Skip to comments.Who Killed JFK?
Posted on 02/04/2009 11:49:12 AM PST by patriotgal1787
Do you believe that the November 22, 1963 assassination of President John F. Kennedy was the result of shots fired by a lone assassin from the 6th floor of the Texas School Book Depository?
Or are you one of many who believe it was a conspiracy that involved the highest levels of our government?
The case is not closed regarding what actually happened on that fateful day.
The late President Gerald R. Ford, the last surviving member of the commission admitted that the CIA destroyed pertinent documents, covering up the investigation of the assassination, in a recently published book.
Tim Miller, the book publisher who helped author the text, believes there was a conspiracy and that Ford knew even more than he told his publisher and the world. Ford shares many other breath-taking admissions with the reader in this, his final book, written three years prior to his own death.
What did Ford say about the "single bullet theory," the Zapruder film, and Oliver Stones movie, JFK?
"Who killed John F. Kennedy?"
Tim Miller joins us to discuss tonight at 9 p.m. ET -- link to the show here.
There is a separate program merely dealing with Oswald's physical movements after the assassination. They didn't try to say he killed Kennedy or Tippett. They just put him in the various places and re-enacted what his movements would have been to see if it was physically possible. BTW the movements were possible.
Ah, Yes, the Grassy Knoll, the term probably started by the SS agents interviewed in the early UPI article stating they thought rapid gunfire came from there. Of course they changed their stories as I’m sure they were pressured to do. Though I think one of the closest to the president witnesses Jean Hill said she used the term that day too.
I’ve seen and read this early UPI article in a 11/22/63 Michigan newspaper that exists today!
***Ah, yes, the dreaded GRASSY KNOLL***
Does anyone believe his book about the JFK assassination and disbelieve his book about Bush?
***Bugliosi is an experienced criminal lawyer. He knows how to evaluate evidence. ***
I haven't read his Bush book, but he clearly is a victim of BDS.
I have read his JFK book. No book that size could be perfect, but it is the best most complete account of the case to be had. If you want to know what the evidence really is and what really happened, there's no better place to start.
Anyone who relies on the Mainstream Media wouldn't know about this. As they don't report on it. There is a wealth of information these people wrote about what they did.
There is a wealth of information of people who tried to tell the govt about the JFK assassination. It was discovered that they weren't accepting information. That's right!
Research about the Revele (not sure if that's exactly right) investigation about the Marseilles assassins hired through the mob for our intel (They would fit in good and looked more like Americans and could be disposed of. I believe there is an Men who Killed Kennedy segment on this where when the investigation was completed he tried to turn it over to the govt to verify and make official. They were not interested! Why?
There was a deaf mute who went to the authorities about activity on the Grassy Knoll, they weren't interested.
Look what happened to the mob leaders testifying at the House Committee on assassinations about it.
The book Regicide has photocopies of an intel ‘conference record’ listing the 20 or so people involved in the plot.
There were witnesses who complained to Garrison that the authorities would not accept their accounts.
The authorities took Jean Hill into custody that day and told her not to say a thing to anybody about the shot she saw from the Knoll.
Why weren't all the many Knoll witnesses not included in the official investigation?
This is the tip of the iceburg, there really needs to be an in-depth book listing all these accounts together.
***To accept the government, et al, had anything to do with the murder of Kennedy would require an untold number of people to, be involved, be knowledgable, and be able to keep a secret.***
Here's a good example of the garbage that has been published about this case. The author of Regicide, "Gregory Douglas", is a fraud and a forger.
How can this be? And anyone who supports the official line is truthful and so believable they don't even need to be checked out.
Reading the book Regicide stands on it's own, just by the way it's written and what's in it. There is much more info in it than just the conference record, and there are always names attached to that info. This makes the book worth at least checking out and researching a little. There are people who sware by it too, especially ppl in that community.
“The book Regicide has photocopies of an intel conference record listing the 20 or so people involved in the plot.”
***Here's a good example of the garbage that has been published about this case. The author of Regicide, “Gregory Douglas”, is a fraud and a forger.***
“Kennedy had issued an Executive order for the cease of Viet Nam and the immediate pull out.”
***This is not true. There is no such order.***
Like it or not, the document in Regicide is fake.
We do this every year around the third week of November.
I say that it was not Oswald, and certainly not anyone alone. See you in about 10 months, but meanwhile I shall consider this book.
It was if you were JFK.