Skip to comments.Revelation, Speculation, and Science
Posted on 02/18/2009 9:17:16 AM PST by GodGunsGuts
Revelation, Speculation, and Science
by Dr. Greg Bahnsen
February 18, 2009
It is one of those embarrassing historical ironies that modern science could not have arisen except in the atmosphere of a Christian world-and-life view. Nevertheless, the scientific community today persists in playing the prodigal by assuming an antagonistic stance against the Christianity of divine revelation. Hypnotized by Darwins evolutionary scheme and enchanted with the products of scientific technology, modern man has granted science a secularized godship and bows before it in fetish idolatry.
The pitting of science against revelation is certainly odd. For, a certain state of affairs is needed for the scientific endeavor to be meaningful or fruitful. The scientist must believe that the state of affairs is conducive to science, or he would not venture into the scientific enterprise. He must believe that there is a world of things and processes that can be known and that he himself sustains a relationship to this world that allows him to know these objects and events. But then, what reason can the scientist give for his belief that the state of affairs is actually conducive to science? Why is the world such as it is and not otherwise?
The Predicament for Science...
(Excerpt) Read more at answersingenesis.org ...
projection (pr& JEK sh&n): the tendency to ascribe to another person feelings, thoughts, or attitudes present in oneself
Hmmmm, okay, these vists to the margin just get wierder and wierder.
Maybe he was thinking of one of you that had no idea where his head was, (while the rest of us have a really good idea...)
yes a coffee enema would work just fine in his case.
[[Organized disruption between 2-3+ DCers starts around post 4.]
Perhaps we should simply start reporting them IF that’s all they are goign to do- they add absolutely NOTHING to the threads.
Roses are red to symbolize the suffering of Christ on the cross.
First, I didn’t cite any website.
Second, all of the charges you make are childish, and typical of the evo charletans that post here. I cannot recall a single instance of an honest person posting here in support of evolution. It goes with the insanity that drives all of them.
Piss me off?
You’re a joke, an uncontrollable guffaw, and a typical one trick pony here.
You can’t do it can you? You can’t admit that Carl Baugh is a fraud and that the Limestone Cowboy is no longer displayed at his museum; a tacit admission that it’s bs.
You are incapable of it. You are pathological.
Please, please, please tell me you have a link to this. That would be simply magnificent.
For cancer, Can’t find it. Found these, however.
"Youre blaming the wrong cause. You should have first opened your gallbladder first, and then done a series of coffee enemas. You were not digesting the fats properly, and that can only mean a plugged up liver and gallbladder. (unless you are old enough to be lacking in stomach acid)"
This is incredible. Thank you so very much for posting these links.
To be completely honest I wasn’t able to find the editor-surveyor post recommending coffee enemas for cancer.
However, if you google coffee enemas and cancer you will find quite a lot. Wikipedia has a relatively neutral article on the subject. There has been an attempt by a qualified MD to test this with terminal cancer patients, but so far he hasn’t found enough volunteers.
I could deal with terminal patients trying anything, and if the test is supervised, so much the better. There is some other weird stuff here, as you have noticed.