Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama: Civil War Disguised as Politics? - ALAN KEYES
AIPNEWS.com ^ | Alan Keyes | Alan Keyes

Posted on 02/09/2009 12:20:24 PM PST by EternalVigilance

When I ran for the U.S. Senate against Barack Obama I did my best to speak the truth. I knew when I accepted the invitation of the Illinois Republicans that I stood little or no chance of victory. With few exceptions, everyone I consulted advised against it. Most thought it political suicide. But the facts convinced me that Obama is a dangerous left-wing extremist. When confronted with the proven depravity of his moral views, my faith and conscience convicted me as well. After years of telling audiences that we had to stand for right and truth no matter what the cost, I felt that the Lord would hold me accountable if I refused to walk the talk. Sometimes we are not called to victory, but to witness for truth, as Jesus did, even unto death.

So when I campaigned in Illinois I let no false ambition; no kind of blandishment or intimidation; and no whispers of political gain or loss distract me from speaking the truth. I talked about Obama's extremist support for abortion (including his unconscionable willingness to tolerate infanticide in Illinois hospitals); I described him as a hard line socialist, pointing out his uncompromising commitment to central government control of health care and education; I pointed to the contradiction between his professed support for traditional marriage and his consistent promotion of the homosexual agenda. I remember talking to people, including Republican leaders, and others who have built little empires and big reputations as leaders of the so-called "Christian right", (what I call more appropriately the moral conservatives). Time and again I heard in response feckless mumblings about how moderate he seemed in his speech at the Democratic convention. Time and again I felt the implication that I was somehow exaggerating, imprudently "demonizing the opposition." They did little or nothing. And when the pro-abortion elements of the Illinois Republican Party openly went on the offensive against my refusal to back down from my stand for moral principle and real conservatism, in silence and inaction these leaders complied with their politically ruthless intention.

Meanwhile I and my family encountered from the Obama forces the ugliest indignities I have ever experienced in politics: Parades in which Obama's marshaled minions shouted curses and epithets almost every step of the way; and forums in which they rudely launched expletives with gestures just short of physical violence. At one such forum the environment they created was so ugly that my wife was visibly shaken, and my daughter in tears. Even on Election Day, when we went to the polling place to vote, a man there created a disturbance. He shouted insults. He acted in a physically threatening way. Nothing was done to stop him, and the pandering Illinois media breathed hardly a word about it in their so-called news coverage.

In all of this there was a hard edged disdain for decent civility that reminded me of the murderous invective Lenin launched against those who opposed the communist agenda. But it all took place behind a media fabricated façade of false hope and moderateness, like the propaganda screen behind which the totalitarians of the twentieth century hid their perpetration of atrocity.

Having felt the cutting edge of this reality, on election night I refused to engage in the nice ritual usually associated with the resolution of our political contests in America. Obama's people treated politics as war. But in war only gutless servility congratulates a ruthless opponent on the victory he has gained without civility. Mine was to be sure, a silent protest but loud enough to have some so-called leaders, supposedly on my side, losing no opportunity to "apologize" for my behavior.

Since 2004 I have walked in the political wilderness. This walk is not without its burdens, but I am heartened when I remember whose footsteps I find there: those of people like Reagan and Winston Churchill who in their dedication to right refused to let ambition triumph over truth. Assaulted, ridiculed, caricatured, ignored, at times reduced to a small and almost covert band of like-minded adherents, they kept their faith. They witnessed the rising power of the evils they warned against. They witnessed the policies of appeasement, retreat and surrender practiced by unprincipled leaders in the face of those evils. They witnessed the day when hard experience finally forced those who had all but forgotten their existence to turn and make a stand against wickedness triumphant over freedom.

I have an ominous feeling about the years ahead. With Obama, we have crossed the line that separates civil politics from civil war disguised as politics. Occupying the White House is a man known for his support and association with people (like leftist Kenyan politician Raila Amollo Odinga) for whom that line appears never to have existed. I predict that American politics as we have known it is gone. And unless we Americans wake up, more than civil politics will end up dead. For there are other footsteps in this wilderness, left by leaders who opposed the Communists when they took over Eastern European countries in the late 1940s, or Asian countries in the fifties, or African countries in the sixties, or South American and South African countries in the eighties, and so on. Mostly we do not know their names, nor can we mark the spot where their lives were overtaken because their compatriots did not wake up in time. But, with the Psalmist, I will fear no evil, for here, as everywhere, I see the footprints of the one who conquered death itself. Wherever they lead, there is life renewed.

Read more from Alan Keyes at www.LoyaltoLiberty.com...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: bho2009; dangerousextremist; deathofthewest; keyes; leftwingextremist; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-200201-202 next last
To: EternalVigilance; All

Nope just telling the truth in how I see people.. He is nothing but a scam artist who just does one thing.. Run for office and takes money away from honest people.


101 posted on 02/09/2009 1:24:36 PM PST by KevinDavis (No one should question our "Dear Leader"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Thug_Mom

I think that would be a tipping point; real anger would spill out into the streets. At least I would hope there are enough patriots to do so.


102 posted on 02/09/2009 1:25:11 PM PST by Billg64 (LOL ROFL Senator Mccain for what????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: TheConservativeParty

My pleasure.

Having had some insights into what went on in IL and after, I find this piece to be a poignant one.


103 posted on 02/09/2009 1:25:22 PM PST by EternalVigilance (The protection of unalienable rights is the sworn duty of all, at every level of government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

That would be awful if it were true. Fortunately, it’s not.


104 posted on 02/09/2009 1:26:15 PM PST by EternalVigilance (The protection of unalienable rights is the sworn duty of all, at every level of government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Alan, I voted for you in the Illinois Senate race. You were the best candidate. I could show you where Barack has even adopted some of your message since then. Thomas Jefferson once, “One man with courage is a majority!”


105 posted on 02/09/2009 1:27:11 PM PST by ignorancerunsrampant (Where is the Court of Common Sense?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance; All

Well it is.. Funny for a guy to keep going to different parties until he was the nominee.


106 posted on 02/09/2009 1:27:41 PM PST by KevinDavis (No one should question our "Dear Leader"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Badeye

May be so, I don’t know, but he is speaking of a time coming for this country which has never been seen here. It’s been seen elsewhere, and it was never pretty.


107 posted on 02/09/2009 1:28:42 PM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Keyes is pulling political strings for the *establishment* once more.

http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/alan_keyes.htm


108 posted on 02/09/2009 1:29:38 PM PST by wolfcreek (There is no 2 party system only arrogant Pols and their handlers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

Ideas, and a sheer will to get them across, can take odd paths.


109 posted on 02/09/2009 1:29:50 PM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity
 
Well, now is the time to explain the Alinsky agenda and methods, and how radical they are.
 
 
Ok...
 


What The Heck Is The Alinsky Method?
Being Used To Destroy Our Freedoms

Albert V. Burns


The education establishment in this country, at all levels, continually decries the absence of parental involvement in the everyday process of educating the young people of this country. We are asked to volunteer time to ease the burdens on the teachers. We are NOT expected to assume that we will have any input into decisions effecting what they will be taught or how the teaching process is to be done.

In the book, "Educating For The New World Order," the author, Bev Eakman points out repeatedly the necessity of the educationists to preserve the ILLUSION that there is: "Lay, or community, participation in the decision making process, while in fact lay citizens are being squeezed out."

It is interesting, and EXTREMELY important to Americans, both as parents and as citizens, to clearly understand just HOW the "squeezing out" process takes place. It is a well defined, if not well perceived, process known as the "Alinsky Method" (which was derived from a procedure named as "The Delphi Technique.") This method of manipulating people is based on the fact that people in groups tend to share a common knowledge base and display certain identifiable characteristics known as "group dynamics."

In this process, one or more people known as "Change Agents" or "Facilitators" appear to be acting as organizers, "allowing" each person in the group to express their concerns about some program or policy under consideration. While this process is going on, people are urged to make lists or form into task forces. The Facilitator carefully notes which members of the group are leaders, which are "loud mouths" and which may be easily swayed to different viewpoints.

At a certain point, the previously friendly Change Agent begins to act as "devil’s advocate," becoming an agitator. The process involves playing one part of the group against another, the "divide and conquer" technique. Anyone who is not clearly in accord with the Facilitator’s agenda is made to appear ridiculous, inarticulate, ignorant or dogmatic. The idea is to make these members of the group angry thus escalating tensions. The end object being to shut opposition voices out of the group.

The "targets" of such manipulation rarely, if ever, realize how they are being manipulated. If they do suspect, they generally have no idea how to defeat the process.

This method is being used at all levels of government to force meetings toward PRESET conclusions. There are three steps to defeating this process. They are simple to learn, if not always easy to put into practice since the Facilitators are well trained in agitation techniques.

The first rule is: Always be charming, pleasant and courteous. SMILE! Speak in a normal voice to avoid seeming to be belligerent or aggressive.

Rule No. 2 is to STAY FOCUSED! Write your question or statement down in advance to help you stay on track. These Change Agents are trained to twist the conversation around to make the questioner appear foolish or belligerent or aggressive. The idea being to put the questioner on the defensive. Be careful! As mentioned in Rule 1, always be charming, pleasant and courteous (if it kills you to do so!) Often an attempt will be made to change the subject, digress or distort your intent. Always bring them back to the question you asked! If they distort your question into what amounts to an accusation of them, simply state clearly and precisely: "That is NOT what I stated. What I asked was..."(here repeat your original question.) Do not be distracted or angered by their efforts to make you look bad.

Rule No. 3: BE PERSISTENT! When the Facilitator realizes that putting you on the defensive is not going to work, quite often he, or she, will go into some long drawn out discussion of some unrelated or only vaguely related subject. Such a discussion may drag on for a number of minutes. The intent being to have the crowd become bored and forget what the original question was. Let them run on, then very calmly, quietly but with determination drag them back to the subject by saying: "But you didn’t answer my question! My question was..."(again repeat your question.)

Never, NEVER allow yourself to become angry. Anger directed toward the Change Agent makes him or her the victim. Their object is to become liked by the crowd, to be seen as a friend by a majority of those present to convince that majority the ideas of the Facilitator are correct and acceptable.

With the increasing demand for education reform, increasing agitation among the public and more and more grassroots research exposing the defects in our current government indoctrination centers, also known as public schools, more and more people are being exposed to this Alinsky method of maneuvering public meetings toward preset goals. Somehow, people walk out of public meetings wondering just what happened - how were their ideas and objections so neatly derailed. This consistent pattern of manipulation of public meetings is causing concern about the corruption of the very process of government established by our Founding Fathers.

Next week we will examine some of the finer points of the Delphi Technique, how and why it was originally developed and how it is being used to destroy our freedoms.


Albert V. Burns writes from Utah and is a regular columnist for the Spanish Fork Press. He has an extensive knowledge of the conspiracy which has been working so hard to destroy this nation and incorporate it into a one world government. He has developed an extensive personal research library and the knowledge to find what he needs, to write his columns. He is a regular columnist for Ether Zone.
Albert V. Burns can be reached at: avburns@mindspring.com

 

110 posted on 02/09/2009 1:30:36 PM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: wolfcreek

That’s utterly ridiculous.


111 posted on 02/09/2009 1:33:31 PM PST by EternalVigilance (The protection of unalienable rights is the sworn duty of all, at every level of government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

Not that “funny” when you consider that those two parties he “went to” don’t represent Reagan conservatism any longer.

He, and we, were willing to do the hard work to prove that, which we did.

And now, as Monty Python would say, “It’s time for something completely different.”


112 posted on 02/09/2009 1:35:58 PM PST by EternalVigilance (The protection of unalienable rights is the sworn duty of all, at every level of government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: VRWCmember
then Obama would have lost the statewide Senate race while running unopposed

What? Obama received nearly as many votes in the Democratic Primary for this race as ALL of the Republicans put together.

Less than 3 months before the election, WHO was going to step in and beat him?

113 posted on 02/09/2009 1:35:58 PM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

I don’t disagree with that.


114 posted on 02/09/2009 1:36:03 PM PST by Badeye (There are no 'great moments' in Moderate Political History. Only losses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

It will get far worse than even Keys writes about in the coming 4 years.


115 posted on 02/09/2009 1:36:18 PM PST by stockpirate (A people unwilling to use violent force to preserve liberty deserve the tyrants that rule them. SP-0)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stockpirate

Very possible.


116 posted on 02/09/2009 1:37:24 PM PST by EternalVigilance (The protection of unalienable rights is the sworn duty of all, at every level of government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: Elsie

"The first rule is: Always be charming, pleasant and courteous. SMILE!
Speak in a normal voice to avoid seeming to be belligerent or aggressive."

117 posted on 02/09/2009 1:39:02 PM PST by HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

When Keyes was running against Obama in Illinois, I heard a lot about it by listening to WLS. They had some really good local conservative talk shows back then, Terry O’Brian and 2 others whose names escape me. They discussed that campaign a lot. Little did we know, that Mr.Keyes’ opponent would lie his way into the White House. Until I read the article today, I did not know the extent of the vile actions Mr.Keyes endured from Obama’s political machine. Kind of like what Sarah is putting up with, and Joe the Plumber, and others.


118 posted on 02/09/2009 1:40:28 PM PST by TheConservativeParty (That's Mrs.Chief Master Sgt. to you sonny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
Excellent commentary from Alan Keyes.

Some may sneer at Keyes for his rock-solid moral stands and pounce on whatever they think his shortcomings are as an excuse to dismiss his views but the absurd comparison to Hillary Clinton (because Keyes moved to a state just to run for office) serves to undercut the assumption that Keyes doesn't deserve to be heard.

Alan Keyes rightfully characterizes what the American people have done by electing an Alinsky Marxist as president and a congress dominated by leftists, both salivating at the realization that finally, they can make their long-anticipated move to change our beloved country from a land of free people, seeking and finding their own destiny, to a land of people subjugated to the now all-powerful government.

Mr. Keyes sounds a serious warning about what may well lie ahead for America and yet, all some posters can do is try to kill the messenger and generate cynicism by inferring Alan Keyes is 'the same as Hillary Clinton'. It's unfortunate that we can't simply accept the truth of what Alan Keyes - who isn't running for office - warns about, without arguing between ourselves why he lost an election in a state where the Democrats have superior numbers. In the 2004 election for the U.S. senate, Barack Obama received 70% of the vote - and 40% of registered Republicans voted for Obama.

This loss, easily predicted, is now laid at Keyes' feet. Alan Keyes, in his piece, admits to being 'lost in the political wilderness' ever since, meaning, no doubt, that he is considered 'untouchable' by Republican bigwigs, those geniuses who helped give us John 'maverick' McCain as 'our' 2008 presidential nominee.

Whether or not you like Alan Keyes personality or agree with his stridently pro-life stands or want to quibble about his political self-sacrifice in the 2004 Illinois senate race, he is stating a clear warning and needs to be paid attention to, not treated as someone who isn't worthy of our respect because he lost a hopeless senate race in a 'red' state, almost 5 years ago.

119 posted on 02/09/2009 1:41:30 PM PST by Jim Scott (Do not go gentle into that good night)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Badeye

You strain at gnats while we are assaulted by lions.


120 posted on 02/09/2009 1:43:56 PM PST by Louis Foxwell (He is the son of soulless slavers, not the son of soulful slaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jim Scott

Well said, Jim.


121 posted on 02/09/2009 1:44:47 PM PST by EternalVigilance (The protection of unalienable rights is the sworn duty of all, at every level of government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
Keyes went to IL because no one else was willing to stand in the way of a wicked man’s ascension to power, all the while knowing that he would have the political and media establishments directing their power against him.

So the people numbed by corruption wanted more of it, and re-elected Blago.

122 posted on 02/09/2009 1:45:12 PM PST by BigSkyFreeper (There is no alternative to the GOP except varying degrees of insanity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
Keyes went to IL because no one else was willing to stand in the way of a wicked man’s ascension to power, all the while knowing that he would have the political and media establishments directing their power against him.

So the people numbed by corruption wanted more of it, and re-elected Blago.

123 posted on 02/09/2009 1:45:53 PM PST by BigSkyFreeper (There is no alternative to the GOP except varying degrees of insanity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

See my tag line. I’ve given up on party loyalties. Which part of the article did you find most offensive? (or unbelievable)


124 posted on 02/09/2009 1:46:14 PM PST by wolfcreek (There is no 2 party system only arrogant Pols and their handlers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance; Badeye

More specifically from Alinsky’s “Rules for Radicals”.

I don’t recall the precise wording, but it is to find a flaw in someone and bring it out to discredit them. This is especially easy to do with conservatives as we actually DO care if someone enhaled or not. (Or messy divorces, or accepted a gift, etc.).


125 posted on 02/09/2009 1:46:19 PM PST by 21twelve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: TheConservativeParty
ntil I read the article today, I did not know the extent of the vile actions Mr.Keyes endured from Obama’s political machine.

I'm glad that he took the time to write this very personal piece then, for that very reason.

126 posted on 02/09/2009 1:46:58 PM PST by EternalVigilance (The protection of unalienable rights is the sworn duty of all, at every level of government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

I think Alan Keyes is right.

O doesn’t care about winning the right way. They plan to entrench their side forever. ZANU-PF USA
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

It should be obvious to anyone paying the slightest attention that Obama cares naught for right and wrong, only power is meaningful to him.


127 posted on 02/09/2009 1:47:04 PM PST by RipSawyer (I have scant HOPE for the PRESENT absent a major CHANGE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
Clinton went to NY because of her insatiable ambition, knowing she would have the political/media establishment in her corner. Keyes went to IL because no one else was willing to stand in the way of a wicked man’s ascension to power, all the while knowing that he would have the political and media establishments directing their power against him.

bttt Those who are incapable of understanding this fundamental truth are already consumed by the corruption that threatens to engulf us all.

128 posted on 02/09/2009 1:47:23 PM PST by Louis Foxwell (He is the son of soulless slavers, not the son of soulful slaves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: 21twelve

A very perceptive comment.


129 posted on 02/09/2009 1:47:31 PM PST by EternalVigilance (The protection of unalienable rights is the sworn duty of all, at every level of government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

How sad to see all the criticism directed against this good man. All anyone needs to know of Alan Keyes, of his conservative credentials, ethics, wisdom, is available online in his writings.
No better example than his comments on Terri Schiavo:

http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=43472


130 posted on 02/09/2009 1:50:29 PM PST by Graymatter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 21twelve

I’ve never read ‘rules for radicals’ sorry. While I agree with most of the assertions Keyes makes here, I would never trust the guy with an elective office.

JMHO.


131 posted on 02/09/2009 1:51:02 PM PST by Badeye (There are no 'great moments' in Moderate Political History. Only losses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: Old Teufel Hunden
Because of this, Ryan was forced out of the race by public opinion.

Perhaps, but I think it was all mock outrage. The politically suicidal Illinois GOP ran by loser Judy Barr Topinka was Ryan's downfall. Ryan was the right candidate in the wrong state. It's a shame what they did to that good man. That's about the time I started watching Obama. He was being groomed for the national stage even at that time. The machine was already behind him and he couldn't lose against anyone.

132 posted on 02/09/2009 1:51:50 PM PST by abishai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Amos the Prophet
already consumed by the corruption that threatens to engulf us all

I think that is a very accurate description of almost all of our "name" political leadership now.

That's why my hope lies in God and with the regular folks who don't have a name necessarily, but who do have a firm grasp on America's core principles and the courage to act in concert to restore respect for them.

The presidency is very powerful, but not as powerful as the LORD or as the American people.

133 posted on 02/09/2009 1:53:20 PM PST by EternalVigilance (The protection of unalienable rights is the sworn duty of all, at every level of government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
I would vote for Mr Keyes for two reasons. I believe what he writes and what he speaks. Secondly, my ex father-in-law a retired educator, thought Keyes was the epitome of evil.
134 posted on 02/09/2009 1:54:00 PM PST by Cyman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
Keyes opened called Obama a Marxist, and was roundly criticized for it, even by so-called Republicans.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Keyes is an honest man of courage.

We shouldn't let a little criticism get in the way of truth.

We must call them fascist Marxists and communists. This puts our traitorous enemies in the defensive position of not only explaining why they are not Marxists, but why they are not fascists as well.

135 posted on 02/09/2009 1:54:45 PM PST by wintertime (Good ideas win! Why? Because people are NOT stupid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Graymatter

That’s a great piece. I’d forgotten about that one.


136 posted on 02/09/2009 1:54:56 PM PST by EternalVigilance (The protection of unalienable rights is the sworn duty of all, at every level of government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: Cyman

Heh...

Well, a man is defined by his enemies as well as by his friends.


137 posted on 02/09/2009 1:55:46 PM PST by EternalVigilance (The protection of unalienable rights is the sworn duty of all, at every level of government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: Elsie
There have been a number of times when Obama has CLEARLY used Alinsky techniques and methods. When he denied knowledge of how radical Rev. Jeremiah Wright and Bill Ayers were. When he tried to appear very calm and moderate on The O'Reilly Factor. His targeting of Rush Limbaugh to instigate "divide and conquer" tactics against the Republicans and conservatives.

Right now he is using the street agitation and rabble rousing techniques to try to drum up support for his Stimulus bill. He starts yelling and fomenting class warfare. It is like Lenin, Castro, Che Guevara, and Mao. Like a Third World dictator.

138 posted on 02/09/2009 1:56:21 PM PST by HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: thackney

I guess you didn’t read the last part of my post?


139 posted on 02/09/2009 1:57:14 PM PST by VRWCmember
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance; Elsie
Fouad Ajami pointed this out during the campaign, about Obama shouting and yelling at cheering crowds in hysteria: Obama and the Politics of Crowds. "There is something odd -- and dare I say novel -- in American politics about the crowds that have been greeting Barack Obama on his campaign trail. Hitherto, crowds have not been a prominent feature of American politics. We associate them with the temper of Third World societies. We think of places like Argentina and Egypt and Iran, of multitudes brought together by their zeal for a Peron or a Nasser or a Khomeini...The morning after the election, the disappointment will begin to settle upon the Obama crowd. Defeat -- by now unthinkable to the devotees -- will bring heartbreak. Victory will steadily deliver the sobering verdict that our troubles won't be solved by a leader's magic."
140 posted on 02/09/2009 2:08:23 PM PST by HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity

Sobering.


141 posted on 02/09/2009 2:09:38 PM PST by EternalVigilance (The protection of unalienable rights is the sworn duty of all, at every level of government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance; All
What a load of self-pitying hucksterism.

Alan Keyes and his inner circle make their living by flitting from one cause to the next, staying just long enough to cash the checks, but never long enough to be held accountable for their utter, complete lack of accomplishments.

Anyone who dares question where the money went, or why Keyes has never won an election or influenced policy in any way whatsoever is accused (by Keyes’ paid staff) of being pro-Obama, and all criticism is met with nasty self-righteousness and a martyr complex. (see the OP and the rest of the thread for good examples)

Alan Keyes and his inner circle lied directly and repeatedly to the faces of Republican donors during the 2004 campaign, and within weeks of the election he and his cronies had packed up their carpetbags and gone on to the next scam.

I didn't think that the Illinois GOP could sink much lower, but Alan Keyes proved my wrong with his scorched-earth failure of a campaign that amounted to nothing more than an extended fundraising endeavor for Keyes and his inner circle. They took a party in disarray and picked the bones, setting it back several years in the process.

142 posted on 02/09/2009 2:12:03 PM PST by Bosh Flimshaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

It’s unAmerican. And unpresidential for him to be yelling like that, trying to instigate class warfare and racial resentment. It’s like he’s trying to wage a cultural revolution in a Third World country.


143 posted on 02/09/2009 2:12:12 PM PST by HowlinglyMind-BendingAbsurdity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: Bosh Flimshaw

Pure fiction.


144 posted on 02/09/2009 2:15:30 PM PST by EternalVigilance (The protection of unalienable rights is the sworn duty of all, at every level of government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: Cyman
I would vote for Mr Keyes for two reasons. I believe what he writes and what he speaks. Secondly, my ex father-in-law a retired educator, thought Keyes was the epitome of evil.

Two very good reasons. Another is that a body like the US senate was made for Dr. Keyes. The major complaint about politicians who allegedly represent our interests is that they are a bunch of inarticulate, namby-pamby, gutless wonders without any clear allegiances. Well, here's someone who could easily out debate any whole commitee in that house, on any topic. And he's on our side, to boot.

145 posted on 02/09/2009 2:19:10 PM PST by Seven plus One
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
Can you believe....and I'm sure you can....that in spite of Obama being everything Keyes said he was...

..we still have 'supposed' Freepers demonizing Keyes rather than Obama.

146 posted on 02/09/2009 2:20:49 PM PST by Guenevere ("He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep, to gain that which he cannot lose")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
Are you disputing that Alan Keyes lied to the people of Illinois (in particular, those people of Illinois donating to his campaign) in telling them that he would remain in Illinois to build grassroots conservatism following the election?

Alan Keyes said he would stay in Illinois while he was soliciting donations and left the state only a few weeks after the November election. You can rationalize *why* he lied all you like, but the fact that he (and his staff) lied cannot be disputed.

147 posted on 02/09/2009 2:20:52 PM PST by Bosh Flimshaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: Bosh Flimshaw

Again, your posts are nothing but a fictionalization of actual events.


148 posted on 02/09/2009 2:27:02 PM PST by EternalVigilance (The protection of unalienable rights is the sworn duty of all, at every level of government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: Badeye

I’d respond to your crass comments re Keyes but others have already done so. Find the videos of Keyes vs Obama debate and you will see 1 man against the many OBots time and again. Would you be as brave? The other R cowards did nothing to support Keyes in the lion’s den.


149 posted on 02/09/2009 2:28:09 PM PST by iopscusa (El Vaquero. (SC Lowcountry Cowboy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Simply waving your hands doesn’t make the facts go away, Mr. Chairman.

Keyes and his minions lied. You can rationalize those lies all you like, but the facts remain.


150 posted on 02/09/2009 2:31:09 PM PST by Bosh Flimshaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-200201-202 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson