Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kanjorski vote tied to lack of GOP input (Dem who voted against "stimulus"
The Times-Tribune (Scranton PA) ^ | 1/30/09 | Borys Krawczeniuk

Posted on 01/30/2009 6:01:59 AM PST by Born Conservative

A failure by House Democratic leaders to allow bipartisan input into an $819 billion economic stimulus proposal was a key reason U.S. Rep. Paul E. Kanjorski said he voted against it this week.

Efforts to reach Mr. Kan-jorski, D-11, for comment were unsuccessful, but his office provided a copy of a statement he read on the House floor before the vote.

He said Republicans “raise a reasonable objection that they were not fully included” as the bill was drafted. Republicans echoed the complaint.

The stimulus bill passed 244-188. The Senate is taking up its version of the bill, and a compromise will be needed before President Barack Obama is asked to sign it.

Rep. Chris Carney, D-10, backed the bill, saying it was flawed but “provides real opportunities for economic expansion.” All the votes in favor were Democratic, but Mr. Kanjorski and 10 other Democrats voted no.

Mr. Kanjorski also suggested Congress hasn’t spent enough time on the bill. He also said the package includes too little for road, bridge and infrastructure repairs and construction, doesn’t provide enough help for retired or unemployed Americans, disproportionately favors large urban areas and provides no money for struggling municipalities.

Mr. Carney said the tax credits would benefit 4.4 million Pennsylvanians.

The bill invests significantly in rural broadband development and health care technologies, helps states with “much-needed transportation improvements” and contains more money for home heating.


TOPICS: Extended News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: economicstimulus; kanjorski; porkulus

1 posted on 01/30/2009 6:01:59 AM PST by Born Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative

Translation: Kanjorski knows the “stimulus” package is just a huge spending bill and doesn’t want the failure of the package to be owned exclusively by Democrats.


2 posted on 01/30/2009 6:04:29 AM PST by brownsfan (We are sooooo screwed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative

Kanjorski is a crook. He probably did not get something he wanted in the bill leading to his vote against it.


3 posted on 01/30/2009 6:05:12 AM PST by Erik Latranyi (Too many conservatives urge retreat when the war of politics doesn't go their way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative

If passed in the Senate, this big fat piece of garbage of a Bail Out will be around the neck of the Democrats. Sad to say but i hope this produces landslide (R) victories in many races up for grabs. I think this Dem was bright enough to see that this has disaster written all over it and he wants no part of it.


4 posted on 01/30/2009 6:07:30 AM PST by oust the louse (This Country now has a smelly BO problem.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Erik Latranyi

Agreed! He’s NE Pa’s version of Murtha!


5 posted on 01/30/2009 6:09:09 AM PST by Dr. Ursus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Erik Latranyi
" He probably did not get something he wanted in the bill leading to his vote against it."

DING! DING! DING! We have a winner.
6 posted on 01/30/2009 6:41:04 AM PST by Rebel_Ace (Tags?!? Tags?!? We don' neeeed no stinkin' Tags!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: brownsfan

Let me add to that. Kanjorski realizes that being tied to this decreases his chances at a 15th term in the 2010 election.


7 posted on 01/30/2009 6:51:21 AM PST by Born Conservative (Bohicaville: http://bohicaville.wordpress.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Born Conservative

Bipartisan opposition to this partisan boondoggle spending bill.

Ah, the political worm turns quickly does it not?


8 posted on 01/30/2009 7:26:09 AM PST by WOSG (Oppose the bailouts, boondoggles, big Government -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rebel_Ace

Mayor Lou should be representing the district!!!


9 posted on 01/30/2009 12:19:22 PM PST by CPT Clay (Drill ANWR, Personal Accounts NOW ,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson