Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Surtsey still surprises (land features thought to take millions of years form in less than a decade)
Journal of Creation ^ | David Catchpoole, P.hD.

Posted on 02/16/2009 9:40:48 AM PST by GodGunsGuts

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 261-272 next last
To: GodGunsGuts

hehehe
but, but

it’s sssccciiiiiieeence!


61 posted on 02/16/2009 2:02:28 PM PST by woollyone (I believe God created me- you believe you're related to monkeys. Of course I laughed at you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts

Volcanic islands do green up quickly as Hawaii can attest.
Quite an interesting article.


62 posted on 02/16/2009 2:03:45 PM PST by count-your-change (You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buck W.

[[You can’t credibly support your argument with a link to creationism.org!]]

What a load odf crap- How about refuting what was said instead of engaging in rediculous claims abou5t what ‘can and can not’ be used for evidence, eh? If not- Bye Bye!


63 posted on 02/16/2009 2:55:02 PM PST by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: CottShop

Do you really not see the circular reasoning of using a creationism link to support your thesis? Really?


64 posted on 02/16/2009 3:02:53 PM PST by Buck W. (BHO: Selling hope, keeping the change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: ROLF of the HILL COUNTRY

GGGuts and I have had along running discussion on the meaning of the Hebrew in Genesis and if we do so here it’ll swallow up this thread. (he thinks he’s right, you see).

But I don’t think we’ve bickered ‘cause the finger in the eye only went to the first knuckle.


65 posted on 02/16/2009 3:10:18 PM PST by count-your-change (You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: All

GGG et. al.,

This entire discussion and original post is regarding geology. Not biology. Evolution is biology.

I know you guys have a boner for all things anti-science, and like to lump them together, but c’mon... your irrational dogma based disdain for evolution is clouding your entire lives now.

GEOLOGY, people. Now you can attack that whole established branch of science. I guess astronomy is next.


66 posted on 02/16/2009 3:10:36 PM PST by whattajoke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: whattajoke

No geo in evo? The Temple of Darwinism rebukes you per temple attendant Scott:

Debates and the Globetrotters
by Eugenie Scott
“ Evolution applies to astronomy, physics, chemistry, biochemistry, anthropology, biology, geology — you name the field, and evolution will relate to it, like as not...”


67 posted on 02/16/2009 3:25:56 PM PST by count-your-change (You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Buck W.
"all you’re missing are the sedimentary layers that take millions/billions of years to form."

Fantasy!

Sedimentary layers form quite quickly, especially when the waters that deposit them are boiling hot, with dissolved carbonates at super saturated levels as with Surtsey, and the Genesis judgement.

68 posted on 02/16/2009 3:40:24 PM PST by editor-surveyor (The beginning of the O'Bummer administration looks a lot like the end of the Nixon administration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts

This is going to come as bad news for all the people on here arguing that the grand canyon HAS to be ga-jillions of years old.

Oh, and anyone that doesn’t believe it’s ga-jillions of years old is stupid and hates science.


69 posted on 02/16/2009 3:42:07 PM PST by tpanther (The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing---Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
"In between "Snowball" and "meteor" this was a chunk of North Africa. You find rocks typical of the region in Morocco."

No meteor, just the Genesis judgement that severed Pangea into the present continents.

70 posted on 02/16/2009 3:45:33 PM PST by editor-surveyor (The beginning of the O'Bummer administration looks a lot like the end of the Nixon administration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Buck W.

Are you really ogign to, per usual, simply wave your hand and pretend the site has NO credible science on it?

Yeah- thought so-


71 posted on 02/16/2009 3:48:59 PM PST by CottShop (Scientific belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor
We had a meteor arrive here long after the North Atlantic formed.

Here's the trick, we already know there are OLDER VERSIONS of all the stories in Genesis ~ it was "copied"!

And you know what copying does, right?

Mistakes are made.

Most disturbing is that Moses appear to have simply discarded about 1200 pages of interesting stories about animals and what they do.

Without those stories in hand you don't really have a good idea what Moses meant to convey.

72 posted on 02/16/2009 3:49:41 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: count-your-change; whattajoke
Unfortunately I've had evos tell me that all change is evolution.

When someone's willing to bite off that much territory and his "companions" don't argue with him about it, what are the opponents to do?

If evolution means nothing more than "change", mixing paint is "evolution". Something tells me the better minds among evolutionists can come up with something more sophisticated than that.

73 posted on 02/16/2009 3:54:48 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

I don’t think you mean ALL the storie of Genesis, just the big ones that everyone remembers from Sunday School.

I’d be very interested in links to Babylonian or Egyptian precusors to the stories of Abraham, Jacob or Joseph, for instance.

There is, of course, absolutely no precursor to the story of Abraham—it completely eviscerates the legitimacy of polytheism, which was essential to the political relations of the early civilisations around the Fertile Crescent.


74 posted on 02/16/2009 3:56:18 PM PST by Philo-Junius (One precedent creates another. They soon accumulate and constitute law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Philo-Junius
I think we will eventually dig up the precursors to Abraham ~ however, the stories will be much older than Abraham's time and refer to someone who came up with monotheism in Mesopotamia.

We know an Egyptian came up with it ~ and the Egyptians later did their darndest to hide the idea from us.

75 posted on 02/16/2009 3:59:39 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Philo-Junius

Speaking of the “big stories” the Hindus have their own equally old version of Noah. However, it was modified later on by someone interested in inserting the Messiah into the middle (manifest in his persona as the Great Cobra with 8 heads).


76 posted on 02/16/2009 4:01:22 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Buck W.; CottShop; metmom
Do you really not see the circular reasoning of using a creationism link to support your thesis? Really?

I can't believe You're serious!

Are you for real?

Soooo, the scientists on the dole and arguing manmade global warming on behalf of algoreacle's hotair cult, where the debate is over, and the establishment liberals in "higher" education, including their so-called peer review articles on evolution, meanwhile get a complete free pass?

Are YOU serious?

77 posted on 02/16/2009 4:03:29 PM PST by tpanther (The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing---Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: whattajoke
"This entire discussion and original post is regarding geology."

Very true; nobody but you has mentioned anything but geology.

"Evolution is biology."

Sorry, no cigar. - Evolution is a tennet of uniformitarian faith; Biology is the study of the mechanics of life. Never shall the two meet.

78 posted on 02/16/2009 4:05:03 PM PST by editor-surveyor (The beginning of the O'Bummer administration looks a lot like the end of the Nixon administration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

Whatever you are smoking, you should consider giving it up.


79 posted on 02/16/2009 4:06:27 PM PST by editor-surveyor (The beginning of the O'Bummer administration looks a lot like the end of the Nixon administration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

Akhen-aten came up with monotheism as part of his campaign to break the power of the Egyptian priests; he didn’t abandon his entire social system and social status as an act of faith in the One True God who revealed himself to him.

The story of Abraham is subversive of the world in a way that a Pharaoah’s cult of personality could never be.


80 posted on 02/16/2009 4:08:26 PM PST by Philo-Junius (One precedent creates another. They soon accumulate and constitute law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 261-272 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson