Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

IPD charges assistant scoutmaster with possessing child pornography
Copyright 2009 GateHouse Media, Inc. ^ | Posted Jan 23, 2009 @ 04:25 PM | By Linda Quinlan, staff writer

Posted on 01/24/2009 9:25:48 AM PST by Behind Liberal Lines

Irondequoit, N.Y. —Irondequoit police have charged an assistant Boy Scout leader of a troop in town with possessing an obscene sexual performance by a child, a felony.

Robert Casanzio, 19, of Irondequoit, was taken into custody Jan. 15 and also charged with attempted endangering the welfare of a child.

According to Sgt. Barry VanNostrand, supervisor of the IPD’s criminal investigations unit, Casanzio’s charges follow an approximately two-month long joint investigation by that unit and the Monroe County Sheriff’s Department.

Police allege that in October 2008, Casanzio placed a posting on Craig’s List Web site looking for “young teen naturists” and “young boys between the ages of 14 and 17” who would allow him to take nude pictures of them.

As a result of this investigation, VanNostrand said, Casanzio traveled to an undisclosed location for the purpose of meeting a 15 year old female to take nude photographs of her. When Casanzio arrived to meet the female to pick her up, he was met by investigators who took him into custody.

A subsequent search of Casanzio’s computer found more than 50 images of child pornography.

Nothing has been discovered so far in the investigation to indicate any of the images are of local children, VanNostrand said. He did say that Casanzio was an Assistant Scoutmaster of an Irondequoit troop of the Boy Scouts of America at the time he was charged.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; US: New York
KEYWORDS: homosexualagenda; pederast; perversion; queerrecruitment; sodomites
Boy, I can't see why those "narrow minded" Boy Scouts of America want to keep gays out of scouting... (rolls eyes)
1 posted on 01/24/2009 9:25:50 AM PST by Behind Liberal Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

“looking for “young teen naturists” and “young boys between the ages of 14 and 17” who would allow him to take nude pictures of them.”

Nope, gay men aren’t any threat whatsoever to young Boys Scouts. Why, the very thought casts the doubter as homophobic!

(extreme sarcasm)


2 posted on 01/24/2009 9:31:25 AM PST by Grunthor (Democracy: Theory that the common people know what they want and deserve to get it good and hard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

Jesse Dirkhising.
The name still brings sorrow-and anger-to my heart.


3 posted on 01/24/2009 9:38:07 AM PST by gimme1ibertee (Sarahlution!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines
possessing an obscene sexual performance by a child

I don't know how you can "possess" a "performance".

In any case, it's weird that he solicited young boys, but was caught chasing a girl.

If anybody thinks this is restricted to gays, they're wrong.

4 posted on 01/24/2009 9:42:35 AM PST by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

For those that don’t know, like me, this happened in New York State.


5 posted on 01/24/2009 9:47:58 AM PST by engrpat (End the National Nightmare on 1-20-2013)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne
If anybody thinks this is restricted to gays, they're wrong.

I don't think anyone is saying that. The issue, however, is that gay men are attracted to males. Boy scouts are males. It's too dangerous a combination.

For that matter, straight men shouldn't be girl scout troop leaders.

6 posted on 01/24/2009 9:49:32 AM PST by Behind Liberal Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: engrpat
For those that don’t know, like me, this happened in New York State.

Ummm....the first two words of the post are "Irondequoit, N.Y."

7 posted on 01/24/2009 9:51:11 AM PST by Behind Liberal Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

Sorry about that. Missed it.


8 posted on 01/24/2009 10:02:02 AM PST by engrpat (End the National Nightmare on 1-20-2013)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne
The pervert was charged with “possession” of child pornography (on his pc) which is a “performance”
9 posted on 01/24/2009 11:27:56 AM PST by DirtyHarryY2K ("yes we can" Not at my expense!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

“The issue, however, is that gay men are attracted to males. Boy scouts are males. It’s too dangerous a combination.”

No, gay men are attracted to adult men, straight men are attracted to adult women. If you are attracted to children you are a pedophile (whether you are gay or straight). Statistically, gay men are no more likely to be pedophiles than straight men. The reason for keeping gay men out of scouting has nothing to do with the a fear they will molest boys, but because they view gay men as not in keeping with their moral code, and the scouts have every right to do that. The scouts also won’t allow gay young men to become scouts.


10 posted on 01/24/2009 11:53:49 AM PST by yazoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: yazoo
What a load of misguided untruths!!! Homosexual activists routinely claim that most child molesters are “heterosexual” males, thus shifting the focus away from their own very high rates of molestation. Since 98-99% of the population is heterosexual, it is technically correct to say that most molestations are done by heterosexuals. However, statistics indicate that homosexuals pose a far more serious threat to children than do heterosexuals. In 1987, Dr. Stephen Rubin of Whitman College conducted a ten-state study of sex abuse cases involving school teachers. He studied 199 cases. Of those, 122 male teachers had molested girls, while 14 female teachers had molested boys. He also discovered that 59 homosexual male teachers had molested boys and four female homosexual teachers had molested girls. In other words, 32 percent of those child molestation cases involved homosexuals. Nearly a third of these cases come from only 1-2% of the population.

more here
http://www.traditionalvalues.org/urban/one.php

I was a scoutmaster and on council staff with the Boy Scouts of America for 11 years in NE Ohio. And can state that 100% of the child molestations and attempted molestations were in fact homosexual in nature.

11 posted on 01/24/2009 12:28:08 PM PST by sleddogs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: sleddogs

“I was a scoutmaster and on council staff with the Boy Scouts of America for 11 years in NE Ohio. And can state that 100% of the child molestations and attempted molestations were in fact homosexual in nature.”

Well obviously 100% if of the child molestations were in a boy scout troop it stands to reason they would be against boys. Pedophiles ideate on children not on gender. They are aroused by children based on the fact they are children. Some pedophiles prefer one gender or the other, and some molest both boys and girls. If you are a pedophile your sexual orientation is to children and the fact you are homosexual or heterosexual is not the issue. To assume that because a pedophile is also a homosexual is to link two things that aren’t necessarily related.

A very, very high percentage of pedophiles were sexually abused as children. Does this mean that the Scouts should deny membership to any adult who was abused a child, since it is a common thread among pedophiles?


12 posted on 01/24/2009 5:56:55 PM PST by yazoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: sleddogs

“I was a scoutmaster and on council staff with the Boy Scouts of America for 11 years in NE Ohio. And can state that 100% of the child molestations and attempted molestations were in fact homosexual in nature. “

Please tell me you’re joking. Considering the fact that it’s the BOY Scouts, then it’s pretty obvious that any molestations are going to involve people of the same gender.


13 posted on 01/24/2009 11:08:01 PM PST by NinoFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Behind Liberal Lines

This really has nothing to do with the ‘homosexual agenda’.


14 posted on 01/24/2009 11:14:15 PM PST by NinoFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ghost of Philip Marlowe; HogsBreath

ping


15 posted on 01/25/2009 7:47:57 AM PST by Behind Liberal Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: NinoFan

The Boy Scout aspect of the story most certainly does have everything to do with the homosexual agenda.


16 posted on 01/25/2009 7:58:06 AM PST by Ghost of Philip Marlowe (The people who cheered when OJ was acquitted are the same ones cheering now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: yazoo
Well, Yazoo, the point the poster was making is that 100% of the molestations were homosexual at root. The homosexuals claim that they should be scout masters because they would never harm children. The poster's comments indicate that the homosexual lobby is lying and that, by the poster's direct experience, homosexuals should not be allowed in the scouts.

Now listen, if you have children, and you want to put them in a ‘nature’ organization with people who may be attracted to them sexually (whether homo or hetero or pedophile at root), then go ahead and form your own organization that puts predators and prey together in the same group. Real smart.

As for the rest of us, leave the scouts alone so that there is at least one organization left in the country that respects God and does what it can to protect children and raise them with love of God, love of Biblical teachings, love of country, love of individual responsibility, and love of family.

17 posted on 01/25/2009 8:02:58 AM PST by Ghost of Philip Marlowe (The people who cheered when OJ was acquitted are the same ones cheering now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Ghost of Philip Marlowe

Look, I’m not someone who thinks that private organizations should be forced to admit people they don’t wish to admit. I’m very libertarian in that regard.

That having been said, I stand by my take that this story has little to do with homosexuals and everything to do with pedophiles. Whatever you think about homosexuality in general, the truth is that your average homosexual, if made a scout leader, is not going to molest anyone. Desires for people of the same sex and evil actions against underage persons are not the same thing.

Again, not trying to force the Boy Scouts to admit anyone they don’t want, just offering my take on this story.


18 posted on 01/25/2009 8:18:50 AM PST by NinoFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Ghost of Philip Marlowe

“As for the rest of us, leave the scouts alone so that there is at least one organization left in the country that respects God and does what it can to protect children and raise them with love of God, love of Biblical teachings, love of country, love of individual responsibility, and love of family.”

Please show me one place where I said the scouts should allow homosexual scout leaders. In fact, in one posting I noted I felt the scouts have every right to exclude homosexuals based on their moral philosophy. The scouts have never argued they don’t allow homosexuals because they are afraid of molestation. They have always argued they excluded them based on their moral stand. I am arguing a point about facts not about what we’d like to believe about the issue of who molests children.

If you think excluding homosexuals from scouts stops molestation of boy scouts you need to take your blinders off. Any group that mixes boys and adult males is bound to attract men who have sexual predation in mind. Boy scouts do get molested by scout masters even with the rules against homosexuals. I two adult men who were molested by scout masters when they were in scouts, and in both cases the scout masters were married with children. Child molesters are all too often pillars of the community.


19 posted on 01/25/2009 8:41:18 AM PST by yazoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: yazoo

If you think excluding homosexuals from scouts stops molestation of boy scouts you need to take your blinders off.

If you think that allowing homosexuals (who are open about their homosexuality and therefore acknowledging that their sexual orientation is of greater importance than being a scout leader) is a good idea and that parents should feel safe leaving their children in their trust, then you are the one who needs to take the blinders off.


20 posted on 01/25/2009 11:15:49 AM PST by Ghost of Philip Marlowe (The people who cheered when OJ was acquitted are the same ones cheering now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

ping


21 posted on 01/25/2009 1:24:43 PM PST by Behind Liberal Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: yazoo

A high percentage of homosexuals were molested as children. Gay men want to be cub scout leaders so they can molest little boys and recruit them into their sodomite perversion. Fags aren’t born that way, they’re made that way.


22 posted on 01/25/2009 1:30:43 PM PST by Tailgunner Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Tailgunner Joe

“Gay men want to be cub scout leaders so they can molest little boys and recruit them into their sodomite perversion.”

No, pedophiles want to be cub scout leaders so they can molest little boys. I doubt they care one way or another what the child turns out to be when he grows up. If they did they wouldn’t be molesting them in the first place. in any case, plenty of kids in scouts get molested by men with families of their own, so apparently this effort to keep homosexuals out isn’t the sole answer.


23 posted on 01/25/2009 3:39:33 PM PST by yazoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Ghost of Philip Marlowe

“If you think that allowing homosexuals (who are open about their homosexuality and therefore acknowledging that their sexual orientation is of greater importance than being a scout leader) is a good idea and that parents should feel safe leaving their children in their trust, then you are the one who needs to take the blinders off.”

Please go back and read my posts and find one place where I said letting homosexuals be scout leaders is a good idea. If you can find it I will contribute 100 dollars to FR. I think the scouts have their own specific moral code and it doesn’t include homosexuality. Therefore they have every right to exclude homosexuals. I have found nowhere in literature about this issue where the Scouts have ever claimed they keep homosexuals out because they fear molestation. They have ALWAYS said it was about their moral views.


24 posted on 01/25/2009 3:43:21 PM PST by yazoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: yazoo
Yazoo, I'm not referring to you specifically.

My point has been, and is, that a gay man may make a great scout master. But as soon as that man reveals he is gay, then he announces that his orientation, and having others accept his orientation, are his top priorities.

If I were homosexual and really wanted to serve in the military, I wouldn't announce my homosexuality. When I do, what I'm saying is that I want to be a “gay soldier,” that is, I hyphenated my priorities.

A man who announces his homosexuality and then tries to become a scout leader, will almost definitely try to indoctrinate the troops, either explicitly or implicitly. The strategy of planting funny, lovable gay men as background characters in sitcoms since the 80’s was done so with the effect of stealthily winning support and acceptance of homosexuals. I don't think we can deny how militant they've become since then.

All I was saying was that the scouts have a right and duty to be employ close scrutiny in selecting scout leaders, and that those who announce their hyphenated loyalties should do so at the risk of being denied.

So, I didn't mean to imply “you” as in yazoo, but as in the general public who put the scouts down for being selective.

25 posted on 01/25/2009 5:38:07 PM PST by Ghost of Philip Marlowe (The people who cheered when OJ was acquitted are the same ones cheering now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Ghost of Philip Marlowe

“All I was saying was that the scouts have a right and duty to be employ close scrutiny in selecting scout leaders, and that those who announce their hyphenated loyalties should do so at the risk of being denied.”

And I agree with your entire post. I believe that is why the scouts have a right (as any other groups does) to decide what are the qualifications to be involved. No one has the right to ask a member if he is homosexual if no evidence exists he is. Should a person openly claim he is homosexual then I also believe there is an agenda and the scouts have a perfect right to claim it is contrary to their ethics, codes, whatever.


26 posted on 01/27/2009 1:00:14 PM PST by yazoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson