gusopol3
Again you fail to capitalize.

Perhaps "special education" might interest you.

Learning among your peers can only increase your hopes of literacy.

43 posted on 01/10/2009 2:00:45 PM PST by humblegunner (Where my PIE at, fool?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen; utahson
Those remarks follow comments issued last summer by Rep. Barney Frank (D-Massachusetts), who introduced H.R. 5843 -- an act to remove federal penalties for the use of marijuana by "responsible adults."

Where does the Constitution delegate to the feds the power to penalize individuals for marijuana possession, in your personal view?

44 posted on 01/10/2009 2:01:03 PM PST by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

A plant is a force of evil? A better example of a force of evil would be that of a government pretending to wage war against drugs when it really is using said war to add to its own power over its citizens. The militarization of police forces, no-knock raids, property seizure, etc. is not something that should be done to a supposedly free people.

I’m all for the decriminalization of marijuana. And no, I’ve never tried it.


45 posted on 01/10/2009 2:08:05 PM PST by kenth (Uhhhh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen

Once again, its people 0 can throw under the bus making those statements. If people go for it, he can claim it. If they don’t, he never said it.
We won’t hear 0 make any substantial remarks until he declares his dictatorship and he will probably focus group that too, just to be sure.


46 posted on 01/10/2009 2:11:46 PM PST by Steamburg ( Your wallet speaks the only language most politicians understand.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hawthorn; Cicero; IbJensen
"Me too. So did my two greatest intellectual heros, Milton Friedman and William Buckley."

Me three. And, as someone who has never smoked the ganga (career military officer), I don't think it's the government's business what you do in your own home.

I do have one caveat. If you are on public assistance, you should have to take and pass a random drug test. If you want to lay on the couch, baked all day long, have at it. On the other hand, if you want to be baked and then have the government reach their hand into MY pocket to pay for your habit, with that I have a problem.

47 posted on 01/10/2009 2:12:24 PM PST by Big_Monkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: IbJensen
I suspect that Zero will eventually decriminalize meth and crack. Once pot is old hat, people will want new toys. And Zero knows all about it.
48 posted on 01/10/2009 2:13:23 PM PST by jonrick46
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlingWingFlyer

Interesting point!


49 posted on 01/10/2009 2:15:29 PM PST by doberville
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: gusopol3

Pot is boring. At least legalize coke and gold razorblade necklaces. Now that would make Obama Cooooooool!


50 posted on 01/10/2009 2:15:40 PM PST by Holicheese (Get up Tom Brady, get up! PLEASE!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-109 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson